Cargando…

Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters

Drop on demand (DoD) inkjet printing is a high precision, non-contact, and maskless additive manufacturing technique employed in producing high-precision micrometer-scaled geometries allowing free design manufacturing for flexible devices and printed electronics. A lot of studies exist regarding the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertolucci, Federico, Berdozzi, Nicolò, Rebaioli, Lara, Patil, Trunal, Vertechy, Rocco, Fassi, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010057
_version_ 1784637868341198848
author Bertolucci, Federico
Berdozzi, Nicolò
Rebaioli, Lara
Patil, Trunal
Vertechy, Rocco
Fassi, Irene
author_facet Bertolucci, Federico
Berdozzi, Nicolò
Rebaioli, Lara
Patil, Trunal
Vertechy, Rocco
Fassi, Irene
author_sort Bertolucci, Federico
collection PubMed
description Drop on demand (DoD) inkjet printing is a high precision, non-contact, and maskless additive manufacturing technique employed in producing high-precision micrometer-scaled geometries allowing free design manufacturing for flexible devices and printed electronics. A lot of studies exist regarding the ink droplet delivery from the nozzle to the substrate and the jet fluid dynamics, but the literature lacks systematic approaches dealing with the relationship between process parameters and geometrical outcome. This study investigates the influence of the main printing parameters (namely, the spacing between subsequent drops deposited on the substrate, the printing speed, and the nozzle temperature) on the accuracy of a representative geometry consisting of two interdigitated comb-shape electrodes. The study objective was achieved thanks to a proper experimental campaign developed according to Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology. The printing process performance was evaluated by suitable geometrical quantities extracted from the acquired images of the printed samples using a MATLAB algorithm. A drop spacing of 140 µm and 170 µm on the two main directions of the printing plane, with a nozzle temperature of 35 °C, resulted as the most appropriate parameter combination for printing the target geometry. No significant influence of the printing speed on the process outcomes was found, thus choosing the highest speed value within the investigated range can increase productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87805582022-01-22 Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters Bertolucci, Federico Berdozzi, Nicolò Rebaioli, Lara Patil, Trunal Vertechy, Rocco Fassi, Irene Micromachines (Basel) Article Drop on demand (DoD) inkjet printing is a high precision, non-contact, and maskless additive manufacturing technique employed in producing high-precision micrometer-scaled geometries allowing free design manufacturing for flexible devices and printed electronics. A lot of studies exist regarding the ink droplet delivery from the nozzle to the substrate and the jet fluid dynamics, but the literature lacks systematic approaches dealing with the relationship between process parameters and geometrical outcome. This study investigates the influence of the main printing parameters (namely, the spacing between subsequent drops deposited on the substrate, the printing speed, and the nozzle temperature) on the accuracy of a representative geometry consisting of two interdigitated comb-shape electrodes. The study objective was achieved thanks to a proper experimental campaign developed according to Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology. The printing process performance was evaluated by suitable geometrical quantities extracted from the acquired images of the printed samples using a MATLAB algorithm. A drop spacing of 140 µm and 170 µm on the two main directions of the printing plane, with a nozzle temperature of 35 °C, resulted as the most appropriate parameter combination for printing the target geometry. No significant influence of the printing speed on the process outcomes was found, thus choosing the highest speed value within the investigated range can increase productivity. MDPI 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8780558/ /pubmed/35056222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010057 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bertolucci, Federico
Berdozzi, Nicolò
Rebaioli, Lara
Patil, Trunal
Vertechy, Rocco
Fassi, Irene
Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title_full Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title_fullStr Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title_short Assessing the Relationships between Interdigital Geometry Quality and Inkjet Printing Parameters
title_sort assessing the relationships between interdigital geometry quality and inkjet printing parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35056222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13010057
work_keys_str_mv AT bertoluccifederico assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters
AT berdozzinicolo assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters
AT rebaiolilara assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters
AT patiltrunal assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters
AT vertechyrocco assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters
AT fassiirene assessingtherelationshipsbetweeninterdigitalgeometryqualityandinkjetprintingparameters