Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100 |
_version_ | 1784636505424134144 |
---|---|
author | Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Iordache, Sevastita Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Facciorusso, Antonio Crinò, Stefano Francesco Saftoiu, Adrian |
author_facet | Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Iordache, Sevastita Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Facciorusso, Antonio Crinò, Stefano Francesco Saftoiu, Adrian |
author_sort | Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the included studies was done with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used R and Review Manager 5.4.1 for calculations and statistical analysis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS after NT for gastric cancer restaging, we performed a meta-analysis on six studies, with a total of 283 patients, including true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results for T1-T4, N0. EUS as a diagnostic test for GC patients after chemotherapy has a relatively low DOR for the T2 (3.96) and T4 stages (4.79) and a relatively high partial AUC for the T2 (0.85) and T4 (0.71) stages. Our results reveal that the pooled sensitivity for T stages after chemotherapy is rather low (29–56%), except for the T3 stage (71%). A potential limitation of our study was the small number of included studies, but no significant heterogeneity was found between them. Our meta-analysis concludes that EUS is not recommended or is still under debate for GC restaging after NT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8775115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87751152022-01-21 Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Iordache, Sevastita Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Facciorusso, Antonio Crinò, Stefano Francesco Saftoiu, Adrian Diagnostics (Basel) Review This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the included studies was done with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used R and Review Manager 5.4.1 for calculations and statistical analysis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS after NT for gastric cancer restaging, we performed a meta-analysis on six studies, with a total of 283 patients, including true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results for T1-T4, N0. EUS as a diagnostic test for GC patients after chemotherapy has a relatively low DOR for the T2 (3.96) and T4 stages (4.79) and a relatively high partial AUC for the T2 (0.85) and T4 (0.71) stages. Our results reveal that the pooled sensitivity for T stages after chemotherapy is rather low (29–56%), except for the T3 stage (71%). A potential limitation of our study was the small number of included studies, but no significant heterogeneity was found between them. Our meta-analysis concludes that EUS is not recommended or is still under debate for GC restaging after NT. MDPI 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8775115/ /pubmed/35054266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Iordache, Sevastita Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Facciorusso, Antonio Crinò, Stefano Francesco Saftoiu, Adrian Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title | Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test |
title_sort | diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer restaging: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sacerdotianuvictormihai diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT ungureanubogdansilviu diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT iordachesevastita diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT turcustiolicaadina diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT facciorussoantonio diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT crinostefanofrancesco diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest AT saftoiuadrian diagnosticvalueofendoscopicultrasoundafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforgastriccancerrestagingametaanalysisofdiagnostictest |