Cargando…

Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?

Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanghavi, Kunal, Cohn, Betty, Prince, Anya E. R., Feero, W. Gregory, Ryan, Kerry A., Spector-Bagdady, Kayte, Uhlmann, Wendy R., Lee, Charles, Roberts, J. Scott, Mathews, Debra J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8
_version_ 1784636909425786880
author Sanghavi, Kunal
Cohn, Betty
Prince, Anya E. R.
Feero, W. Gregory
Ryan, Kerry A.
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Lee, Charles
Roberts, J. Scott
Mathews, Debra J. H.
author_facet Sanghavi, Kunal
Cohn, Betty
Prince, Anya E. R.
Feero, W. Gregory
Ryan, Kerry A.
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Lee, Charles
Roberts, J. Scott
Mathews, Debra J. H.
author_sort Sanghavi, Kunal
collection PubMed
description Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are expanding their customer base by marketing genetic and genomic testing services, including testing for pharmacogenomic and pathogenic variants, to employers for inclusion in workplace wellness programs. We describe the appeal of voluntary workplace genomic testing (wGT) to employers and employees, how the ethical, legal, and social implications literature has approached the issue of genetic testing in the workplace in the past, and outline the relevant legal landscape. Given that we are in the early stages of development of the wGT market, now is the time to identify the critical interests and concerns of employees and employers, so that governance can develop and evolve along with the wGT market, rather than behind it, and be based on data, rather than speculative hopes and fears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8776773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87767732022-02-04 Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? Sanghavi, Kunal Cohn, Betty Prince, Anya E. R. Feero, W. Gregory Ryan, Kerry A. Spector-Bagdady, Kayte Uhlmann, Wendy R. Lee, Charles Roberts, J. Scott Mathews, Debra J. H. NPJ Genom Med Perspective Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are expanding their customer base by marketing genetic and genomic testing services, including testing for pharmacogenomic and pathogenic variants, to employers for inclusion in workplace wellness programs. We describe the appeal of voluntary workplace genomic testing (wGT) to employers and employees, how the ethical, legal, and social implications literature has approached the issue of genetic testing in the workplace in the past, and outline the relevant legal landscape. Given that we are in the early stages of development of the wGT market, now is the time to identify the critical interests and concerns of employees and employers, so that governance can develop and evolve along with the wGT market, rather than behind it, and be based on data, rather than speculative hopes and fears. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8776773/ /pubmed/35058451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Sanghavi, Kunal
Cohn, Betty
Prince, Anya E. R.
Feero, W. Gregory
Ryan, Kerry A.
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Lee, Charles
Roberts, J. Scott
Mathews, Debra J. H.
Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title_full Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title_fullStr Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title_full_unstemmed Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title_short Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?
title_sort voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or pandora’s box?
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sanghavikunal voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT cohnbetty voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT princeanyaer voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT feerowgregory voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT ryankerrya voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT spectorbagdadykayte voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT uhlmannwendyr voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT leecharles voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT robertsjscott voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox
AT mathewsdebrajh voluntaryworkplacegenomictestingwellnessbenefitorpandorasbox