Cargando…
Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review
AIM: To compare the real-world effectiveness of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with insulin in injectable-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A non-interventional, non-randomised, observational, single-site retrospective chart review enrolled 150 patients, 75 receiving dula...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01184-x |
_version_ | 1784636945772576768 |
---|---|
author | Houssarini, Jared A. Brnabic, Alan J. M. Obaid, Marwan |
author_facet | Houssarini, Jared A. Brnabic, Alan J. M. Obaid, Marwan |
author_sort | Houssarini, Jared A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the real-world effectiveness of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with insulin in injectable-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A non-interventional, non-randomised, observational, single-site retrospective chart review enrolled 150 patients, 75 receiving dulaglutide or insulin. Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients with T2DM who were initiated on insulin between October 2010 and May 2017, and patients initiated on dulaglutide between May 2018 and October 2019. A doubly robust approach was used to adjust for potential selection bias with augmented inverse probability weights used to estimate the average treatment effect. RESULTS: HbA1c favoured dulaglutide with an average change of − 1.6% vs − 0.8% for insulin, with an average treatment effect difference of 0.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–1.2%) at 3 months. At 6 months, 58.7% of the dulaglutide group reached a target HbA1c of ≤ 7% compared with 20.0% of the insulin group: average treatment effect difference of 21.3% (95% CI 2.7–43.1). The dulaglutide group lost 2.4 kg compared to the insulin group which gained 2.0 kg: average difference of 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.6–7.3) at 6 months. The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was 12 (16.0%) occurrences in the dulaglutide group compared to 33 (44.0%) in the insulin group. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly dulaglutide demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction, weight loss and reduced hypoglycaemia compared to insulin, in a real-world practice setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8776933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87769332022-02-02 Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review Houssarini, Jared A. Brnabic, Alan J. M. Obaid, Marwan Diabetes Ther Original Research AIM: To compare the real-world effectiveness of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with insulin in injectable-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A non-interventional, non-randomised, observational, single-site retrospective chart review enrolled 150 patients, 75 receiving dulaglutide or insulin. Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients with T2DM who were initiated on insulin between October 2010 and May 2017, and patients initiated on dulaglutide between May 2018 and October 2019. A doubly robust approach was used to adjust for potential selection bias with augmented inverse probability weights used to estimate the average treatment effect. RESULTS: HbA1c favoured dulaglutide with an average change of − 1.6% vs − 0.8% for insulin, with an average treatment effect difference of 0.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–1.2%) at 3 months. At 6 months, 58.7% of the dulaglutide group reached a target HbA1c of ≤ 7% compared with 20.0% of the insulin group: average treatment effect difference of 21.3% (95% CI 2.7–43.1). The dulaglutide group lost 2.4 kg compared to the insulin group which gained 2.0 kg: average difference of 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.6–7.3) at 6 months. The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was 12 (16.0%) occurrences in the dulaglutide group compared to 33 (44.0%) in the insulin group. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly dulaglutide demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction, weight loss and reduced hypoglycaemia compared to insulin, in a real-world practice setting. Springer Healthcare 2021-11-30 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8776933/ /pubmed/34850355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01184-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Houssarini, Jared A. Brnabic, Alan J. M. Obaid, Marwan Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title | Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title_full | Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title_fullStr | Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title_short | Comparing Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide and Insulin as the First Injectable for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Australian Single-Site Retrospective Chart Review |
title_sort | comparing real-world effectiveness of dulaglutide and insulin as the first injectable for patients with type 2 diabetes: an australian single-site retrospective chart review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01184-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houssarinijareda comparingrealworldeffectivenessofdulaglutideandinsulinasthefirstinjectableforpatientswithtype2diabetesanaustraliansinglesiteretrospectivechartreview AT brnabicalanjm comparingrealworldeffectivenessofdulaglutideandinsulinasthefirstinjectableforpatientswithtype2diabetesanaustraliansinglesiteretrospectivechartreview AT obaidmarwan comparingrealworldeffectivenessofdulaglutideandinsulinasthefirstinjectableforpatientswithtype2diabetesanaustraliansinglesiteretrospectivechartreview |