Cargando…
Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization
BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942 |
_version_ | 1784637032497152000 |
---|---|
author | Guelker, Jan-Erik Kinoshita, Yoshihisa Weber-Albers, Joachim Bufe, Alexander Blockhaus, Christian Mashayekhi, Kambis |
author_facet | Guelker, Jan-Erik Kinoshita, Yoshihisa Weber-Albers, Joachim Bufe, Alexander Blockhaus, Christian Mashayekhi, Kambis |
author_sort | Guelker, Jan-Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product. CONCLUSION: Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8777279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87772792022-01-24 Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization Guelker, Jan-Erik Kinoshita, Yoshihisa Weber-Albers, Joachim Bufe, Alexander Blockhaus, Christian Mashayekhi, Kambis Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Review BACKGROUND: The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product. CONCLUSION: Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI. Elsevier 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8777279/ /pubmed/35079620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Guelker, Jan-Erik Kinoshita, Yoshihisa Weber-Albers, Joachim Bufe, Alexander Blockhaus, Christian Mashayekhi, Kambis Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title | Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title_full | Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title_fullStr | Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title_short | Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization |
title_sort | validation of the newly introduced castle score for predicting successful cto recanalization |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guelkerjanerik validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization AT kinoshitayoshihisa validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization AT weberalbersjoachim validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization AT bufealexander validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization AT blockhauschristian validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization AT mashayekhikambis validationofthenewlyintroducedcastlescoreforpredictingsuccessfulctorecanalization |