Cargando…

Differences between [(18)F]FLT and [(18)F]FDG Uptake in PET/CT Imaging in CC Depend on Vaginal Bacteriology

This study aims to investigate if vaginal bacteriology obtained prior to treatment influences the 3′-deoxy-3 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) [(18)F]FLT and 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose (2-[(18)F]FDG) [(18)F]FDG parameters in positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in cervical cancer (CC) patients. Meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burchardt, Ewa, Warenczak-Florczak, Zaneta, Cegła, Paulina, Piotrowski, Adam, Cybulski, Zefiryn, Burchardt, Wojciech, Roszak, Andrzej, Cholewiński, Witold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010070
Descripción
Sumario:This study aims to investigate if vaginal bacteriology obtained prior to treatment influences the 3′-deoxy-3 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) [(18)F]FLT and 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose (2-[(18)F]FDG) [(18)F]FDG parameters in positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in cervical cancer (CC) patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 39 women with locally advanced histologically confirmed cervical cancer who underwent dual tracer PET/CT examinations. The [(18)F]FLT and [(18)F]FDG PET parameters in the primary tumor, including SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, heterogeneity, before radiotherapy (RT) were analyzed, depending on the bacteriology. The p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In the vaginal and/or cervical smears, there were 27 (79.4%) positive results. In seven (20.6%) cases, no opportunistic pathogen growth was observed (No Bacteria Group). In positive bacteriology, eleven (32%) Gram-negative bacilli (Bacteria group 2) and fifteen (44%) Gram-positive bacteria (Bacteria group 1) were detected. Five patients with unknown results were excluded from the analysis. Data analysis shows a statistically significant difference between the SUV(max), and SUV(min) values for three independent groups for the [(18)F]FLT. Conclusions: The lowest values of SUV(max) and SUV(min) for [(18)F]FLT are registered in Gram-negative bacteria, higher are in Gram-positive, and the absence of bacteria causes the highest [(18)F]FLT values.