Cargando…
A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 wei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077 |
_version_ | 1784636531422527488 |
---|---|
author | Haacke, Ewart Mark Bernitsas, Evanthia Subramanian, Karthik Utriainen, David Palutla, Vinay Kumar Yerramsetty, Kiran Kumar, Prashanth Sethi, Sean K. Chen, Yongsheng Latif, Zahid Jella, Pavan Gharabaghi, Sara Wang, Ying Zhang, Xiaomeng Comley, Robert A. Beaver, John Luo, Yanping |
author_facet | Haacke, Ewart Mark Bernitsas, Evanthia Subramanian, Karthik Utriainen, David Palutla, Vinay Kumar Yerramsetty, Kiran Kumar, Prashanth Sethi, Sean K. Chen, Yongsheng Latif, Zahid Jella, Pavan Gharabaghi, Sara Wang, Ying Zhang, Xiaomeng Comley, Robert A. Beaver, John Luo, Yanping |
author_sort | Haacke, Ewart Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 weighted imaging (T1WI, T2WI), T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), magnetization transfer, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), phase-sensitive inversion recovery and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), but no study has combined all of these modalities into a single well-controlled investigation. The goals of this study were to: compare different MRI measures for lesion visualization and quantification; evaluate the repeatability of various imaging methods in healthy controls; compare quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with myelin water fraction; measure short-term longitudinal changes in the white matter of MS patients and map out the tissue properties of the white matter hyperintensities using STAGE (strategically acquired gradient echo imaging). Additionally, the outcomes of this study were anticipated to aid in the choice of an efficient imaging protocol reducing redundancy of information and alleviating patient burden. Of all the sequences used, T2 FLAIR and T2WI showed the most lesions. To differentiate the putative demyelinating lesions from inflammatory lesions, the fusion of SWI and T2 FLAIR was used. Our study suggests that a practical and efficient imaging protocol combining T2 FLAIR, T1WI and STAGE (with SWI and QSM) can be used to rapidly image MS patients to both find lesions and study the demyelinating and inflammatory characteristics of the lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8775217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87752172022-01-21 A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design Haacke, Ewart Mark Bernitsas, Evanthia Subramanian, Karthik Utriainen, David Palutla, Vinay Kumar Yerramsetty, Kiran Kumar, Prashanth Sethi, Sean K. Chen, Yongsheng Latif, Zahid Jella, Pavan Gharabaghi, Sara Wang, Ying Zhang, Xiaomeng Comley, Robert A. Beaver, John Luo, Yanping Diagnostics (Basel) Article Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 weighted imaging (T1WI, T2WI), T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), magnetization transfer, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), phase-sensitive inversion recovery and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), but no study has combined all of these modalities into a single well-controlled investigation. The goals of this study were to: compare different MRI measures for lesion visualization and quantification; evaluate the repeatability of various imaging methods in healthy controls; compare quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with myelin water fraction; measure short-term longitudinal changes in the white matter of MS patients and map out the tissue properties of the white matter hyperintensities using STAGE (strategically acquired gradient echo imaging). Additionally, the outcomes of this study were anticipated to aid in the choice of an efficient imaging protocol reducing redundancy of information and alleviating patient burden. Of all the sequences used, T2 FLAIR and T2WI showed the most lesions. To differentiate the putative demyelinating lesions from inflammatory lesions, the fusion of SWI and T2 FLAIR was used. Our study suggests that a practical and efficient imaging protocol combining T2 FLAIR, T1WI and STAGE (with SWI and QSM) can be used to rapidly image MS patients to both find lesions and study the demyelinating and inflammatory characteristics of the lesions. MDPI 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8775217/ /pubmed/35054244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Haacke, Ewart Mark Bernitsas, Evanthia Subramanian, Karthik Utriainen, David Palutla, Vinay Kumar Yerramsetty, Kiran Kumar, Prashanth Sethi, Sean K. Chen, Yongsheng Latif, Zahid Jella, Pavan Gharabaghi, Sara Wang, Ying Zhang, Xiaomeng Comley, Robert A. Beaver, John Luo, Yanping A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title | A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title_full | A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title_short | A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design |
title_sort | comparison of magnetic resonance imaging methods to assess multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for patient characterization and clinical trial design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haackeewartmark acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT bernitsasevanthia acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT subramaniankarthik acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT utriainendavid acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT palutlavinaykumar acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT yerramsettykiran acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT kumarprashanth acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT sethiseank acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT chenyongsheng acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT latifzahid acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT jellapavan acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT gharabaghisara acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT wangying acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT zhangxiaomeng acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT comleyroberta acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT beaverjohn acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT luoyanping acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT haackeewartmark comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT bernitsasevanthia comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT subramaniankarthik comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT utriainendavid comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT palutlavinaykumar comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT yerramsettykiran comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT kumarprashanth comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT sethiseank comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT chenyongsheng comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT latifzahid comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT jellapavan comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT gharabaghisara comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT wangying comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT zhangxiaomeng comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT comleyroberta comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT beaverjohn comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign AT luoyanping comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign |