Cargando…

Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock

After surviving the acute phase of resuscitation, septic shock is the cause of death in the majority of burn patients. Therefore, the management of septic shock is a cornerstone in modern burn care. Whereas sepsis therapy in general has undergone remarkable developments in the past decade, the manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehm, Dorothee, Menke, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010026
_version_ 1784637537931755520
author Boehm, Dorothee
Menke, Henrik
author_facet Boehm, Dorothee
Menke, Henrik
author_sort Boehm, Dorothee
collection PubMed
description After surviving the acute phase of resuscitation, septic shock is the cause of death in the majority of burn patients. Therefore, the management of septic shock is a cornerstone in modern burn care. Whereas sepsis therapy in general has undergone remarkable developments in the past decade, the management of septic shock in burn patients still has a long way to go. Instead, the differences of burn patients with septic shock versus general patients have been emphasized and thus, burn patients were excluded in every sepsis study which are the basis for modern sepsis therapy. However, due to the lack of evidence in burn patients, the standards of procedure for general sepsis therapy have been adopted in burn care. This review identifies the differences of burn patients with sepsis versus other septic patients and summarizes the scientific basis for modern sepsis therapy in general ICU patients and burn patients. Consequently, the results in general sepsis research should be transferred to burn care, which means the implementation of effective screening, early resuscitation, and efficient antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, on the basis of past developments and in the light of the current update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, this review introduces the “Burn SOFA score” and the “3 H’s of burn sepsis” as a screening tool for early sepsis recognition in burn patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8779285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87792852022-01-22 Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock Boehm, Dorothee Menke, Henrik Medicina (Kaunas) Review After surviving the acute phase of resuscitation, septic shock is the cause of death in the majority of burn patients. Therefore, the management of septic shock is a cornerstone in modern burn care. Whereas sepsis therapy in general has undergone remarkable developments in the past decade, the management of septic shock in burn patients still has a long way to go. Instead, the differences of burn patients with septic shock versus general patients have been emphasized and thus, burn patients were excluded in every sepsis study which are the basis for modern sepsis therapy. However, due to the lack of evidence in burn patients, the standards of procedure for general sepsis therapy have been adopted in burn care. This review identifies the differences of burn patients with sepsis versus other septic patients and summarizes the scientific basis for modern sepsis therapy in general ICU patients and burn patients. Consequently, the results in general sepsis research should be transferred to burn care, which means the implementation of effective screening, early resuscitation, and efficient antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, on the basis of past developments and in the light of the current update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, this review introduces the “Burn SOFA score” and the “3 H’s of burn sepsis” as a screening tool for early sepsis recognition in burn patients. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8779285/ /pubmed/35056334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010026 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Boehm, Dorothee
Menke, Henrik
Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title_full Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title_fullStr Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title_short Sepsis in Burns—Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock
title_sort sepsis in burns—lessons learnt from developments in the management of septic shock
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010026
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmdorothee sepsisinburnslessonslearntfromdevelopmentsinthemanagementofsepticshock
AT menkehenrik sepsisinburnslessonslearntfromdevelopmentsinthemanagementofsepticshock