Cargando…
Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051 |
_version_ | 1784637645061619712 |
---|---|
author | Tanwani, Anika Safdar, Nida Ali, Amir Karimaghaei, Cina Schmitz-Brown, Mary Rehmani, Ahmad Gupta, Praveena K. |
author_facet | Tanwani, Anika Safdar, Nida Ali, Amir Karimaghaei, Cina Schmitz-Brown, Mary Rehmani, Ahmad Gupta, Praveena K. |
author_sort | Tanwani, Anika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) in 170 eyes treated by 4 retina specialists practicing a pro re nata (PRN) strategy between 2010 and 2020. DME patients received an average of 7.25 injections every 6.24 weeks over 56.6 weeks. There were significant differences between retina specialists in mean number of injections (p = 0.0001) and mean length of treatment (p = 0.0007) but not in mean interval between injections. Over the treatment period, average change in BCVA was −0.053 logMAR, and average change in CMT was −51.1 µm, neither of which had significant differences between retina specialists. BCVA and CMT at initial visit were found to be significantly associated with improved BCVA and CMT over the treatment period (p < 0.001). Number of injections administered and interval between injections were not found to be significant factors affecting change in BCVA or CMT. Despite significant differences in injection dosing regimen, retina specialists achieved similar outcomes in change in BCVA and CMT over the treatment period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8779713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87797132022-01-22 Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Tanwani, Anika Safdar, Nida Ali, Amir Karimaghaei, Cina Schmitz-Brown, Mary Rehmani, Ahmad Gupta, Praveena K. Life (Basel) Article Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) in 170 eyes treated by 4 retina specialists practicing a pro re nata (PRN) strategy between 2010 and 2020. DME patients received an average of 7.25 injections every 6.24 weeks over 56.6 weeks. There were significant differences between retina specialists in mean number of injections (p = 0.0001) and mean length of treatment (p = 0.0007) but not in mean interval between injections. Over the treatment period, average change in BCVA was −0.053 logMAR, and average change in CMT was −51.1 µm, neither of which had significant differences between retina specialists. BCVA and CMT at initial visit were found to be significantly associated with improved BCVA and CMT over the treatment period (p < 0.001). Number of injections administered and interval between injections were not found to be significant factors affecting change in BCVA or CMT. Despite significant differences in injection dosing regimen, retina specialists achieved similar outcomes in change in BCVA and CMT over the treatment period. MDPI 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8779713/ /pubmed/35054444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tanwani, Anika Safdar, Nida Ali, Amir Karimaghaei, Cina Schmitz-Brown, Mary Rehmani, Ahmad Gupta, Praveena K. Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title | Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full | Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_fullStr | Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_short | Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_sort | impact of injection protocol selection by retina specialists on clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanwanianika impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT safdarnida impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT aliamir impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT karimaghaeicina impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT schmitzbrownmary impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT rehmaniahmad impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema AT guptapraveenak impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema |