Cargando…
Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7067 |
_version_ | 1784637096029323264 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Gubbins, Simon Stegeman, Jan Arend Thiaucourt, François Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Aznar, Inma Papanikolaou, Alexandra Zancanaro, Gabriele Roberts, Helen Clare |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Gubbins, Simon Stegeman, Jan Arend Thiaucourt, François Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Aznar, Inma Papanikolaou, Alexandra Zancanaro, Gabriele Roberts, Helen Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia (CBPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and (iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as not effective and at least 90 days (3 months) is recommended in affected areas where high awareness is expected; when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, the effectiveness of surveillance and protection zones for CBPP was based on expert knowledge. A surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective, while a protection zone including establishments adjacent to affected ones is recommended. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CBPP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8777562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87775622022-01-24 Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Gubbins, Simon Stegeman, Jan Arend Thiaucourt, François Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Aznar, Inma Papanikolaou, Alexandra Zancanaro, Gabriele Roberts, Helen Clare EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia (CBPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and (iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as not effective and at least 90 days (3 months) is recommended in affected areas where high awareness is expected; when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, the effectiveness of surveillance and protection zones for CBPP was based on expert knowledge. A surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective, while a protection zone including establishments adjacent to affected ones is recommended. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CBPP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8777562/ /pubmed/35079288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7067 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Gubbins, Simon Stegeman, Jan Arend Thiaucourt, François Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Aznar, Inma Papanikolaou, Alexandra Zancanaro, Gabriele Roberts, Helen Clare Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title | Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title_full | Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title_short | Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia |
title_sort | assessment of the control measures for category a diseases of animal health law: contagious bovine pleuropneumonia |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT gortazarchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT spoolderhans assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT velardeantonio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT gubbinssimon assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT stegemanjanarend assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT thiaucourtfrancois assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT antoniousotiriaeleni assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT aznarinma assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT papanikolaoualexandra assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT zancanarogabriele assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia AT robertshelenclare assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresforcategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawcontagiousbovinepleuropneumonia |