Cargando…

Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster

After the devastating wildfire that destroyed most of the town of Paradise, California in 2018, volatile organic compounds were found in water distribution pipes. Approximately 11 months after the fire, we collected tap water samples from 136 homes that were still standing and tested for over 100 ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Von Behren, Julie, Wong, Michelle, Morales, Daniela, Reynolds, Peggy, English, Paul B., Solomon, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020907
_version_ 1784636670109286400
author Von Behren, Julie
Wong, Michelle
Morales, Daniela
Reynolds, Peggy
English, Paul B.
Solomon, Gina
author_facet Von Behren, Julie
Wong, Michelle
Morales, Daniela
Reynolds, Peggy
English, Paul B.
Solomon, Gina
author_sort Von Behren, Julie
collection PubMed
description After the devastating wildfire that destroyed most of the town of Paradise, California in 2018, volatile organic compounds were found in water distribution pipes. Approximately 11 months after the fire, we collected tap water samples from 136 homes that were still standing and tested for over 100 chemicals. Each participant received a customized report showing the laboratory findings from their sample. Our goal was to communicate individual water results and chemical information rapidly in a way that was understandable, scientifically accurate, and useful to participants. On the basis of this process, we developed a framework to illustrate considerations and priorities that draw from best practices of previous environmental results return research and crisis communication, while also addressing challenges specific to the disaster context. We also conducted a follow-up survey on participants’ perceptions of the results return process. In general, participants found the results return communications to be understandable, and they felt less worried about their drinking water quality after receiving the information. Over one-third of the participants reported taking some kind of action around their water usage habits after receiving their results. Communication with participants is a critical element of environmental disaster research, and it is important to have a strategy to communicate results that achieves the goals of timeliness, clarity, and scientific accuracy, ultimately empowering people toward actions that can reduce exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87757802022-01-21 Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster Von Behren, Julie Wong, Michelle Morales, Daniela Reynolds, Peggy English, Paul B. Solomon, Gina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article After the devastating wildfire that destroyed most of the town of Paradise, California in 2018, volatile organic compounds were found in water distribution pipes. Approximately 11 months after the fire, we collected tap water samples from 136 homes that were still standing and tested for over 100 chemicals. Each participant received a customized report showing the laboratory findings from their sample. Our goal was to communicate individual water results and chemical information rapidly in a way that was understandable, scientifically accurate, and useful to participants. On the basis of this process, we developed a framework to illustrate considerations and priorities that draw from best practices of previous environmental results return research and crisis communication, while also addressing challenges specific to the disaster context. We also conducted a follow-up survey on participants’ perceptions of the results return process. In general, participants found the results return communications to be understandable, and they felt less worried about their drinking water quality after receiving the information. Over one-third of the participants reported taking some kind of action around their water usage habits after receiving their results. Communication with participants is a critical element of environmental disaster research, and it is important to have a strategy to communicate results that achieves the goals of timeliness, clarity, and scientific accuracy, ultimately empowering people toward actions that can reduce exposure. MDPI 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8775780/ /pubmed/35055730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020907 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Von Behren, Julie
Wong, Michelle
Morales, Daniela
Reynolds, Peggy
English, Paul B.
Solomon, Gina
Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title_full Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title_fullStr Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title_full_unstemmed Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title_short Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
title_sort returning individual tap water testing results to research study participants after a wildfire disaster
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020907
work_keys_str_mv AT vonbehrenjulie returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster
AT wongmichelle returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster
AT moralesdaniela returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster
AT reynoldspeggy returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster
AT englishpaulb returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster
AT solomongina returningindividualtapwatertestingresultstoresearchstudyparticipantsafterawildfiredisaster