Cargando…

Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization

BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guelker, Jan-Erik, Kinoshita, Yoshihisa, Weber-Albers, Joachim, Bufe, Alexander, Blockhaus, Christian, Mashayekhi, Kambis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942
_version_ 1784637032497152000
author Guelker, Jan-Erik
Kinoshita, Yoshihisa
Weber-Albers, Joachim
Bufe, Alexander
Blockhaus, Christian
Mashayekhi, Kambis
author_facet Guelker, Jan-Erik
Kinoshita, Yoshihisa
Weber-Albers, Joachim
Bufe, Alexander
Blockhaus, Christian
Mashayekhi, Kambis
author_sort Guelker, Jan-Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product. CONCLUSION: Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8777279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87772792022-01-24 Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization Guelker, Jan-Erik Kinoshita, Yoshihisa Weber-Albers, Joachim Bufe, Alexander Blockhaus, Christian Mashayekhi, Kambis Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Review BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product. CONCLUSION: Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI. Elsevier 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8777279/ /pubmed/35079620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Guelker, Jan-Erik
Kinoshita, Yoshihisa
Weber-Albers, Joachim
Bufe, Alexander
Blockhaus, Christian
Mashayekhi, Kambis
Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title_full Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title_fullStr Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title_short Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
title_sort validation of the newly introduced castle score for predicting successful cto recanalization
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942
work_keys_str_mv AT guelkerjanerik validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization
AT kinoshitayoshihisa validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization
AT weberalbersjoachim validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization
AT bufealexander validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization
AT blockhauschristian validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization
AT mashayekhikambis validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization