Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections

Multiplex nucleic acid amplification assays that simultaneously detect multiple respiratory pathogens in a single nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen are widely used for rapid clinical diagnostics. We evaluated Allplex Respiratory Panel (RP) 1, 2, 3, and the BioFire FilmArray RP assay for detecting r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lade, Harshad, Kim, Jung-Min, Chung, Yousun, Han, Minje, Mo, Eun-Kyung, Kim, Jae-Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010009
_version_ 1784636501376630784
author Lade, Harshad
Kim, Jung-Min
Chung, Yousun
Han, Minje
Mo, Eun-Kyung
Kim, Jae-Seok
author_facet Lade, Harshad
Kim, Jung-Min
Chung, Yousun
Han, Minje
Mo, Eun-Kyung
Kim, Jae-Seok
author_sort Lade, Harshad
collection PubMed
description Multiplex nucleic acid amplification assays that simultaneously detect multiple respiratory pathogens in a single nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen are widely used for rapid clinical diagnostics. We evaluated Allplex Respiratory Panel (RP) 1, 2, 3, and the BioFire FilmArray RP assay for detecting respiratory pathogens from NPS specimens. In all, 181 NPS specimens obtained from patients suspected of having respiratory infections during the non-influenza season (August–December 2019) were included. The Allplex RP 1, 2, and 3 detected 154 samples positive for respiratory viruses, whereas the BioFire FilmArray detected viruses in 98 samples. Co-infection with two or more viruses was detected in 41 and 17 NPS specimens by Allplex RP and the BioFire FilmArray RP, respectively. For adenoviruses, Allplex RP 1 detected 31 specimens, compared to 34 by the BioFire FilmArray. In all, 64 NPS specimens were positive for human enterovirus (HEV) and human rhinovirus (HRV) on the Allplex RP, in contrast to 39 HEV/HRV on the BioFire FilmArray. The parainfluenza virus (PIV-1–4) detection rate differed between the two systems. Most discrepant results were observed for NPS specimens with high cycle threshold values obtained by Allplex RP. This study showed concordant performance of the Allplex RP 1, 2, 3, and the BioFire FilmArray RP for the simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87751032022-01-21 Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections Lade, Harshad Kim, Jung-Min Chung, Yousun Han, Minje Mo, Eun-Kyung Kim, Jae-Seok Diagnostics (Basel) Article Multiplex nucleic acid amplification assays that simultaneously detect multiple respiratory pathogens in a single nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen are widely used for rapid clinical diagnostics. We evaluated Allplex Respiratory Panel (RP) 1, 2, 3, and the BioFire FilmArray RP assay for detecting respiratory pathogens from NPS specimens. In all, 181 NPS specimens obtained from patients suspected of having respiratory infections during the non-influenza season (August–December 2019) were included. The Allplex RP 1, 2, and 3 detected 154 samples positive for respiratory viruses, whereas the BioFire FilmArray detected viruses in 98 samples. Co-infection with two or more viruses was detected in 41 and 17 NPS specimens by Allplex RP and the BioFire FilmArray RP, respectively. For adenoviruses, Allplex RP 1 detected 31 specimens, compared to 34 by the BioFire FilmArray. In all, 64 NPS specimens were positive for human enterovirus (HEV) and human rhinovirus (HRV) on the Allplex RP, in contrast to 39 HEV/HRV on the BioFire FilmArray. The parainfluenza virus (PIV-1–4) detection rate differed between the two systems. Most discrepant results were observed for NPS specimens with high cycle threshold values obtained by Allplex RP. This study showed concordant performance of the Allplex RP 1, 2, 3, and the BioFire FilmArray RP for the simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. MDPI 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8775103/ /pubmed/35054176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010009 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lade, Harshad
Kim, Jung-Min
Chung, Yousun
Han, Minje
Mo, Eun-Kyung
Kim, Jae-Seok
Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections
title_sort comparative evaluation of allplex respiratory panels 1, 2, 3, and biofire filmarray respiratory panel for the detection of respiratory infections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010009
work_keys_str_mv AT ladeharshad comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections
AT kimjungmin comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections
AT chungyousun comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections
AT hanminje comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections
AT moeunkyung comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections
AT kimjaeseok comparativeevaluationofallplexrespiratorypanels123andbiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelforthedetectionofrespiratoryinfections