Cargando…

Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing

Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephenson, Kirk A. J., Zhu, Julia, Dockery, Adrian, Whelan, Laura, Burke, Tomás, Turner, Jacqueline, O’Byrne, James J., Farrar, G. Jane, Keegan, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995
_version_ 1784637805316538368
author Stephenson, Kirk A. J.
Zhu, Julia
Dockery, Adrian
Whelan, Laura
Burke, Tomás
Turner, Jacqueline
O’Byrne, James J.
Farrar, G. Jane
Keegan, David J.
author_facet Stephenson, Kirk A. J.
Zhu, Julia
Dockery, Adrian
Whelan, Laura
Burke, Tomás
Turner, Jacqueline
O’Byrne, James J.
Farrar, G. Jane
Keegan, David J.
author_sort Stephenson, Kirk A. J.
collection PubMed
description Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical trials and approved treatments. First-tier genetic testing of IRDs with panel-based next-generation sequencing (pNGS) has a diagnostic yield of ≈70–80%, leaving the remaining more challenging cases to be resolved by second-tier testing methods. This study describes the phenotypic reassessment of patients with a negative result from first-tier pNGS and the rationale, outcomes, and cost of second-tier genetic testing approaches. Removing non-IRD cases from consideration and utilizing case-appropriate second-tier genetic testing techniques, we genetically resolved 56% of previously unresolved pedigrees, bringing the overall resolve rate to 92% (388/423). At present, pNGS remains the most cost-effective first-tier approach for the molecular assessment of diverse IRD populations Second-tier genetic testing should be guided by clinical (i.e., reassessment, multimodal imaging, electrophysiology), and genetic (i.e., single alleles in autosomal recessive disease) indications to achieve a genetic diagnosis in the most cost-effective manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87803042022-01-22 Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing Stephenson, Kirk A. J. Zhu, Julia Dockery, Adrian Whelan, Laura Burke, Tomás Turner, Jacqueline O’Byrne, James J. Farrar, G. Jane Keegan, David J. Int J Mol Sci Article Although rare, inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the most common reason for blind registration in the working age population. They are highly genetically heterogeneous (>300 known genetic loci), and confirmation of a molecular diagnosis is a prerequisite for many therapeutic clinical trials and approved treatments. First-tier genetic testing of IRDs with panel-based next-generation sequencing (pNGS) has a diagnostic yield of ≈70–80%, leaving the remaining more challenging cases to be resolved by second-tier testing methods. This study describes the phenotypic reassessment of patients with a negative result from first-tier pNGS and the rationale, outcomes, and cost of second-tier genetic testing approaches. Removing non-IRD cases from consideration and utilizing case-appropriate second-tier genetic testing techniques, we genetically resolved 56% of previously unresolved pedigrees, bringing the overall resolve rate to 92% (388/423). At present, pNGS remains the most cost-effective first-tier approach for the molecular assessment of diverse IRD populations Second-tier genetic testing should be guided by clinical (i.e., reassessment, multimodal imaging, electrophysiology), and genetic (i.e., single alleles in autosomal recessive disease) indications to achieve a genetic diagnosis in the most cost-effective manner. MDPI 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8780304/ /pubmed/35055178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stephenson, Kirk A. J.
Zhu, Julia
Dockery, Adrian
Whelan, Laura
Burke, Tomás
Turner, Jacqueline
O’Byrne, James J.
Farrar, G. Jane
Keegan, David J.
Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title_full Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title_fullStr Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title_short Clinical and Genetic Re-Evaluation of Inherited Retinal Degeneration Pedigrees following Initial Negative Findings on Panel-Based Next Generation Sequencing
title_sort clinical and genetic re-evaluation of inherited retinal degeneration pedigrees following initial negative findings on panel-based next generation sequencing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020995
work_keys_str_mv AT stephensonkirkaj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT zhujulia clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT dockeryadrian clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT whelanlaura clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT burketomas clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT turnerjacqueline clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT obyrnejamesj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT farrargjane clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT keegandavidj clinicalandgeneticreevaluationofinheritedretinaldegenerationpedigreesfollowinginitialnegativefindingsonpanelbasednextgenerationsequencing