Cargando…

Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanwani, Anika, Safdar, Nida, Ali, Amir, Karimaghaei, Cina, Schmitz-Brown, Mary, Rehmani, Ahmad, Gupta, Praveena K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051
_version_ 1784637645061619712
author Tanwani, Anika
Safdar, Nida
Ali, Amir
Karimaghaei, Cina
Schmitz-Brown, Mary
Rehmani, Ahmad
Gupta, Praveena K.
author_facet Tanwani, Anika
Safdar, Nida
Ali, Amir
Karimaghaei, Cina
Schmitz-Brown, Mary
Rehmani, Ahmad
Gupta, Praveena K.
author_sort Tanwani, Anika
collection PubMed
description Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) in 170 eyes treated by 4 retina specialists practicing a pro re nata (PRN) strategy between 2010 and 2020. DME patients received an average of 7.25 injections every 6.24 weeks over 56.6 weeks. There were significant differences between retina specialists in mean number of injections (p = 0.0001) and mean length of treatment (p = 0.0007) but not in mean interval between injections. Over the treatment period, average change in BCVA was −0.053 logMAR, and average change in CMT was −51.1 µm, neither of which had significant differences between retina specialists. BCVA and CMT at initial visit were found to be significantly associated with improved BCVA and CMT over the treatment period (p < 0.001). Number of injections administered and interval between injections were not found to be significant factors affecting change in BCVA or CMT. Despite significant differences in injection dosing regimen, retina specialists achieved similar outcomes in change in BCVA and CMT over the treatment period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8779713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87797132022-01-22 Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Tanwani, Anika Safdar, Nida Ali, Amir Karimaghaei, Cina Schmitz-Brown, Mary Rehmani, Ahmad Gupta, Praveena K. Life (Basel) Article Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) in 170 eyes treated by 4 retina specialists practicing a pro re nata (PRN) strategy between 2010 and 2020. DME patients received an average of 7.25 injections every 6.24 weeks over 56.6 weeks. There were significant differences between retina specialists in mean number of injections (p = 0.0001) and mean length of treatment (p = 0.0007) but not in mean interval between injections. Over the treatment period, average change in BCVA was −0.053 logMAR, and average change in CMT was −51.1 µm, neither of which had significant differences between retina specialists. BCVA and CMT at initial visit were found to be significantly associated with improved BCVA and CMT over the treatment period (p < 0.001). Number of injections administered and interval between injections were not found to be significant factors affecting change in BCVA or CMT. Despite significant differences in injection dosing regimen, retina specialists achieved similar outcomes in change in BCVA and CMT over the treatment period. MDPI 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8779713/ /pubmed/35054444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tanwani, Anika
Safdar, Nida
Ali, Amir
Karimaghaei, Cina
Schmitz-Brown, Mary
Rehmani, Ahmad
Gupta, Praveena K.
Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_fullStr Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_short Impact of Injection Protocol Selection by Retina Specialists on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_sort impact of injection protocol selection by retina specialists on clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12010051
work_keys_str_mv AT tanwanianika impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT safdarnida impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT aliamir impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT karimaghaeicina impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT schmitzbrownmary impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT rehmaniahmad impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT guptapraveenak impactofinjectionprotocolselectionbyretinaspecialistsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeticmacularedema