Cargando…
Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters
Background: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is the universal method for the surveillance of fetal well-being in intrapartum. Our objective was to predict acidemia from fetal heart signal features using machine learning algorithms. Methods: A case–control 1:2 study was carried out compromising 378...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24010068 |
_version_ | 1784636532559183872 |
---|---|
author | Esteban-Escaño, Javier Castán, Berta Castán, Sergio Chóliz-Ezquerro, Marta Asensio, César Laliena, Antonio R. Sanz-Enguita, Gerardo Sanz, Gerardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Savirón, Ricardo |
author_facet | Esteban-Escaño, Javier Castán, Berta Castán, Sergio Chóliz-Ezquerro, Marta Asensio, César Laliena, Antonio R. Sanz-Enguita, Gerardo Sanz, Gerardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Savirón, Ricardo |
author_sort | Esteban-Escaño, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is the universal method for the surveillance of fetal well-being in intrapartum. Our objective was to predict acidemia from fetal heart signal features using machine learning algorithms. Methods: A case–control 1:2 study was carried out compromising 378 infants, born in the Miguel Servet University Hospital, Spain. Neonatal acidemia was defined as pH < 7.10. Using EFM recording logistic regression, random forest and neural networks models were built to predict acidemia. Validation of models was performed by means of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Results: Best performance was attained using a random forest model built with 100 trees. The discrimination ability was good, with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.865. The calibration showed a slight overestimation of acidemia occurrence for probabilities above 0.4. The clinical utility showed that for 33% cutoff point, missing 5% of acidotic cases, 46% of unnecessary cesarean sections could be prevented. Logistic regression and neural networks showed similar discrimination ability but with worse calibration and clinical utility. Conclusions: The combination of the variables extracted from EFM recording provided a predictive model of acidemia that showed good accuracy and provides a practical tool to prevent unnecessary cesarean sections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8775221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87752212022-01-21 Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters Esteban-Escaño, Javier Castán, Berta Castán, Sergio Chóliz-Ezquerro, Marta Asensio, César Laliena, Antonio R. Sanz-Enguita, Gerardo Sanz, Gerardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Savirón, Ricardo Entropy (Basel) Article Background: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is the universal method for the surveillance of fetal well-being in intrapartum. Our objective was to predict acidemia from fetal heart signal features using machine learning algorithms. Methods: A case–control 1:2 study was carried out compromising 378 infants, born in the Miguel Servet University Hospital, Spain. Neonatal acidemia was defined as pH < 7.10. Using EFM recording logistic regression, random forest and neural networks models were built to predict acidemia. Validation of models was performed by means of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Results: Best performance was attained using a random forest model built with 100 trees. The discrimination ability was good, with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.865. The calibration showed a slight overestimation of acidemia occurrence for probabilities above 0.4. The clinical utility showed that for 33% cutoff point, missing 5% of acidotic cases, 46% of unnecessary cesarean sections could be prevented. Logistic regression and neural networks showed similar discrimination ability but with worse calibration and clinical utility. Conclusions: The combination of the variables extracted from EFM recording provided a predictive model of acidemia that showed good accuracy and provides a practical tool to prevent unnecessary cesarean sections. MDPI 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8775221/ /pubmed/35052094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24010068 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Esteban-Escaño, Javier Castán, Berta Castán, Sergio Chóliz-Ezquerro, Marta Asensio, César Laliena, Antonio R. Sanz-Enguita, Gerardo Sanz, Gerardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Savirón, Ricardo Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title | Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title_full | Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title_short | Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Acidemia Using Electronic Fetal Monitoring Recording Parameters |
title_sort | machine learning algorithm to predict acidemia using electronic fetal monitoring recording parameters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24010068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estebanescanojavier machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT castanberta machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT castansergio machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT cholizezquerromarta machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT asensiocesar machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT lalienaantonior machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT sanzenguitagerardo machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT sanzgerardo machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT estebanluismariano machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters AT savironricardo machinelearningalgorithmtopredictacidemiausingelectronicfetalmonitoringrecordingparameters |