Cargando…
The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161 |
_version_ | 1784637855140675584 |
---|---|
author | Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja Stele, Marija Chersicola, Marko Pompe-Novak, Maruša Sivilotti, Paolo |
author_facet | Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja Stele, Marija Chersicola, Marko Pompe-Novak, Maruša Sivilotti, Paolo |
author_sort | Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogens with increased chances of virulent strain development has expanded. Therefore, we studied the impact of the combination of abiotic (drought) and biotic (Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) infection) stress on physiological and molecular responses on the grapevine of cv. Schioppettino by studying the influence of drought and GFLV infection on plant water status of grapevines, on grapevine xylem vessel occlusion, and on expression patterns of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1 (NCED1), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 2 (NCED2), WRKY encoding transcription factor (WRKY54) and RD22-like protein (RD22) genes in grapevines. A complex response of grapevine to the combination of drought and GFLV infection was shown, including priming in the case of grapevine water status, net effect in the case of area of occluded vessels in xylem, and different types of interaction of both stresses in the case of expression of four abscisic acid-related genes. Our results showed that mild (but not severe) water stress can be better sustained by GFLV infection rather than by healthy vines. GFLV proved to improve the resilience of the plants to water stress, which is an important outcome to cope with the challenges of global warming. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8780503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87805032022-01-22 The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja Stele, Marija Chersicola, Marko Pompe-Novak, Maruša Sivilotti, Paolo Plants (Basel) Article In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogens with increased chances of virulent strain development has expanded. Therefore, we studied the impact of the combination of abiotic (drought) and biotic (Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) infection) stress on physiological and molecular responses on the grapevine of cv. Schioppettino by studying the influence of drought and GFLV infection on plant water status of grapevines, on grapevine xylem vessel occlusion, and on expression patterns of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1 (NCED1), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 2 (NCED2), WRKY encoding transcription factor (WRKY54) and RD22-like protein (RD22) genes in grapevines. A complex response of grapevine to the combination of drought and GFLV infection was shown, including priming in the case of grapevine water status, net effect in the case of area of occluded vessels in xylem, and different types of interaction of both stresses in the case of expression of four abscisic acid-related genes. Our results showed that mild (but not severe) water stress can be better sustained by GFLV infection rather than by healthy vines. GFLV proved to improve the resilience of the plants to water stress, which is an important outcome to cope with the challenges of global warming. MDPI 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8780503/ /pubmed/35050050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja Stele, Marija Chersicola, Marko Pompe-Novak, Maruša Sivilotti, Paolo The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title | The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title_full | The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title_fullStr | The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title_full_unstemmed | The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title_short | The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations |
title_sort | physiological impact of gflv virus infection on grapevine water status: first observations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jezkrebeljanastazija thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT rupnikcigojmaja thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT stelemarija thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT chersicolamarko thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT pompenovakmarusa thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT sivilottipaolo thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT jezkrebeljanastazija physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT rupnikcigojmaja physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT stelemarija physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT chersicolamarko physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT pompenovakmarusa physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations AT sivilottipaolo physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations |