Cargando…

Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis

The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabedo-Peris, Javier, Martí-Vilar, Manuel, Merino-Soto, César, Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029
_version_ 1784636591290974208
author Cabedo-Peris, Javier
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda
author_facet Cabedo-Peris, Javier
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda
author_sort Cabedo-Peris, Javier
collection PubMed
description The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach’s α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I(2) = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach’s α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87754612022-01-21 Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Cabedo-Peris, Javier Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda Healthcare (Basel) Review The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach’s α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I(2) = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach’s α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8775461/ /pubmed/35052193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cabedo-Peris, Javier
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda
Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title_full Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title_short Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
title_sort basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029
work_keys_str_mv AT cabedoperisjavier basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis
AT martivilarmanuel basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis
AT merinosotocesar basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis
AT ortizmoranmafalda basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis