Cargando…
After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine?
In 2021, most of the world was reasonably still concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic, how cases were up and down in different countries, how the vaccination campaigns were ongoing, and most people were familiar with the speed with which vaccines against SARS-Co-V2 were developed, analyzed, and star...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10010057 |
_version_ | 1784637296642883584 |
---|---|
author | Flores-Valdez, Mario Alberto |
author_facet | Flores-Valdez, Mario Alberto |
author_sort | Flores-Valdez, Mario Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2021, most of the world was reasonably still concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic, how cases were up and down in different countries, how the vaccination campaigns were ongoing, and most people were familiar with the speed with which vaccines against SARS-Co-V2 were developed, analyzed, and started to be applied in an attempt to curb the pandemic. Because of this, it may have somehow passed relatively inadvertently for people outside of the field that the vaccine used to control tuberculosis (TB), Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), was first applied to humans a century ago. Over these years, BCG has been the vaccine applied to most human beings in the world, despite its known lack of efficacy to fully prevent respiratory TB. Several strategies have been employed in the last 20 years to produce a novel vaccine that would replace, or boost, immunity and protection elicited by BCG. In this work, to avoid potential redundancies with recently published reviews, I only aim to present my current thoughts about some of the latest findings and outstanding questions that I consider worth investigating to help develop a replacement or modified BCG in order to successfully fight TB, based on BCG itself. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8778337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87783372022-01-22 After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? Flores-Valdez, Mario Alberto Vaccines (Basel) Review In 2021, most of the world was reasonably still concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic, how cases were up and down in different countries, how the vaccination campaigns were ongoing, and most people were familiar with the speed with which vaccines against SARS-Co-V2 were developed, analyzed, and started to be applied in an attempt to curb the pandemic. Because of this, it may have somehow passed relatively inadvertently for people outside of the field that the vaccine used to control tuberculosis (TB), Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), was first applied to humans a century ago. Over these years, BCG has been the vaccine applied to most human beings in the world, despite its known lack of efficacy to fully prevent respiratory TB. Several strategies have been employed in the last 20 years to produce a novel vaccine that would replace, or boost, immunity and protection elicited by BCG. In this work, to avoid potential redundancies with recently published reviews, I only aim to present my current thoughts about some of the latest findings and outstanding questions that I consider worth investigating to help develop a replacement or modified BCG in order to successfully fight TB, based on BCG itself. MDPI 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8778337/ /pubmed/35062718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10010057 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Flores-Valdez, Mario Alberto After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title | After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title_full | After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title_fullStr | After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title_full_unstemmed | After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title_short | After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine? |
title_sort | after 100 years of bcg immunization against tuberculosis, what is new and still outstanding for this vaccine? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10010057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT floresvaldezmarioalberto after100yearsofbcgimmunizationagainsttuberculosiswhatisnewandstilloutstandingforthisvaccine |