Cargando…
Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) overload remains often overlooked due to tedious manual contouring in images. Automated four-chamber EAT area quantification was proposed, leveraging deep-learning segmentation using multi-frame fully convolutional networks (FCN)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010126 |
_version_ | 1784636406990110720 |
---|---|
author | Daudé, Pierre Ancel, Patricia Confort Gouny, Sylviane Jacquier, Alexis Kober, Frank Dutour, Anne Bernard, Monique Gaborit, Bénédicte Rapacchi, Stanislas |
author_facet | Daudé, Pierre Ancel, Patricia Confort Gouny, Sylviane Jacquier, Alexis Kober, Frank Dutour, Anne Bernard, Monique Gaborit, Bénédicte Rapacchi, Stanislas |
author_sort | Daudé, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) overload remains often overlooked due to tedious manual contouring in images. Automated four-chamber EAT area quantification was proposed, leveraging deep-learning segmentation using multi-frame fully convolutional networks (FCN). The investigation involved 100 subjects—comprising healthy, obese, and diabetic patients—who underwent 3T cardiac cine MRI, optimized U-Net and FCN (noted FCNB) were trained on three consecutive cine frames for segmentation of central frame using dice loss. Networks were trained using 4-fold cross-validation (n = 80) and evaluated on an independent dataset (n = 20). Segmentation performances were compared to inter-intra observer bias with dice (DSC) and relative surface error (RSE). Both systole and diastole four-chamber area were correlated with total EAT volume (r = 0.77 and 0.74 respectively). Networks’ performances were equivalent to inter-observers’ bias (EAT: DSC(Inter) = 0.76, DSC(U-Net) = 0.77, DSC(FCNB) = 0.76). U-net outperformed (p < 0.0001) FCNB on all metrics. Eventually, proposed multi-frame U-Net provided automated EAT area quantification with a 14.2% precision for the clinically relevant upper three quarters of EAT area range, scaling patients’ risk of EAT overload with 70% accuracy. Exploiting multi-frame U-Net in standard cine provided automated EAT quantification over a wide range of EAT quantities. The method is made available to the community through a FSLeyes plugin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8774679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87746792022-01-21 Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Daudé, Pierre Ancel, Patricia Confort Gouny, Sylviane Jacquier, Alexis Kober, Frank Dutour, Anne Bernard, Monique Gaborit, Bénédicte Rapacchi, Stanislas Diagnostics (Basel) Article In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) overload remains often overlooked due to tedious manual contouring in images. Automated four-chamber EAT area quantification was proposed, leveraging deep-learning segmentation using multi-frame fully convolutional networks (FCN). The investigation involved 100 subjects—comprising healthy, obese, and diabetic patients—who underwent 3T cardiac cine MRI, optimized U-Net and FCN (noted FCNB) were trained on three consecutive cine frames for segmentation of central frame using dice loss. Networks were trained using 4-fold cross-validation (n = 80) and evaluated on an independent dataset (n = 20). Segmentation performances were compared to inter-intra observer bias with dice (DSC) and relative surface error (RSE). Both systole and diastole four-chamber area were correlated with total EAT volume (r = 0.77 and 0.74 respectively). Networks’ performances were equivalent to inter-observers’ bias (EAT: DSC(Inter) = 0.76, DSC(U-Net) = 0.77, DSC(FCNB) = 0.76). U-net outperformed (p < 0.0001) FCNB on all metrics. Eventually, proposed multi-frame U-Net provided automated EAT area quantification with a 14.2% precision for the clinically relevant upper three quarters of EAT area range, scaling patients’ risk of EAT overload with 70% accuracy. Exploiting multi-frame U-Net in standard cine provided automated EAT quantification over a wide range of EAT quantities. The method is made available to the community through a FSLeyes plugin. MDPI 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8774679/ /pubmed/35054297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010126 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Daudé, Pierre Ancel, Patricia Confort Gouny, Sylviane Jacquier, Alexis Kober, Frank Dutour, Anne Bernard, Monique Gaborit, Bénédicte Rapacchi, Stanislas Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | Deep-Learning Segmentation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Four-Chamber Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | deep-learning segmentation of epicardial adipose tissue using four-chamber cardiac magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daudepierre deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT ancelpatricia deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT confortgounysylviane deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT jacquieralexis deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT koberfrank deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT dutouranne deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT bernardmonique deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT gaboritbenedicte deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging AT rapacchistanislas deeplearningsegmentationofepicardialadiposetissueusingfourchambercardiacmagneticresonanceimaging |