Cargando…
Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones
Amine transaminases (ATAs) are pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes that catalyze the transfer of an amino group from an amino donor to an aldehyde and/or ketone. In the past decade, the enzymatic reductive amination of prochiral ketones catalyzed by ATAs has attracted the attention of res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020777 |
_version_ | 1784636776145485824 |
---|---|
author | Teixeira, Iris S. Farias, André B. Horta, Bruno A. C. Milagre, Humberto M. S. de Souza, Rodrigo O. M. A. Bornscheuer, Uwe T. Milagre, Cintia D. F. |
author_facet | Teixeira, Iris S. Farias, André B. Horta, Bruno A. C. Milagre, Humberto M. S. de Souza, Rodrigo O. M. A. Bornscheuer, Uwe T. Milagre, Cintia D. F. |
author_sort | Teixeira, Iris S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amine transaminases (ATAs) are pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes that catalyze the transfer of an amino group from an amino donor to an aldehyde and/or ketone. In the past decade, the enzymatic reductive amination of prochiral ketones catalyzed by ATAs has attracted the attention of researchers, and more traditional chemical routes were replaced by enzymatic ones in industrial manufacturing. In the present work, the influence of the presence of an α,β-unsaturated system in a methylketone model substrate was investigated, using a set of five wild-type ATAs, the (R)-selective from Aspergillus terreus (Atr-TA) and Mycobacterium vanbaalenii (Mva-TA), the (S)-selective from Chromobacterium violaceum (Cvi-TA), Ruegeria pomeroyi (Rpo-TA), V. fluvialis (Vfl-TA) and an engineered variant of V. fluvialis (ATA-256 from Codexis). The high conversion rate (80 to 99%) and optical purity (78 to 99% ee) of both (R)- and (S)-ATAs for the substrate 1-phenyl-3-butanone, using isopropylamine (IPA) as an amino donor, were observed. However, the double bond in the α,β-position of 4-phenylbut-3-en-2-one dramatically reduced wild-type ATA reactivity, leading to conversions of <10% (without affecting the enantioselectivity). In contrast, the commercially engineered V. fluvialis variant, ATA-256, still enabled an 87% conversion, yielding a corresponding amine with >99% ee. Computational docking simulations showed the differences in orientation and intermolecular interactions in the active sites, providing insights to rationalize the observed experimental results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8776209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87762092022-01-21 Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones Teixeira, Iris S. Farias, André B. Horta, Bruno A. C. Milagre, Humberto M. S. de Souza, Rodrigo O. M. A. Bornscheuer, Uwe T. Milagre, Cintia D. F. Int J Mol Sci Article Amine transaminases (ATAs) are pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes that catalyze the transfer of an amino group from an amino donor to an aldehyde and/or ketone. In the past decade, the enzymatic reductive amination of prochiral ketones catalyzed by ATAs has attracted the attention of researchers, and more traditional chemical routes were replaced by enzymatic ones in industrial manufacturing. In the present work, the influence of the presence of an α,β-unsaturated system in a methylketone model substrate was investigated, using a set of five wild-type ATAs, the (R)-selective from Aspergillus terreus (Atr-TA) and Mycobacterium vanbaalenii (Mva-TA), the (S)-selective from Chromobacterium violaceum (Cvi-TA), Ruegeria pomeroyi (Rpo-TA), V. fluvialis (Vfl-TA) and an engineered variant of V. fluvialis (ATA-256 from Codexis). The high conversion rate (80 to 99%) and optical purity (78 to 99% ee) of both (R)- and (S)-ATAs for the substrate 1-phenyl-3-butanone, using isopropylamine (IPA) as an amino donor, were observed. However, the double bond in the α,β-position of 4-phenylbut-3-en-2-one dramatically reduced wild-type ATA reactivity, leading to conversions of <10% (without affecting the enantioselectivity). In contrast, the commercially engineered V. fluvialis variant, ATA-256, still enabled an 87% conversion, yielding a corresponding amine with >99% ee. Computational docking simulations showed the differences in orientation and intermolecular interactions in the active sites, providing insights to rationalize the observed experimental results. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8776209/ /pubmed/35054965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020777 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Teixeira, Iris S. Farias, André B. Horta, Bruno A. C. Milagre, Humberto M. S. de Souza, Rodrigo O. M. A. Bornscheuer, Uwe T. Milagre, Cintia D. F. Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title | Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title_full | Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title_fullStr | Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title_full_unstemmed | Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title_short | Computer Modeling Explains the Structural Reasons for the Difference in Reactivity of Amine Transaminases Regarding Prochiral Methylketones |
title_sort | computer modeling explains the structural reasons for the difference in reactivity of amine transaminases regarding prochiral methylketones |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teixeirairiss computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT fariasandreb computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT hortabrunoac computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT milagrehumbertoms computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT desouzarodrigooma computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT bornscheueruwet computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones AT milagrecintiadf computermodelingexplainsthestructuralreasonsforthedifferenceinreactivityofaminetransaminasesregardingprochiralmethylketones |