Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai, Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu, Iordache, Sevastita, Turcu-Stiolica, Adina, Facciorusso, Antonio, Crinò, Stefano Francesco, Saftoiu, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100
_version_ 1784636505424134144
author Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Iordache, Sevastita
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Facciorusso, Antonio
Crinò, Stefano Francesco
Saftoiu, Adrian
author_facet Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Iordache, Sevastita
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Facciorusso, Antonio
Crinò, Stefano Francesco
Saftoiu, Adrian
author_sort Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the included studies was done with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used R and Review Manager 5.4.1 for calculations and statistical analysis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS after NT for gastric cancer restaging, we performed a meta-analysis on six studies, with a total of 283 patients, including true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results for T1-T4, N0. EUS as a diagnostic test for GC patients after chemotherapy has a relatively low DOR for the T2 (3.96) and T4 stages (4.79) and a relatively high partial AUC for the T2 (0.85) and T4 (0.71) stages. Our results reveal that the pooled sensitivity for T stages after chemotherapy is rather low (29–56%), except for the T3 stage (71%). A potential limitation of our study was the small number of included studies, but no significant heterogeneity was found between them. Our meta-analysis concludes that EUS is not recommended or is still under debate for GC restaging after NT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87751152022-01-21 Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Iordache, Sevastita Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Facciorusso, Antonio Crinò, Stefano Francesco Saftoiu, Adrian Diagnostics (Basel) Review This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the included studies was done with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used R and Review Manager 5.4.1 for calculations and statistical analysis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS after NT for gastric cancer restaging, we performed a meta-analysis on six studies, with a total of 283 patients, including true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results for T1-T4, N0. EUS as a diagnostic test for GC patients after chemotherapy has a relatively low DOR for the T2 (3.96) and T4 stages (4.79) and a relatively high partial AUC for the T2 (0.85) and T4 (0.71) stages. Our results reveal that the pooled sensitivity for T stages after chemotherapy is rather low (29–56%), except for the T3 stage (71%). A potential limitation of our study was the small number of included studies, but no significant heterogeneity was found between them. Our meta-analysis concludes that EUS is not recommended or is still under debate for GC restaging after NT. MDPI 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8775115/ /pubmed/35054266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Iordache, Sevastita
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Facciorusso, Antonio
Crinò, Stefano Francesco
Saftoiu, Adrian
Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_full Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_short Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_sort diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer restaging: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100
work_keys_str_mv AT sacerdotianuvictormihai diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT ungureanubogdansilviu diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT iordachesevastita diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT turcustiolicaadina diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT facciorussoantonio diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT crinostefanofrancesco diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT saftoiuadrian diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest