Cargando…

The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?

To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R., Lilly, Sonia T., Pearson, Michael N., Higgins, Colleen M., MacDiarmid, Robin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188
_version_ 1784637102469677056
author Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R.
Lilly, Sonia T.
Pearson, Michael N.
Higgins, Colleen M.
MacDiarmid, Robin M.
author_facet Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R.
Lilly, Sonia T.
Pearson, Michael N.
Higgins, Colleen M.
MacDiarmid, Robin M.
author_sort Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R.
collection PubMed
description To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (AtSGS3) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (AtCPK3) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. AtSGS3 transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while AtCPK3 transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8777591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87775912022-01-22 The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. Lilly, Sonia T. Pearson, Michael N. Higgins, Colleen M. MacDiarmid, Robin M. Plants (Basel) Article To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (AtSGS3) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (AtCPK3) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. AtSGS3 transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while AtCPK3 transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8777591/ /pubmed/35050076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R.
Lilly, Sonia T.
Pearson, Michael N.
Higgins, Colleen M.
MacDiarmid, Robin M.
The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_full The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_fullStr The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_full_unstemmed The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_short The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_sort potential of molecular indicators of plant virus infection: are plants able to tell us they are infected?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188
work_keys_str_mv AT valmontecortesgardetter thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT lillysoniat thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT pearsonmichaeln thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT higginscolleenm thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT macdiarmidrobinm thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT valmontecortesgardetter potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT lillysoniat potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT pearsonmichaeln potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT higginscolleenm potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT macdiarmidrobinm potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected