Cargando…
Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069 |
_version_ | 1784636427756109824 |
---|---|
author | Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Padoy, Nicolas Labani, Aissam Roy, Catherine Schindler, Thomas Hellmut El Ghannudi, Soraya |
author_facet | Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Padoy, Nicolas Labani, Aissam Roy, Catherine Schindler, Thomas Hellmut El Ghannudi, Soraya |
author_sort | Germain, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of other origins were retrospectively selected. Diastolic and systolic cine-CMR images were preprocessed and labeled. A dual-input visual geometry group (VGG ) model was used for binary image classification. All images belonging to the same patient were distributed in the same set. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated per frame and per patient from a 40% held-out test set. Results were compared to a visual analysis assessed by three experienced operators. Results: frame-based comparisons between humans and a CNN provided an accuracy of 0.605 vs. 0.746 (p < 0.0008) and an AUC of 0.630 vs. 0.824 (p < 0.0001). Patient-based comparisons provided an accuracy of 0.660 vs. 0.825 (p < 0.008) and an AUC of 0.727 vs. 0.895 (p < 0.002). Conclusion: based on cine-CMR images alone, a CNN is able to discriminate cardiac amyloidosis from LVH of other origins better than experienced human operators (15 to 20 points more in absolute value for accuracy and AUC), demonstrating a unique capability to identify what the eyes cannot see through classical radiological analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8774777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87747772022-01-21 Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Padoy, Nicolas Labani, Aissam Roy, Catherine Schindler, Thomas Hellmut El Ghannudi, Soraya Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of other origins were retrospectively selected. Diastolic and systolic cine-CMR images were preprocessed and labeled. A dual-input visual geometry group (VGG ) model was used for binary image classification. All images belonging to the same patient were distributed in the same set. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated per frame and per patient from a 40% held-out test set. Results were compared to a visual analysis assessed by three experienced operators. Results: frame-based comparisons between humans and a CNN provided an accuracy of 0.605 vs. 0.746 (p < 0.0008) and an AUC of 0.630 vs. 0.824 (p < 0.0001). Patient-based comparisons provided an accuracy of 0.660 vs. 0.825 (p < 0.008) and an AUC of 0.727 vs. 0.895 (p < 0.002). Conclusion: based on cine-CMR images alone, a CNN is able to discriminate cardiac amyloidosis from LVH of other origins better than experienced human operators (15 to 20 points more in absolute value for accuracy and AUC), demonstrating a unique capability to identify what the eyes cannot see through classical radiological analysis. MDPI 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8774777/ /pubmed/35054236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Padoy, Nicolas Labani, Aissam Roy, Catherine Schindler, Thomas Hellmut El Ghannudi, Soraya Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title | Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title_full | Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title_short | Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR |
title_sort | deep learning supplants visual analysis by experienced operators for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis by cine-cmr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT germainphilippe deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT vardazaryanarmine deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT padoynicolas deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT labaniaissam deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT roycatherine deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT schindlerthomashellmut deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr AT elghannudisoraya deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr |