Cargando…
Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery
BACKGROUND: Surveillance is the cornerstone of surgical site infection prevention programs. The validity of the data collection and awareness of vulnerability to inter-rater variation is crucial for correct interpretation and use of surveillance data. The aim of this study was to investigate the rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01050-w |
_version_ | 1784637927400144896 |
---|---|
author | Verberk, Janneke D. M. van Rooden, Stephanie M. Hetem, David J. Wunderink, Herman F. Vlek, Anne L. M. Meijer, Corianne van Ravensbergen, Eva A. H. Huijskens, Elisabeth G. W. Vainio, Saara J. Bonten, Marc J. M. van Mourik, Maaike S. M. |
author_facet | Verberk, Janneke D. M. van Rooden, Stephanie M. Hetem, David J. Wunderink, Herman F. Vlek, Anne L. M. Meijer, Corianne van Ravensbergen, Eva A. H. Huijskens, Elisabeth G. W. Vainio, Saara J. Bonten, Marc J. M. van Mourik, Maaike S. M. |
author_sort | Verberk, Janneke D. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surveillance is the cornerstone of surgical site infection prevention programs. The validity of the data collection and awareness of vulnerability to inter-rater variation is crucial for correct interpretation and use of surveillance data. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after colorectal surgery in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this multicentre prospective observational study, seven Dutch hospitals performed SSI surveillance after colorectal surgeries performed in 2018 and/or 2019. When executing the surveillance, a local case assessment was performed to calculate the overall percentage agreement between raters within hospitals. Additionally, two case-vignette assessments were performed to estimate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability by calculating a weighted Cohen’s Kappa and Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient. To estimate the validity, answers of the two case-vignettes questionnaires were compared with the answers of an external medical panel. RESULTS: 1111 colorectal surgeries were included in this study with an overall SSI incidence of 8.8% (n = 98). From the local case assessment it was estimated that the overall percent agreement between raters within a hospital was good (mean 95%, range 90–100%). The Cohen’s Kappa estimated for the intra-rater reliability of case-vignette review varied from 0.73 to 1.00, indicating substantial to perfect agreement. The inter-rater reliability within hospitals showed more variation, with Kappa estimates ranging between 0.61 and 0.94. In total, 87.9% of the answers given by the raters were in accordance with the medical panel. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that raters were consistent in their SSI-ascertainment (good reliability), but improvements can be made regarding the accuracy (moderate validity). Accuracy of surveillance may be improved by providing regular training, adapting definitions to reduce subjectivity, and by supporting surveillance through automation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8780777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87807772022-01-21 Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery Verberk, Janneke D. M. van Rooden, Stephanie M. Hetem, David J. Wunderink, Herman F. Vlek, Anne L. M. Meijer, Corianne van Ravensbergen, Eva A. H. Huijskens, Elisabeth G. W. Vainio, Saara J. Bonten, Marc J. M. van Mourik, Maaike S. M. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Surveillance is the cornerstone of surgical site infection prevention programs. The validity of the data collection and awareness of vulnerability to inter-rater variation is crucial for correct interpretation and use of surveillance data. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after colorectal surgery in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this multicentre prospective observational study, seven Dutch hospitals performed SSI surveillance after colorectal surgeries performed in 2018 and/or 2019. When executing the surveillance, a local case assessment was performed to calculate the overall percentage agreement between raters within hospitals. Additionally, two case-vignette assessments were performed to estimate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability by calculating a weighted Cohen’s Kappa and Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient. To estimate the validity, answers of the two case-vignettes questionnaires were compared with the answers of an external medical panel. RESULTS: 1111 colorectal surgeries were included in this study with an overall SSI incidence of 8.8% (n = 98). From the local case assessment it was estimated that the overall percent agreement between raters within a hospital was good (mean 95%, range 90–100%). The Cohen’s Kappa estimated for the intra-rater reliability of case-vignette review varied from 0.73 to 1.00, indicating substantial to perfect agreement. The inter-rater reliability within hospitals showed more variation, with Kappa estimates ranging between 0.61 and 0.94. In total, 87.9% of the answers given by the raters were in accordance with the medical panel. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that raters were consistent in their SSI-ascertainment (good reliability), but improvements can be made regarding the accuracy (moderate validity). Accuracy of surveillance may be improved by providing regular training, adapting definitions to reduce subjectivity, and by supporting surveillance through automation. BioMed Central 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8780777/ /pubmed/35063009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01050-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Verberk, Janneke D. M. van Rooden, Stephanie M. Hetem, David J. Wunderink, Herman F. Vlek, Anne L. M. Meijer, Corianne van Ravensbergen, Eva A. H. Huijskens, Elisabeth G. W. Vainio, Saara J. Bonten, Marc J. M. van Mourik, Maaike S. M. Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title | Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title_full | Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title_short | Reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
title_sort | reliability and validity of multicentre surveillance of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01050-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verberkjannekedm reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT vanroodenstephaniem reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT hetemdavidj reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT wunderinkhermanf reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT vlekannelm reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT meijercorianne reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT vanravensbergenevaah reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT huijskenselisabethgw reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT vainiosaaraj reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT bontenmarcjm reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery AT vanmourikmaaikesm reliabilityandvalidityofmulticentresurveillanceofsurgicalsiteinfectionsaftercolorectalsurgery |