Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity
This article reviews the use of wearable sensors for the monitoring of physical activity (PA) for different purposes, including assessment of gait and balance, prevention and/or detection of falls, recognition of various PAs, conduction and assessment of rehabilitation exercises and monitoring of ne...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020573 |
_version_ | 1784637350175834112 |
---|---|
author | Kristoffersson, Annica Lindén, Maria |
author_facet | Kristoffersson, Annica Lindén, Maria |
author_sort | Kristoffersson, Annica |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article reviews the use of wearable sensors for the monitoring of physical activity (PA) for different purposes, including assessment of gait and balance, prevention and/or detection of falls, recognition of various PAs, conduction and assessment of rehabilitation exercises and monitoring of neurological disease progression. The article provides in-depth information on the retrieved articles and discusses study shortcomings related to demographic factors, i.e., age, gender, healthy participants vs patients, and study conditions. It is well known that motion patterns change with age and the onset of illnesses, and that the risk of falling increases with age. Yet, studies including older persons are rare. Gender distribution was not even provided in several studies, and others included only, or a majority of, men. Another shortcoming is that none of the studies were conducted in real-life conditions. Hence, there is still important work to be done in order to increase the usefulness of wearable sensors in these areas. The article highlights flaws in how studies based on previously collected datasets report on study samples and the data collected, which makes the validity and generalizability of those studies low. Exceptions exist, such as the promising recently reported open dataset FallAllD, wherein a longitudinal study with older adults is ongoing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8778538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87785382022-01-22 A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity Kristoffersson, Annica Lindén, Maria Sensors (Basel) Review This article reviews the use of wearable sensors for the monitoring of physical activity (PA) for different purposes, including assessment of gait and balance, prevention and/or detection of falls, recognition of various PAs, conduction and assessment of rehabilitation exercises and monitoring of neurological disease progression. The article provides in-depth information on the retrieved articles and discusses study shortcomings related to demographic factors, i.e., age, gender, healthy participants vs patients, and study conditions. It is well known that motion patterns change with age and the onset of illnesses, and that the risk of falling increases with age. Yet, studies including older persons are rare. Gender distribution was not even provided in several studies, and others included only, or a majority of, men. Another shortcoming is that none of the studies were conducted in real-life conditions. Hence, there is still important work to be done in order to increase the usefulness of wearable sensors in these areas. The article highlights flaws in how studies based on previously collected datasets report on study samples and the data collected, which makes the validity and generalizability of those studies low. Exceptions exist, such as the promising recently reported open dataset FallAllD, wherein a longitudinal study with older adults is ongoing. MDPI 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8778538/ /pubmed/35062531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020573 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kristoffersson, Annica Lindén, Maria A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title | A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity |
title_sort | systematic review of wearable sensors for monitoring physical activity |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kristofferssonannica asystematicreviewofwearablesensorsformonitoringphysicalactivity AT lindenmaria asystematicreviewofwearablesensorsformonitoringphysicalactivity AT kristofferssonannica systematicreviewofwearablesensorsformonitoringphysicalactivity AT lindenmaria systematicreviewofwearablesensorsformonitoringphysicalactivity |