Cargando…

Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores

Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jie, Wang, Zhuo, Liu, Ning, Liu, Caiyan, Mao, Chenhui, Dong, Liling, Li, Jie, Huang, Xinying, Lei, Dan, Chu, Shanshan, Wang, Jianyong, Gao, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037
_version_ 1784637890089713664
author Wang, Jie
Wang, Zhuo
Liu, Ning
Liu, Caiyan
Mao, Chenhui
Dong, Liling
Li, Jie
Huang, Xinying
Lei, Dan
Chu, Shanshan
Wang, Jianyong
Gao, Jing
author_facet Wang, Jie
Wang, Zhuo
Liu, Ning
Liu, Caiyan
Mao, Chenhui
Dong, Liling
Li, Jie
Huang, Xinying
Lei, Dan
Chu, Shanshan
Wang, Jianyong
Gao, Jing
author_sort Wang, Jie
collection PubMed
description Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systematic neuropsychological test battery (NTB) by machine learning and develop new classification models for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among individuals with MMSE ≥ 26. Methods: 375 participants with MMSE ≥ 26 were assigned a diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n = 67), MCI (n = 174), or dementia (n = 134). We compared the performance of five machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, SVM, XGBoost, and random forest (RF), in identifying MCI and dementia. Results: RF performed best in identifying MCI and dementia. Six neuropsychological subtests with high-importance features were selected to form a simplified NTB, and the test time was cut in half. The AUC of the RF model was 0.89 for distinguishing MCI from CU, and 0.84 for distinguishing dementia from nondementia. Conclusions: This simplified cognitive assessment model can be useful for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia in patients with normal MMSE. It not only optimizes the content of cognitive evaluation, but also improves diagnosis and reduces missed diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87806252022-01-22 Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores Wang, Jie Wang, Zhuo Liu, Ning Liu, Caiyan Mao, Chenhui Dong, Liling Li, Jie Huang, Xinying Lei, Dan Chu, Shanshan Wang, Jianyong Gao, Jing J Pers Med Article Background: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used tool in cognitive screening. Some individuals with normal MMSE scores have extensive cognitive impairment. Systematic neuropsychological assessment should be performed in these patients. This study aimed to optimize the systematic neuropsychological test battery (NTB) by machine learning and develop new classification models for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among individuals with MMSE ≥ 26. Methods: 375 participants with MMSE ≥ 26 were assigned a diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n = 67), MCI (n = 174), or dementia (n = 134). We compared the performance of five machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, SVM, XGBoost, and random forest (RF), in identifying MCI and dementia. Results: RF performed best in identifying MCI and dementia. Six neuropsychological subtests with high-importance features were selected to form a simplified NTB, and the test time was cut in half. The AUC of the RF model was 0.89 for distinguishing MCI from CU, and 0.84 for distinguishing dementia from nondementia. Conclusions: This simplified cognitive assessment model can be useful for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia in patients with normal MMSE. It not only optimizes the content of cognitive evaluation, but also improves diagnosis and reduces missed diagnosis. MDPI 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8780625/ /pubmed/35055352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Jie
Wang, Zhuo
Liu, Ning
Liu, Caiyan
Mao, Chenhui
Dong, Liling
Li, Jie
Huang, Xinying
Lei, Dan
Chu, Shanshan
Wang, Jianyong
Gao, Jing
Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title_full Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title_fullStr Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title_full_unstemmed Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title_short Random Forest Model in the Diagnosis of Dementia Patients with Normal Mini-Mental State Examination Scores
title_sort random forest model in the diagnosis of dementia patients with normal mini-mental state examination scores
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010037
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjie randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT wangzhuo randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT liuning randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT liucaiyan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT maochenhui randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT dongliling randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT lijie randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT huangxinying randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT leidan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT chushanshan randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT wangjianyong randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores
AT gaojing randomforestmodelinthediagnosisofdementiapatientswithnormalminimentalstateexaminationscores