Cargando…
Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes
The electrochemical performance of platinum electrodes was assessed in vitro and in vivo to determine the impact of electrode implantation and the relevance of in vitro testing in predicting in vivo behaviour. A significant change in electrochemical response was seen after electrode polarisation. As...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010103 |
_version_ | 1784637608305885184 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Alexander R. Newbold, Carrie Stathopoulos, Dimitra Carter, Paul Cowan, Robert Wallace, Gordon G. |
author_facet | Harris, Alexander R. Newbold, Carrie Stathopoulos, Dimitra Carter, Paul Cowan, Robert Wallace, Gordon G. |
author_sort | Harris, Alexander R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The electrochemical performance of platinum electrodes was assessed in vitro and in vivo to determine the impact of electrode implantation and the relevance of in vitro testing in predicting in vivo behaviour. A significant change in electrochemical response was seen after electrode polarisation. As a result, initial in vitro measurements were poor predictors of subsequent measurements performed in vitro or in vivo. Charge storage capacity and charge density measurements from initial voltammetric measurements were not correlated with subsequent measurements. Electrode implantation also affected the electrochemical impedance. The typically reported impedance at 1 kHz was a very poor predictor of electrode performance. Lower frequencies were significantly more dependent on electrode properties, while higher frequencies were dependent on solution properties. Stronger correlations in impedance at low frequencies were seen between in vitro and in vivo measurements after electrode activation had occurred. Implanting the electrode increased the resistance of the electrochemical circuit, with bone having a higher resistivity than soft tissue. In contrast, protein fouling and fibrous tissue formation had a minimal impact on electrochemical response. In vivo electrochemical measurements also typically use a quasi-reference electrode, may operate in a 2-electrode system, and suffer from uncompensated resistance. The impact of these experimental conditions on electrochemical performance and the relevance of in vitro electrode assessment is discussed. Recommended in vitro testing protocols for assessing bionic electrodes are presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8779563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87795632022-01-22 Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes Harris, Alexander R. Newbold, Carrie Stathopoulos, Dimitra Carter, Paul Cowan, Robert Wallace, Gordon G. Micromachines (Basel) Article The electrochemical performance of platinum electrodes was assessed in vitro and in vivo to determine the impact of electrode implantation and the relevance of in vitro testing in predicting in vivo behaviour. A significant change in electrochemical response was seen after electrode polarisation. As a result, initial in vitro measurements were poor predictors of subsequent measurements performed in vitro or in vivo. Charge storage capacity and charge density measurements from initial voltammetric measurements were not correlated with subsequent measurements. Electrode implantation also affected the electrochemical impedance. The typically reported impedance at 1 kHz was a very poor predictor of electrode performance. Lower frequencies were significantly more dependent on electrode properties, while higher frequencies were dependent on solution properties. Stronger correlations in impedance at low frequencies were seen between in vitro and in vivo measurements after electrode activation had occurred. Implanting the electrode increased the resistance of the electrochemical circuit, with bone having a higher resistivity than soft tissue. In contrast, protein fouling and fibrous tissue formation had a minimal impact on electrochemical response. In vivo electrochemical measurements also typically use a quasi-reference electrode, may operate in a 2-electrode system, and suffer from uncompensated resistance. The impact of these experimental conditions on electrochemical performance and the relevance of in vitro electrode assessment is discussed. Recommended in vitro testing protocols for assessing bionic electrodes are presented. MDPI 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8779563/ /pubmed/35056268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010103 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Harris, Alexander R. Newbold, Carrie Stathopoulos, Dimitra Carter, Paul Cowan, Robert Wallace, Gordon G. Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title | Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title_full | Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title_short | Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes |
title_sort | comparison of the in vitro and in vivo electrochemical performance of bionic electrodes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisalexanderr comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes AT newboldcarrie comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes AT stathopoulosdimitra comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes AT carterpaul comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes AT cowanrobert comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes AT wallacegordong comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivoelectrochemicalperformanceofbionicelectrodes |