Cargando…

A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 wei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haacke, Ewart Mark, Bernitsas, Evanthia, Subramanian, Karthik, Utriainen, David, Palutla, Vinay Kumar, Yerramsetty, Kiran, Kumar, Prashanth, Sethi, Sean K., Chen, Yongsheng, Latif, Zahid, Jella, Pavan, Gharabaghi, Sara, Wang, Ying, Zhang, Xiaomeng, Comley, Robert A., Beaver, John, Luo, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077
_version_ 1784636531422527488
author Haacke, Ewart Mark
Bernitsas, Evanthia
Subramanian, Karthik
Utriainen, David
Palutla, Vinay Kumar
Yerramsetty, Kiran
Kumar, Prashanth
Sethi, Sean K.
Chen, Yongsheng
Latif, Zahid
Jella, Pavan
Gharabaghi, Sara
Wang, Ying
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Comley, Robert A.
Beaver, John
Luo, Yanping
author_facet Haacke, Ewart Mark
Bernitsas, Evanthia
Subramanian, Karthik
Utriainen, David
Palutla, Vinay Kumar
Yerramsetty, Kiran
Kumar, Prashanth
Sethi, Sean K.
Chen, Yongsheng
Latif, Zahid
Jella, Pavan
Gharabaghi, Sara
Wang, Ying
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Comley, Robert A.
Beaver, John
Luo, Yanping
author_sort Haacke, Ewart Mark
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 weighted imaging (T1WI, T2WI), T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), magnetization transfer, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), phase-sensitive inversion recovery and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), but no study has combined all of these modalities into a single well-controlled investigation. The goals of this study were to: compare different MRI measures for lesion visualization and quantification; evaluate the repeatability of various imaging methods in healthy controls; compare quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with myelin water fraction; measure short-term longitudinal changes in the white matter of MS patients and map out the tissue properties of the white matter hyperintensities using STAGE (strategically acquired gradient echo imaging). Additionally, the outcomes of this study were anticipated to aid in the choice of an efficient imaging protocol reducing redundancy of information and alleviating patient burden. Of all the sequences used, T2 FLAIR and T2WI showed the most lesions. To differentiate the putative demyelinating lesions from inflammatory lesions, the fusion of SWI and T2 FLAIR was used. Our study suggests that a practical and efficient imaging protocol combining T2 FLAIR, T1WI and STAGE (with SWI and QSM) can be used to rapidly image MS patients to both find lesions and study the demyelinating and inflammatory characteristics of the lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87752172022-01-21 A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design Haacke, Ewart Mark Bernitsas, Evanthia Subramanian, Karthik Utriainen, David Palutla, Vinay Kumar Yerramsetty, Kiran Kumar, Prashanth Sethi, Sean K. Chen, Yongsheng Latif, Zahid Jella, Pavan Gharabaghi, Sara Wang, Ying Zhang, Xiaomeng Comley, Robert A. Beaver, John Luo, Yanping Diagnostics (Basel) Article Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality for identifying inflammatory and/or demyelinating lesions, which is critical for a clinical diagnosis of MS and evaluating drug responses. There are many unique means of probing brain tissue status, including conventional T1 and T2 weighted imaging (T1WI, T2WI), T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), magnetization transfer, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), phase-sensitive inversion recovery and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), but no study has combined all of these modalities into a single well-controlled investigation. The goals of this study were to: compare different MRI measures for lesion visualization and quantification; evaluate the repeatability of various imaging methods in healthy controls; compare quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with myelin water fraction; measure short-term longitudinal changes in the white matter of MS patients and map out the tissue properties of the white matter hyperintensities using STAGE (strategically acquired gradient echo imaging). Additionally, the outcomes of this study were anticipated to aid in the choice of an efficient imaging protocol reducing redundancy of information and alleviating patient burden. Of all the sequences used, T2 FLAIR and T2WI showed the most lesions. To differentiate the putative demyelinating lesions from inflammatory lesions, the fusion of SWI and T2 FLAIR was used. Our study suggests that a practical and efficient imaging protocol combining T2 FLAIR, T1WI and STAGE (with SWI and QSM) can be used to rapidly image MS patients to both find lesions and study the demyelinating and inflammatory characteristics of the lesions. MDPI 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8775217/ /pubmed/35054244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haacke, Ewart Mark
Bernitsas, Evanthia
Subramanian, Karthik
Utriainen, David
Palutla, Vinay Kumar
Yerramsetty, Kiran
Kumar, Prashanth
Sethi, Sean K.
Chen, Yongsheng
Latif, Zahid
Jella, Pavan
Gharabaghi, Sara
Wang, Ying
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Comley, Robert A.
Beaver, John
Luo, Yanping
A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title_full A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title_fullStr A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title_short A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods to Assess Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Implications for Patient Characterization and Clinical Trial Design
title_sort comparison of magnetic resonance imaging methods to assess multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for patient characterization and clinical trial design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010077
work_keys_str_mv AT haackeewartmark acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT bernitsasevanthia acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT subramaniankarthik acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT utriainendavid acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT palutlavinaykumar acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT yerramsettykiran acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT kumarprashanth acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT sethiseank acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT chenyongsheng acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT latifzahid acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT jellapavan acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT gharabaghisara acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT wangying acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT zhangxiaomeng acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT comleyroberta acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT beaverjohn acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT luoyanping acomparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT haackeewartmark comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT bernitsasevanthia comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT subramaniankarthik comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT utriainendavid comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT palutlavinaykumar comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT yerramsettykiran comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT kumarprashanth comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT sethiseank comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT chenyongsheng comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT latifzahid comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT jellapavan comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT gharabaghisara comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT wangying comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT zhangxiaomeng comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT comleyroberta comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT beaverjohn comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign
AT luoyanping comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingmethodstoassessmultiplesclerosislesionsimplicationsforpatientcharacterizationandclinicaltrialdesign