Cargando…

Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties

This study aimed to determine the microplastic prevalence in eastern oysters (C. virginica) in three sites in the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia and optimize the digestion methods. The digestion results illustrate that the lowest recovery rate and digestion recovery were related to enzymatic, enzymatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aung, Thet, Batish, Inayat, Ovissipour, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35051071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10010029
_version_ 1784637192697544704
author Aung, Thet
Batish, Inayat
Ovissipour, Reza
author_facet Aung, Thet
Batish, Inayat
Ovissipour, Reza
author_sort Aung, Thet
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine the microplastic prevalence in eastern oysters (C. virginica) in three sites in the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia and optimize the digestion methods. The digestion results illustrate that the lowest recovery rate and digestion recovery were related to enzymatic, enzymatic + hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), and HCl 5% treatments, while the highest digestion recovery and recovery rate were observed in H(2)O(2) and basic (KOH) treatments. Nitric acid digestion resulted in satisfying digestion recovery (100%), while no blue polyethylene microplastics were observed due to the poor recovery rate. In addition, nitric acid altered the color, changed the Raman spectrum intensity, and melted polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In order to determine the number of microplastics, 144 oysters with an approximately similar size and weight from three sites, including the James River, York River, and Eastern Shore, were evaluated. Fragments were the most abundant microplastics among the different microplastics, followed by fibers and beads, in the three sites. A significantly higher number of fragments were found in the James River, probably due to the greater amount of human activities. The number of microplastics per gram of oyster tissue was higher in the James River, with 7 MPs/g tissue, than in the York River and Eastern Shore, with 6.7 and 5.6 MPs/g tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8777933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87779332022-01-22 Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties Aung, Thet Batish, Inayat Ovissipour, Reza Toxics Article This study aimed to determine the microplastic prevalence in eastern oysters (C. virginica) in three sites in the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia and optimize the digestion methods. The digestion results illustrate that the lowest recovery rate and digestion recovery were related to enzymatic, enzymatic + hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), and HCl 5% treatments, while the highest digestion recovery and recovery rate were observed in H(2)O(2) and basic (KOH) treatments. Nitric acid digestion resulted in satisfying digestion recovery (100%), while no blue polyethylene microplastics were observed due to the poor recovery rate. In addition, nitric acid altered the color, changed the Raman spectrum intensity, and melted polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In order to determine the number of microplastics, 144 oysters with an approximately similar size and weight from three sites, including the James River, York River, and Eastern Shore, were evaluated. Fragments were the most abundant microplastics among the different microplastics, followed by fibers and beads, in the three sites. A significantly higher number of fragments were found in the James River, probably due to the greater amount of human activities. The number of microplastics per gram of oyster tissue was higher in the James River, with 7 MPs/g tissue, than in the York River and Eastern Shore, with 6.7 and 5.6 MPs/g tissue. MDPI 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8777933/ /pubmed/35051071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10010029 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aung, Thet
Batish, Inayat
Ovissipour, Reza
Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title_full Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title_fullStr Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title_short Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties
title_sort prevalence of microplastics in the eastern oyster crassostrea virginica in the chesapeake bay: the impact of different digestion methods on microplastic properties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35051071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10010029
work_keys_str_mv AT aungthet prevalenceofmicroplasticsintheeasternoystercrassostreavirginicainthechesapeakebaytheimpactofdifferentdigestionmethodsonmicroplasticproperties
AT batishinayat prevalenceofmicroplasticsintheeasternoystercrassostreavirginicainthechesapeakebaytheimpactofdifferentdigestionmethodsonmicroplasticproperties
AT ovissipourreza prevalenceofmicroplasticsintheeasternoystercrassostreavirginicainthechesapeakebaytheimpactofdifferentdigestionmethodsonmicroplasticproperties