Cargando…

Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process

The required minimum number of psychiatric inpatient beds is highly debated and has substantial resource implications. The present study used the Delphi method to try to reach a global consensus on the minimum and optimal psychiatric bed numbers. An international board of scientific advisors nominat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mundt, Adrian P., Rozas Serri, Enzo, Irarrázaval, Matías, O’Reilly, Richard, Allison, Stephen, Bastiampillai, Tarun, Musisi, Seggane, Kagee, Ashraf, Golenkov, Andrei, El-Khoury, Joseph, Park, Seon-Cheol, Chwastiak, Lydia, Priebe, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01435-0
_version_ 1784637732314677248
author Mundt, Adrian P.
Rozas Serri, Enzo
Irarrázaval, Matías
O’Reilly, Richard
Allison, Stephen
Bastiampillai, Tarun
Musisi, Seggane
Kagee, Ashraf
Golenkov, Andrei
El-Khoury, Joseph
Park, Seon-Cheol
Chwastiak, Lydia
Priebe, Stefan
author_facet Mundt, Adrian P.
Rozas Serri, Enzo
Irarrázaval, Matías
O’Reilly, Richard
Allison, Stephen
Bastiampillai, Tarun
Musisi, Seggane
Kagee, Ashraf
Golenkov, Andrei
El-Khoury, Joseph
Park, Seon-Cheol
Chwastiak, Lydia
Priebe, Stefan
author_sort Mundt, Adrian P.
collection PubMed
description The required minimum number of psychiatric inpatient beds is highly debated and has substantial resource implications. The present study used the Delphi method to try to reach a global consensus on the minimum and optimal psychiatric bed numbers. An international board of scientific advisors nominated the Delphi panel members. In the first round, the expert panel provided responses exploring estimate ranges for a minimum to optimal numbers of psychiatric beds and three levels of shortage. In a second round, the panel reconsidered their responses using the input from the total group to achieve consensus. The Delphi panel comprised 65 experts (42% women, 54% based in low- and middle-income countries) from 40 countries in the six regions of the World Health Organization. Sixty psychiatric beds per 100 000 population were considered optimal and 30 the minimum, whilst 25–30 was regarded as mild, 15–25 as moderate, and less than 15 as severe shortage. This is the first expert consensus on minimum and optimal bed numbers involving experts from HICs and LMICs. Many high-income countries have psychiatric bed numbers that fall within the recommended range. In contrast, the number of beds in many LMIC is below the minimum recommended rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87800432022-01-24 Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process Mundt, Adrian P. Rozas Serri, Enzo Irarrázaval, Matías O’Reilly, Richard Allison, Stephen Bastiampillai, Tarun Musisi, Seggane Kagee, Ashraf Golenkov, Andrei El-Khoury, Joseph Park, Seon-Cheol Chwastiak, Lydia Priebe, Stefan Mol Psychiatry Perspective The required minimum number of psychiatric inpatient beds is highly debated and has substantial resource implications. The present study used the Delphi method to try to reach a global consensus on the minimum and optimal psychiatric bed numbers. An international board of scientific advisors nominated the Delphi panel members. In the first round, the expert panel provided responses exploring estimate ranges for a minimum to optimal numbers of psychiatric beds and three levels of shortage. In a second round, the panel reconsidered their responses using the input from the total group to achieve consensus. The Delphi panel comprised 65 experts (42% women, 54% based in low- and middle-income countries) from 40 countries in the six regions of the World Health Organization. Sixty psychiatric beds per 100 000 population were considered optimal and 30 the minimum, whilst 25–30 was regarded as mild, 15–25 as moderate, and less than 15 as severe shortage. This is the first expert consensus on minimum and optimal bed numbers involving experts from HICs and LMICs. Many high-income countries have psychiatric bed numbers that fall within the recommended range. In contrast, the number of beds in many LMIC is below the minimum recommended rate. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8780043/ /pubmed/35064234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01435-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Perspective
Mundt, Adrian P.
Rozas Serri, Enzo
Irarrázaval, Matías
O’Reilly, Richard
Allison, Stephen
Bastiampillai, Tarun
Musisi, Seggane
Kagee, Ashraf
Golenkov, Andrei
El-Khoury, Joseph
Park, Seon-Cheol
Chwastiak, Lydia
Priebe, Stefan
Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title_full Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title_fullStr Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title_full_unstemmed Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title_short Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process
title_sort minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a delphi process
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01435-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mundtadrianp minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT rozasserrienzo minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT irarrazavalmatias minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT oreillyrichard minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT allisonstephen minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT bastiampillaitarun minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT musisiseggane minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT kageeashraf minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT golenkovandrei minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT elkhouryjoseph minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT parkseoncheol minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT chwastiaklydia minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess
AT priebestefan minimumandoptimalnumbersofpsychiatricbedsexpertconsensususingadelphiprocess