Cargando…

Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction

In medicine, protocols are applied to assure the provision of the treatment with the greatest probability of success. However, the development of protocols is based on the determination of the best intervention for the group. If the group is heterogeneous, there will always be a subset of patients f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynn, Lawrence A., Wheeler, Emily, Woda, Russel, Levitov, Alexander B., Stawicki, Stanislaw P., Bahner, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_75_21
_version_ 1784637894225297408
author Lynn, Lawrence A.
Wheeler, Emily
Woda, Russel
Levitov, Alexander B.
Stawicki, Stanislaw P.
Bahner, David P.
author_facet Lynn, Lawrence A.
Wheeler, Emily
Woda, Russel
Levitov, Alexander B.
Stawicki, Stanislaw P.
Bahner, David P.
author_sort Lynn, Lawrence A.
collection PubMed
description In medicine, protocols are applied to assure the provision of the treatment with the greatest probability of success. However, the development of protocols is based on the determination of the best intervention for the group. If the group is heterogeneous, there will always be a subset of patients for which the protocol will fail. Furthermore, over time, heterogeneity of the group may not be stable, so the percentage of patients for which a given protocol may fail may change depending on the dynamic patient mix in the group. This was thrown into stark focus during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. When a COVID-19 patient presented meeting SIRS or the Berlin Criteria, these patients met the criteria for entry into the sepsis protocol and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) protocol, respectively and were treated accordingly. This was perceived to be the correct response because these patients met the criteria for the “group” definitions of sepsis and/or ARDS. However, the application of these protocols to patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection had never been studied. Initially, poor outcomes were blamed on protocol noncompliance or some unknown patient factor. This initial perception is not surprising as these protocols are standards and were perceived as comprising the best possible evidence-based care. While the academic response to the pandemic was robust, recognition that existing protocols were failing might have been detected sooner if protocol failure detection had been integrated with the protocols themselves. In this review, we propose that, while protocols are necessary to ensure that minimum standards of care are met, protocols need an additional feature, integrated protocol failure detection, which provides an output responsive to protocol failure in real time so other treatment options can be considered and research efforts rapidly focused.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87806412022-02-04 Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction Lynn, Lawrence A. Wheeler, Emily Woda, Russel Levitov, Alexander B. Stawicki, Stanislaw P. Bahner, David P. J Emerg Trauma Shock Review Article In medicine, protocols are applied to assure the provision of the treatment with the greatest probability of success. However, the development of protocols is based on the determination of the best intervention for the group. If the group is heterogeneous, there will always be a subset of patients for which the protocol will fail. Furthermore, over time, heterogeneity of the group may not be stable, so the percentage of patients for which a given protocol may fail may change depending on the dynamic patient mix in the group. This was thrown into stark focus during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. When a COVID-19 patient presented meeting SIRS or the Berlin Criteria, these patients met the criteria for entry into the sepsis protocol and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) protocol, respectively and were treated accordingly. This was perceived to be the correct response because these patients met the criteria for the “group” definitions of sepsis and/or ARDS. However, the application of these protocols to patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection had never been studied. Initially, poor outcomes were blamed on protocol noncompliance or some unknown patient factor. This initial perception is not surprising as these protocols are standards and were perceived as comprising the best possible evidence-based care. While the academic response to the pandemic was robust, recognition that existing protocols were failing might have been detected sooner if protocol failure detection had been integrated with the protocols themselves. In this review, we propose that, while protocols are necessary to ensure that minimum standards of care are met, protocols need an additional feature, integrated protocol failure detection, which provides an output responsive to protocol failure in real time so other treatment options can be considered and research efforts rapidly focused. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8780641/ /pubmed/35125789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_75_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lynn, Lawrence A.
Wheeler, Emily
Woda, Russel
Levitov, Alexander B.
Stawicki, Stanislaw P.
Bahner, David P.
Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title_full Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title_fullStr Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title_short Protocol Failure Detection: The Conflation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Respiratory Dysfunction
title_sort protocol failure detection: the conflation of acute respiratory distress syndrome, sars-cov-2 pneumonia and respiratory dysfunction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_75_21
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnlawrencea protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction
AT wheeleremily protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction
AT wodarussel protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction
AT levitovalexanderb protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction
AT stawickistanislawp protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction
AT bahnerdavidp protocolfailuredetectiontheconflationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesarscov2pneumoniaandrespiratorydysfunction