Cargando…

Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a fairly recent breast imaging technique invented to overcome the challenges of overlapping breast tissue. Ultrasonography (USG) was used as a complementary tool to DBT for the purpose of this study. Nonetheless, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goh, Janice Hui Ling, Tan, Toh Leong, Aziz, Suraya, Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020759
_version_ 1784636694678470656
author Goh, Janice Hui Ling
Tan, Toh Leong
Aziz, Suraya
Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain
author_facet Goh, Janice Hui Ling
Tan, Toh Leong
Aziz, Suraya
Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain
author_sort Goh, Janice Hui Ling
collection PubMed
description Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a fairly recent breast imaging technique invented to overcome the challenges of overlapping breast tissue. Ultrasonography (USG) was used as a complementary tool to DBT for the purpose of this study. Nonetheless, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most sensitive tool to detect breast lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of DBT, with and without USG, versus breast MRI in correlation to histopathological examination (HPE). This was a retrospective study in a university hospital over a duration of 24 months. Findings were acquired from a formal report and were correlated with HPE. The sensitivity of DBT with or without USG was lower than MRI. However, the accuracy, specificity and PPV were raised with the aid of USG to equivalent or better than MRI. These three modalities showed statistically significant in correlation with HPE (p < 0.005, chi-squared). Generally, DBT alone has lower sensitivity as compared to MRI. However, it is reassuring that DBT + USG could significantly improve diagnostic performance to that comparable to MRI. In conclusion, results of this study are vital to centers which do not have MRI, as complementary ultrasound can accentuate diagnostic performance of DBT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8775881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87758812022-01-21 Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion Goh, Janice Hui Ling Tan, Toh Leong Aziz, Suraya Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a fairly recent breast imaging technique invented to overcome the challenges of overlapping breast tissue. Ultrasonography (USG) was used as a complementary tool to DBT for the purpose of this study. Nonetheless, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most sensitive tool to detect breast lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of DBT, with and without USG, versus breast MRI in correlation to histopathological examination (HPE). This was a retrospective study in a university hospital over a duration of 24 months. Findings were acquired from a formal report and were correlated with HPE. The sensitivity of DBT with or without USG was lower than MRI. However, the accuracy, specificity and PPV were raised with the aid of USG to equivalent or better than MRI. These three modalities showed statistically significant in correlation with HPE (p < 0.005, chi-squared). Generally, DBT alone has lower sensitivity as compared to MRI. However, it is reassuring that DBT + USG could significantly improve diagnostic performance to that comparable to MRI. In conclusion, results of this study are vital to centers which do not have MRI, as complementary ultrasound can accentuate diagnostic performance of DBT. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8775881/ /pubmed/35055581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020759 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goh, Janice Hui Ling
Tan, Toh Leong
Aziz, Suraya
Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain
Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title_full Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title_short Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion
title_sort comparative study of digital breast tomosynthesis (dbt) with and without ultrasound versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (mri) in detecting breast lesion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020759
work_keys_str_mv AT gohjanicehuiling comparativestudyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtwithandwithoutultrasoundversusbreastmagneticresonanceimagingmriindetectingbreastlesion
AT tantohleong comparativestudyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtwithandwithoutultrasoundversusbreastmagneticresonanceimagingmriindetectingbreastlesion
AT azizsuraya comparativestudyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtwithandwithoutultrasoundversusbreastmagneticresonanceimagingmriindetectingbreastlesion
AT rizuanaiqbalhussain comparativestudyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtwithandwithoutultrasoundversusbreastmagneticresonanceimagingmriindetectingbreastlesion