Cargando…
Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029 |
_version_ | 1784636591290974208 |
---|---|
author | Cabedo-Peris, Javier Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda |
author_facet | Cabedo-Peris, Javier Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda |
author_sort | Cabedo-Peris, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach’s α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I(2) = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach’s α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8775461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87754612022-01-21 Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Cabedo-Peris, Javier Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda Healthcare (Basel) Review The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach’s α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I(2) = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach’s α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8775461/ /pubmed/35052193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cabedo-Peris, Javier Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Ortiz-Morán, Mafalda Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title | Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cabedoperisjavier basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis AT martivilarmanuel basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis AT merinosotocesar basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis AT ortizmoranmafalda basicempathyscaleasystematicreviewandreliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysis |