Cargando…

Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)

While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigoard, Philippe, Roulaud, Manuel, Goudman, Lisa, Adjali, Nihel, Ounajim, Amine, Voirin, Jimmy, Perruchoud, Christophe, Bouche, Bénédicte, Page, Philippe, Guillevin, Rémy, Naudin, Mathieu, Simoneau, Martin, Lorgeoux, Bertille, Baron, Sandrine, Nivole, Kevin, Many, Mathilde, Maitre, Iona, Rigoard, Raphaël, David, Romain, Moens, Maarten, Billot, Maxime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010007
_version_ 1784637756189704192
author Rigoard, Philippe
Roulaud, Manuel
Goudman, Lisa
Adjali, Nihel
Ounajim, Amine
Voirin, Jimmy
Perruchoud, Christophe
Bouche, Bénédicte
Page, Philippe
Guillevin, Rémy
Naudin, Mathieu
Simoneau, Martin
Lorgeoux, Bertille
Baron, Sandrine
Nivole, Kevin
Many, Mathilde
Maitre, Iona
Rigoard, Raphaël
David, Romain
Moens, Maarten
Billot, Maxime
author_facet Rigoard, Philippe
Roulaud, Manuel
Goudman, Lisa
Adjali, Nihel
Ounajim, Amine
Voirin, Jimmy
Perruchoud, Christophe
Bouche, Bénédicte
Page, Philippe
Guillevin, Rémy
Naudin, Mathieu
Simoneau, Martin
Lorgeoux, Bertille
Baron, Sandrine
Nivole, Kevin
Many, Mathilde
Maitre, Iona
Rigoard, Raphaël
David, Romain
Moens, Maarten
Billot, Maxime
author_sort Rigoard, Philippe
collection PubMed
description While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new waveforms, such as burst stimulation and different spatial neural targets, such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), have shown promising results. Comparisons between DRGS and standard SCS, or their combination, have never been studied on the same patients. “BOOST DRG” is the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to compare SCS vs. DRGS vs. SCS+DRGS. Sixty-six PSPS-T2 patients will be recruited internationally in three centers. Before crossing over, patients will receive each stimulation modality for 1 month, using tonic conventional stimulation. After 3 months, stimulation will consist in switching to burst for 1 month, and patients will choose which modality/waveform they receive and will then be reassessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition to our primary outcome based on pain rating, this study is designed to assess quality of life, functional disability, psychological distress, pain surface coverage, global impression of change, medication quantification, adverse events, brain functional imaging and electroencephalography, with the objective being to provide a multidimensional insight based on composite pain assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87801292022-01-22 Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study) Rigoard, Philippe Roulaud, Manuel Goudman, Lisa Adjali, Nihel Ounajim, Amine Voirin, Jimmy Perruchoud, Christophe Bouche, Bénédicte Page, Philippe Guillevin, Rémy Naudin, Mathieu Simoneau, Martin Lorgeoux, Bertille Baron, Sandrine Nivole, Kevin Many, Mathilde Maitre, Iona Rigoard, Raphaël David, Romain Moens, Maarten Billot, Maxime Medicina (Kaunas) Study Protocol While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new waveforms, such as burst stimulation and different spatial neural targets, such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), have shown promising results. Comparisons between DRGS and standard SCS, or their combination, have never been studied on the same patients. “BOOST DRG” is the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to compare SCS vs. DRGS vs. SCS+DRGS. Sixty-six PSPS-T2 patients will be recruited internationally in three centers. Before crossing over, patients will receive each stimulation modality for 1 month, using tonic conventional stimulation. After 3 months, stimulation will consist in switching to burst for 1 month, and patients will choose which modality/waveform they receive and will then be reassessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition to our primary outcome based on pain rating, this study is designed to assess quality of life, functional disability, psychological distress, pain surface coverage, global impression of change, medication quantification, adverse events, brain functional imaging and electroencephalography, with the objective being to provide a multidimensional insight based on composite pain assessment. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8780129/ /pubmed/35056316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010007 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rigoard, Philippe
Roulaud, Manuel
Goudman, Lisa
Adjali, Nihel
Ounajim, Amine
Voirin, Jimmy
Perruchoud, Christophe
Bouche, Bénédicte
Page, Philippe
Guillevin, Rémy
Naudin, Mathieu
Simoneau, Martin
Lorgeoux, Bertille
Baron, Sandrine
Nivole, Kevin
Many, Mathilde
Maitre, Iona
Rigoard, Raphaël
David, Romain
Moens, Maarten
Billot, Maxime
Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title_full Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title_fullStr Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title_short Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)
title_sort comparison of spinal cord stimulation vs. dorsal root ganglion stimulation vs. association of both in patients with refractory chronic back and/or lower limb neuropathic pain: an international, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial (boost-drg study)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010007
work_keys_str_mv AT rigoardphilippe comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT roulaudmanuel comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT goudmanlisa comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT adjalinihel comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT ounajimamine comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT voirinjimmy comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT perruchoudchristophe comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT bouchebenedicte comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT pagephilippe comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT guillevinremy comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT naudinmathieu comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT simoneaumartin comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT lorgeouxbertille comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT baronsandrine comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT nivolekevin comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT manymathilde comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT maitreiona comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT rigoardraphael comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT davidromain comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT moensmaarten comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy
AT billotmaxime comparisonofspinalcordstimulationvsdorsalrootganglionstimulationvsassociationofbothinpatientswithrefractorychronicbackandorlowerlimbneuropathicpainaninternationalprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcrossovertrialboostdrgstudy