Cargando…

The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations

In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija, Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja, Stele, Marija, Chersicola, Marko, Pompe-Novak, Maruša, Sivilotti, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161
_version_ 1784637855140675584
author Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija
Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja
Stele, Marija
Chersicola, Marko
Pompe-Novak, Maruša
Sivilotti, Paolo
author_facet Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija
Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja
Stele, Marija
Chersicola, Marko
Pompe-Novak, Maruša
Sivilotti, Paolo
author_sort Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija
collection PubMed
description In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogens with increased chances of virulent strain development has expanded. Therefore, we studied the impact of the combination of abiotic (drought) and biotic (Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) infection) stress on physiological and molecular responses on the grapevine of cv. Schioppettino by studying the influence of drought and GFLV infection on plant water status of grapevines, on grapevine xylem vessel occlusion, and on expression patterns of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1 (NCED1), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 2 (NCED2), WRKY encoding transcription factor (WRKY54) and RD22-like protein (RD22) genes in grapevines. A complex response of grapevine to the combination of drought and GFLV infection was shown, including priming in the case of grapevine water status, net effect in the case of area of occluded vessels in xylem, and different types of interaction of both stresses in the case of expression of four abscisic acid-related genes. Our results showed that mild (but not severe) water stress can be better sustained by GFLV infection rather than by healthy vines. GFLV proved to improve the resilience of the plants to water stress, which is an important outcome to cope with the challenges of global warming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87805032022-01-22 The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja Stele, Marija Chersicola, Marko Pompe-Novak, Maruša Sivilotti, Paolo Plants (Basel) Article In a vineyard, grapevines are simultaneously exposed to combinations of several abiotic (drought, extreme temperatures, salinity) and biotic stresses (phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria). With climate change, the incidences of drought in vine growing regions are increased and the host range of pathogens with increased chances of virulent strain development has expanded. Therefore, we studied the impact of the combination of abiotic (drought) and biotic (Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) infection) stress on physiological and molecular responses on the grapevine of cv. Schioppettino by studying the influence of drought and GFLV infection on plant water status of grapevines, on grapevine xylem vessel occlusion, and on expression patterns of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1 (NCED1), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 2 (NCED2), WRKY encoding transcription factor (WRKY54) and RD22-like protein (RD22) genes in grapevines. A complex response of grapevine to the combination of drought and GFLV infection was shown, including priming in the case of grapevine water status, net effect in the case of area of occluded vessels in xylem, and different types of interaction of both stresses in the case of expression of four abscisic acid-related genes. Our results showed that mild (but not severe) water stress can be better sustained by GFLV infection rather than by healthy vines. GFLV proved to improve the resilience of the plants to water stress, which is an important outcome to cope with the challenges of global warming. MDPI 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8780503/ /pubmed/35050050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jež-Krebelj, Anastazija
Rupnik-Cigoj, Maja
Stele, Marija
Chersicola, Marko
Pompe-Novak, Maruša
Sivilotti, Paolo
The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title_full The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title_fullStr The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title_full_unstemmed The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title_short The Physiological Impact of GFLV Virus Infection on Grapevine Water Status: First Observations
title_sort physiological impact of gflv virus infection on grapevine water status: first observations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11020161
work_keys_str_mv AT jezkrebeljanastazija thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT rupnikcigojmaja thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT stelemarija thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT chersicolamarko thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT pompenovakmarusa thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT sivilottipaolo thephysiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT jezkrebeljanastazija physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT rupnikcigojmaja physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT stelemarija physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT chersicolamarko physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT pompenovakmarusa physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations
AT sivilottipaolo physiologicalimpactofgflvvirusinfectionongrapevinewaterstatusfirstobservations