Cargando…
The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188 |
_version_ | 1784637102469677056 |
---|---|
author | Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. Lilly, Sonia T. Pearson, Michael N. Higgins, Colleen M. MacDiarmid, Robin M. |
author_facet | Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. Lilly, Sonia T. Pearson, Michael N. Higgins, Colleen M. MacDiarmid, Robin M. |
author_sort | Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (AtSGS3) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (AtCPK3) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. AtSGS3 transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while AtCPK3 transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8777591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87775912022-01-22 The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. Lilly, Sonia T. Pearson, Michael N. Higgins, Colleen M. MacDiarmid, Robin M. Plants (Basel) Article To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (AtSGS3) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (AtCPK3) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. AtSGS3 transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while AtCPK3 transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8777591/ /pubmed/35050076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Valmonte-Cortes, Gardette R. Lilly, Sonia T. Pearson, Michael N. Higgins, Colleen M. MacDiarmid, Robin M. The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title | The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title_full | The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title_fullStr | The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title_short | The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected? |
title_sort | potential of molecular indicators of plant virus infection: are plants able to tell us they are infected? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valmontecortesgardetter thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT lillysoniat thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT pearsonmichaeln thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT higginscolleenm thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT macdiarmidrobinm thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT valmontecortesgardetter potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT lillysoniat potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT pearsonmichaeln potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT higginscolleenm potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected AT macdiarmidrobinm potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected |