Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of empyema is challenging because current literature features multiple overlapping pleural findings. We aimed to identify informative findings for structured reporting. The screening according to inclusion criteria (P: Pleural empyema, I: CT C: culture/gram-stain/p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zettinig, Desiree, D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci, Wilder-Smith, Adrian, Bremerich, Jens, Roth, Jan A., Sexauer, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8010003
_version_ 1784637463389536256
author Zettinig, Desiree
D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci
Wilder-Smith, Adrian
Bremerich, Jens
Roth, Jan A.
Sexauer, Raphael
author_facet Zettinig, Desiree
D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci
Wilder-Smith, Adrian
Bremerich, Jens
Roth, Jan A.
Sexauer, Raphael
author_sort Zettinig, Desiree
collection PubMed
description Computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of empyema is challenging because current literature features multiple overlapping pleural findings. We aimed to identify informative findings for structured reporting. The screening according to inclusion criteria (P: Pleural empyema, I: CT C: culture/gram-stain/pathology/pus, O: Diagnostic accuracy measures), data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of studies published between 01-1980 and 10-2021 on Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were performed independently by two reviewers. CT findings with pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals, not including 1, were considered as informative. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy for CT findings were calculated by using a bivariate random-effects model and heterogeneity sources were evaluated. Ten studies with a total of 252 patients with and 846 without empyema were included. From 119 overlapping descriptors, five informative CT findings were identified: Pleural enhancement, thickening, loculation, fat thickening, and fat stranding with an AUC of 0.80 (hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic, HSROC). Potential sources of heterogeneity were different thresholds, empyema prevalence, and study year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8778997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87789972022-01-22 Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zettinig, Desiree D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci Wilder-Smith, Adrian Bremerich, Jens Roth, Jan A. Sexauer, Raphael J Imaging Systematic Review Computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of empyema is challenging because current literature features multiple overlapping pleural findings. We aimed to identify informative findings for structured reporting. The screening according to inclusion criteria (P: Pleural empyema, I: CT C: culture/gram-stain/pathology/pus, O: Diagnostic accuracy measures), data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of studies published between 01-1980 and 10-2021 on Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were performed independently by two reviewers. CT findings with pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals, not including 1, were considered as informative. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy for CT findings were calculated by using a bivariate random-effects model and heterogeneity sources were evaluated. Ten studies with a total of 252 patients with and 846 without empyema were included. From 119 overlapping descriptors, five informative CT findings were identified: Pleural enhancement, thickening, loculation, fat thickening, and fat stranding with an AUC of 0.80 (hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic, HSROC). Potential sources of heterogeneity were different thresholds, empyema prevalence, and study year. MDPI 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8778997/ /pubmed/35049844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8010003 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Zettinig, Desiree
D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci
Wilder-Smith, Adrian
Bremerich, Jens
Roth, Jan A.
Sexauer, Raphael
Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of imaging findings in pleural empyema: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8010003
work_keys_str_mv AT zettinigdesiree diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dantonolitugbaakinci diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wildersmithadrian diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bremerichjens diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rothjana diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sexauerraphael diagnosticaccuracyofimagingfindingsinpleuralempyemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis