Cargando…
Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical tri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995 |
_version_ | 1784637805316538368 |
---|---|
author | Stephenson, Kirk A. J. Zhu, Julia Dockery, Adrian Whelan, Laura Burke, Tomás Turner, Jacqueline O’Byrne, James J. Farrar, G. Jane Keegan, David J. |
author_facet | Stephenson, Kirk A. J. Zhu, Julia Dockery, Adrian Whelan, Laura Burke, Tomás Turner, Jacqueline O’Byrne, James J. Farrar, G. Jane Keegan, David J. |
author_sort | Stephenson, Kirk A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical trials and approved treatments. First-tier genetic testing of IRDs with panel-based next-generation sequencing (pNGS) has a diagnostic yield of ≈70–80%, leaving the remaining more challenging cases to be resolved by second-tier testing methods. This study describes the phenotypic reassessment of patients with a negative result from first-tier pNGS and the rationale, outcomes, and cost of second-tier genetic testing approaches. Removing non-IRD cases from consideration and utilizing case-appropriate second-tier genetic testing techniques, we genetically resolved 56% of previously unresolved pedigrees, bringing the overall resolve rate to 92% (388/423). At present, pNGS remains the most cost-effective first-tier approach for the molecular assessment of diverse IRD populations Second-tier genetic testing should be guided by clinical (i.e., reassessment, multimodal imaging, electrophysiology), and genetic (i.e., single alleles in autosomal recessive disease) indications to achieve a genetic diagnosis in the most cost-effective manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8780304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87803042022-01-22 Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing Stephenson, Kirk A. J. Zhu, Julia Dockery, Adrian Whelan, Laura Burke, Tomás Turner, Jacqueline O’Byrne, James J. Farrar, G. Jane Keegan, David J. Int J Mol Sci Article Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical trials and approved treatments. First-tier genetic testing of IRDs with panel-based next-generation sequencing (pNGS) has a diagnostic yield of ≈70–80%, leaving the remaining more challenging cases to be resolved by second-tier testing methods. This study describes the phenotypic reassessment of patients with a negative result from first-tier pNGS and the rationale, outcomes, and cost of second-tier genetic testing approaches. Removing non-IRD cases from consideration and utilizing case-appropriate second-tier genetic testing techniques, we genetically resolved 56% of previously unresolved pedigrees, bringing the overall resolve rate to 92% (388/423). At present, pNGS remains the most cost-effective first-tier approach for the molecular assessment of diverse IRD populations Second-tier genetic testing should be guided by clinical (i.e., reassessment, multimodal imaging, electrophysiology), and genetic (i.e., single alleles in autosomal recessive disease) indications to achieve a genetic diagnosis in the most cost-effective manner. MDPI 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8780304/ /pubmed/35055178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stephenson, Kirk A. J. Zhu, Julia Dockery, Adrian Whelan, Laura Burke, Tomás Turner, Jacqueline O’Byrne, James J. Farrar, G. Jane Keegan, David J. Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title | Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title_full | Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title_fullStr | Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title_short | Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing |
title_sort | clinical and genetic re-evaluation of inherited retinal degeneration pedigrees following initial negative findings on panel-based next generation sequencing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephensonkirkaj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT zhujulia clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT dockeryadrian clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT whelanlaura clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT burketomas clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT turnerjacqueline clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT obyrnejamesj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT farrargjane clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing AT keegandavidj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing |