Cargando…
The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders
Background. The study deals with the introduction of the artificial intelligence in digital radiology. There is a growing interest in this area of scientific research in acceptance and consensus studies involving both insiders and the public, based on surveys focused mainly on single professionals....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010153 |
_version_ | 1784636722103975936 |
---|---|
author | Di Basilio, Francesco Esposisto, Gianluca Monoscalco, Lisa Giansanti, Daniele |
author_facet | Di Basilio, Francesco Esposisto, Gianluca Monoscalco, Lisa Giansanti, Daniele |
author_sort | Di Basilio, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The study deals with the introduction of the artificial intelligence in digital radiology. There is a growing interest in this area of scientific research in acceptance and consensus studies involving both insiders and the public, based on surveys focused mainly on single professionals. Purpose. The goal of the study is to perform a contemporary investigation on the acceptance and the consensus of the three key professional figures approaching in this field of application: (1) Medical specialists in image diagnostics: the medical specialists (MS)s; (2) experts in physical imaging processes: the medical physicists (MP)s; (3) AI designers: specialists of applied sciences (SAS)s. Methods. Participants (MSs = 92: 48 males/44 females, averaged age 37.9; MPs = 91: 43 males/48 females, averaged age 36.1; SAS = 90: 47 males/43 females, averaged age 37.3) were properly recruited based on specific training. An electronic survey was designed and submitted to the participants with a wide range questions starting from the training and background up to the different applications of the AI and the environment of application. Results. The results show that generally, the three professionals show (a) a high degree of encouraging agreement on the introduction of AI both in imaging and in non-imaging applications using both standalone applications and/or mHealth/eHealth, and (b) a different consent on AI use depending on the training background. Conclusions. The study highlights the usefulness of focusing on both the three key professionals and the usefulness of the investigation schemes facing a wide range of issues. The study also suggests the importance of different methods of administration to improve the adhesion and the need to continue these investigations both with federated and specific initiatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8775988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87759882022-01-21 The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders Di Basilio, Francesco Esposisto, Gianluca Monoscalco, Lisa Giansanti, Daniele Healthcare (Basel) Article Background. The study deals with the introduction of the artificial intelligence in digital radiology. There is a growing interest in this area of scientific research in acceptance and consensus studies involving both insiders and the public, based on surveys focused mainly on single professionals. Purpose. The goal of the study is to perform a contemporary investigation on the acceptance and the consensus of the three key professional figures approaching in this field of application: (1) Medical specialists in image diagnostics: the medical specialists (MS)s; (2) experts in physical imaging processes: the medical physicists (MP)s; (3) AI designers: specialists of applied sciences (SAS)s. Methods. Participants (MSs = 92: 48 males/44 females, averaged age 37.9; MPs = 91: 43 males/48 females, averaged age 36.1; SAS = 90: 47 males/43 females, averaged age 37.3) were properly recruited based on specific training. An electronic survey was designed and submitted to the participants with a wide range questions starting from the training and background up to the different applications of the AI and the environment of application. Results. The results show that generally, the three professionals show (a) a high degree of encouraging agreement on the introduction of AI both in imaging and in non-imaging applications using both standalone applications and/or mHealth/eHealth, and (b) a different consent on AI use depending on the training background. Conclusions. The study highlights the usefulness of focusing on both the three key professionals and the usefulness of the investigation schemes facing a wide range of issues. The study also suggests the importance of different methods of administration to improve the adhesion and the need to continue these investigations both with federated and specific initiatives. MDPI 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8775988/ /pubmed/35052316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010153 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Di Basilio, Francesco Esposisto, Gianluca Monoscalco, Lisa Giansanti, Daniele The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title | The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title_full | The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title_fullStr | The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title_full_unstemmed | The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title_short | The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in digital radiology: part 2: towards an investigation of acceptance and consensus on the insiders |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dibasiliofrancesco theartificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT esposistogianluca theartificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT monoscalcolisa theartificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT giansantidaniele theartificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT dibasiliofrancesco artificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT esposistogianluca artificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT monoscalcolisa artificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders AT giansantidaniele artificialintelligenceindigitalradiologypart2towardsaninvestigationofacceptanceandconsensusontheinsiders |