Cargando…
Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systema...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037 |
_version_ | 1784637890089713664 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jie Wang, Zhuo Liu, Ning Liu, Caiyan Mao, Chenhui Dong, Liling Li, Jie Huang, Xinying Lei, Dan Chu, Shanshan Wang, Jianyong Gao, Jing |
author_facet | Wang, Jie Wang, Zhuo Liu, Ning Liu, Caiyan Mao, Chenhui Dong, Liling Li, Jie Huang, Xinying Lei, Dan Chu, Shanshan Wang, Jianyong Gao, Jing |
author_sort | Wang, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systematic neuropsychological test battery (NTB) by machine learning and develop new classification models for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among individuals with MMSE ≥ 26. Methods: 375 participants with MMSE ≥ 26 were assigned a diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n = 67), MCI (n = 174), or dementia (n = 134). We compared the performance of five machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, SVM, XGBoost, and random forest (RF), in identifying MCI and dementia. Results: RF performed best in identifying MCI and dementia. Six neuropsychological subtests with high-importance features were selected to form a simplified NTB, and the test time was cut in half. The AUC of the RF model was 0.89 for distinguishing MCI from CU, and 0.84 for distinguishing dementia from nondementia. Conclusions: This simplified cognitive assessment model can be useful for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia in patients with normal MMSE. It not only optimizes the content of cognitive evaluation, but also improves diagnosis and reduces missed diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8780625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87806252022-01-22 Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores Wang, Jie Wang, Zhuo Liu, Ning Liu, Caiyan Mao, Chenhui Dong, Liling Li, Jie Huang, Xinying Lei, Dan Chu, Shanshan Wang, Jianyong Gao, Jing J Pers Med Article Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systematic neuropsychological test battery (NTB) by machine learning and develop new classification models for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among individuals with MMSE ≥ 26. Methods: 375 participants with MMSE ≥ 26 were assigned a diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n = 67), MCI (n = 174), or dementia (n = 134). We compared the performance of five machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, SVM, XGBoost, and random forest (RF), in identifying MCI and dementia. Results: RF performed best in identifying MCI and dementia. Six neuropsychological subtests with high-importance features were selected to form a simplified NTB, and the test time was cut in half. The AUC of the RF model was 0.89 for distinguishing MCI from CU, and 0.84 for distinguishing dementia from nondementia. Conclusions: This simplified cognitive assessment model can be useful for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia in patients with normal MMSE. It not only optimizes the content of cognitive evaluation, but also improves diagnosis and reduces missed diagnosis. MDPI 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8780625/ /pubmed/35055352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Jie Wang, Zhuo Liu, Ning Liu, Caiyan Mao, Chenhui Dong, Liling Li, Jie Huang, Xinying Lei, Dan Chu, Shanshan Wang, Jianyong Gao, Jing Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title | Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title_full | Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title_fullStr | Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title_short | Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores |
title_sort | random forest model in the diagnosis of dementia patients with normal mini-mental state examination scores |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjie randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT wangzhuo randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT liuning randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT liucaiyan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT maochenhui randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT dongliling randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT lijie randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT huangxinying randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT leidan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT chushanshan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT wangjianyong randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores AT gaojing randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores |