Cargando…

Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR

Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germain, Philippe, Vardazaryan, Armine, Padoy, Nicolas, Labani, Aissam, Roy, Catherine, Schindler, Thomas Hellmut, El Ghannudi, Soraya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069
_version_ 1784636427756109824
author Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Padoy, Nicolas
Labani, Aissam
Roy, Catherine
Schindler, Thomas Hellmut
El Ghannudi, Soraya
author_facet Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Padoy, Nicolas
Labani, Aissam
Roy, Catherine
Schindler, Thomas Hellmut
El Ghannudi, Soraya
author_sort Germain, Philippe
collection PubMed
description Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of other origins were retrospectively selected. Diastolic and systolic cine-CMR images were preprocessed and labeled. A dual-input visual geometry group (VGG ) model was used for binary image classification. All images belonging to the same patient were distributed in the same set. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated per frame and per patient from a 40% held-out test set. Results were compared to a visual analysis assessed by three experienced operators. Results: frame-based comparisons between humans and a CNN provided an accuracy of 0.605 vs. 0.746 (p < 0.0008) and an AUC of 0.630 vs. 0.824 (p < 0.0001). Patient-based comparisons provided an accuracy of 0.660 vs. 0.825 (p < 0.008) and an AUC of 0.727 vs. 0.895 (p < 0.002). Conclusion: based on cine-CMR images alone, a CNN is able to discriminate cardiac amyloidosis from LVH of other origins better than experienced human operators (15 to 20 points more in absolute value for accuracy and AUC), demonstrating a unique capability to identify what the eyes cannot see through classical radiological analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8774777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87747772022-01-21 Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Padoy, Nicolas Labani, Aissam Roy, Catherine Schindler, Thomas Hellmut El Ghannudi, Soraya Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of other origins were retrospectively selected. Diastolic and systolic cine-CMR images were preprocessed and labeled. A dual-input visual geometry group (VGG ) model was used for binary image classification. All images belonging to the same patient were distributed in the same set. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated per frame and per patient from a 40% held-out test set. Results were compared to a visual analysis assessed by three experienced operators. Results: frame-based comparisons between humans and a CNN provided an accuracy of 0.605 vs. 0.746 (p < 0.0008) and an AUC of 0.630 vs. 0.824 (p < 0.0001). Patient-based comparisons provided an accuracy of 0.660 vs. 0.825 (p < 0.008) and an AUC of 0.727 vs. 0.895 (p < 0.002). Conclusion: based on cine-CMR images alone, a CNN is able to discriminate cardiac amyloidosis from LVH of other origins better than experienced human operators (15 to 20 points more in absolute value for accuracy and AUC), demonstrating a unique capability to identify what the eyes cannot see through classical radiological analysis. MDPI 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8774777/ /pubmed/35054236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Padoy, Nicolas
Labani, Aissam
Roy, Catherine
Schindler, Thomas Hellmut
El Ghannudi, Soraya
Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title_full Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title_fullStr Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title_short Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR
title_sort deep learning supplants visual analysis by experienced operators for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis by cine-cmr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010069
work_keys_str_mv AT germainphilippe deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT vardazaryanarmine deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT padoynicolas deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT labaniaissam deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT roycatherine deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT schindlerthomashellmut deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr
AT elghannudisoraya deeplearningsupplantsvisualanalysisbyexperiencedoperatorsforthediagnosisofcardiacamyloidosisbycinecmr