Cargando…
Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8 |
_version_ | 1784636909425786880 |
---|---|
author | Sanghavi, Kunal Cohn, Betty Prince, Anya E. R. Feero, W. Gregory Ryan, Kerry A. Spector-Bagdady, Kayte Uhlmann, Wendy R. Lee, Charles Roberts, J. Scott Mathews, Debra J. H. |
author_facet | Sanghavi, Kunal Cohn, Betty Prince, Anya E. R. Feero, W. Gregory Ryan, Kerry A. Spector-Bagdady, Kayte Uhlmann, Wendy R. Lee, Charles Roberts, J. Scott Mathews, Debra J. H. |
author_sort | Sanghavi, Kunal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are expanding their customer base by marketing genetic and genomic testing services, including testing for pharmacogenomic and pathogenic variants, to employers for inclusion in workplace wellness programs. We describe the appeal of voluntary workplace genomic testing (wGT) to employers and employees, how the ethical, legal, and social implications literature has approached the issue of genetic testing in the workplace in the past, and outline the relevant legal landscape. Given that we are in the early stages of development of the wGT market, now is the time to identify the critical interests and concerns of employees and employers, so that governance can develop and evolve along with the wGT market, rather than behind it, and be based on data, rather than speculative hopes and fears. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8776773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87767732022-02-04 Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? Sanghavi, Kunal Cohn, Betty Prince, Anya E. R. Feero, W. Gregory Ryan, Kerry A. Spector-Bagdady, Kayte Uhlmann, Wendy R. Lee, Charles Roberts, J. Scott Mathews, Debra J. H. NPJ Genom Med Perspective Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are expanding their customer base by marketing genetic and genomic testing services, including testing for pharmacogenomic and pathogenic variants, to employers for inclusion in workplace wellness programs. We describe the appeal of voluntary workplace genomic testing (wGT) to employers and employees, how the ethical, legal, and social implications literature has approached the issue of genetic testing in the workplace in the past, and outline the relevant legal landscape. Given that we are in the early stages of development of the wGT market, now is the time to identify the critical interests and concerns of employees and employers, so that governance can develop and evolve along with the wGT market, rather than behind it, and be based on data, rather than speculative hopes and fears. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8776773/ /pubmed/35058451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Sanghavi, Kunal Cohn, Betty Prince, Anya E. R. Feero, W. Gregory Ryan, Kerry A. Spector-Bagdady, Kayte Uhlmann, Wendy R. Lee, Charles Roberts, J. Scott Mathews, Debra J. H. Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title | Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title_full | Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title_fullStr | Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title_full_unstemmed | Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title_short | Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? |
title_sort | voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or pandora’s box? |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanghavikunal voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT cohnbetty voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT princeanyaer voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT feerowgregory voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT ryankerrya voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT spectorbagdadykayte voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT uhlmannwendyr voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT leecharles voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT robertsjscott voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox AT mathewsdebrajh voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox |