Cargando…

Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia

BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination-Second Edition (MMSE-2) consists of three visions: a brief version (MMSE-2:BV), a standard version (MMSE-2:SV), and an expanded version (MMSE-2: EV). Each version was equipped with alternate forms (blue and red). There was a lack of evidence on the pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ya-Chen, Lee, Shu-Chun, Chiu, En-Chi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7
_version_ 1784637935718498304
author Lee, Ya-Chen
Lee, Shu-Chun
Chiu, En-Chi
author_facet Lee, Ya-Chen
Lee, Shu-Chun
Chiu, En-Chi
author_sort Lee, Ya-Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination-Second Edition (MMSE-2) consists of three visions: a brief version (MMSE-2:BV), a standard version (MMSE-2:SV), and an expanded version (MMSE-2: EV). Each version was equipped with alternate forms (blue and red). There was a lack of evidence on the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the three versions of the MMSE-2, limiting its utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the MMSE-2 in people with dementia. METHODS: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled, of which 60 were administered with the blue form twice (i.e., the same-form group, [SF group]) and 60 were administered with the blue form first and then the red form (alternate-form group, [AF group]). The practice effect was evaluated using a paired t-test and Cohen’s d. The test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the practice effects, in the SF group, no statistically significant differences were found for the MMSE-2:BV and MMSE-2: EV total scores and eight subtests (p = 0.061–1.000), except for the MMSE-2:SV total score (p = 0.029). In the AF group, no statistically significant differences were found for all three versions of the total scores and subtests (p = 0.106–1.000), except for the visual-constructional ability subtest (p = 0.010). Cohen’s d of all three versions’ total scores and subtests were 0.00–0.20 and 0.00–0.26 for SF group and AF group, respectively. For the test-retest reliability, ICC values for all three versions and eight subtests in SF and AF groups were 0.60–0.93 and 0.56–0.93, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the practice effect could be minimized when alternate forms of the MMSE-2 were used. The MMSE-2 had good to excellent test-retest reliability, except for three subtests (i.e., visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall). Caution should be taken when interpreting the results of visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall subtests of the MMSE-2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87808112022-01-21 Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia Lee, Ya-Chen Lee, Shu-Chun Chiu, En-Chi BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination-Second Edition (MMSE-2) consists of three visions: a brief version (MMSE-2:BV), a standard version (MMSE-2:SV), and an expanded version (MMSE-2: EV). Each version was equipped with alternate forms (blue and red). There was a lack of evidence on the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the three versions of the MMSE-2, limiting its utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the MMSE-2 in people with dementia. METHODS: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled, of which 60 were administered with the blue form twice (i.e., the same-form group, [SF group]) and 60 were administered with the blue form first and then the red form (alternate-form group, [AF group]). The practice effect was evaluated using a paired t-test and Cohen’s d. The test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the practice effects, in the SF group, no statistically significant differences were found for the MMSE-2:BV and MMSE-2: EV total scores and eight subtests (p = 0.061–1.000), except for the MMSE-2:SV total score (p = 0.029). In the AF group, no statistically significant differences were found for all three versions of the total scores and subtests (p = 0.106–1.000), except for the visual-constructional ability subtest (p = 0.010). Cohen’s d of all three versions’ total scores and subtests were 0.00–0.20 and 0.00–0.26 for SF group and AF group, respectively. For the test-retest reliability, ICC values for all three versions and eight subtests in SF and AF groups were 0.60–0.93 and 0.56–0.93, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the practice effect could be minimized when alternate forms of the MMSE-2 were used. The MMSE-2 had good to excellent test-retest reliability, except for three subtests (i.e., visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall). Caution should be taken when interpreting the results of visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall subtests of the MMSE-2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7. BioMed Central 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8780811/ /pubmed/35062877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Ya-Chen
Lee, Shu-Chun
Chiu, En-Chi
Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title_full Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title_fullStr Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title_full_unstemmed Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title_short Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia
title_sort practice effect and test-retest reliability of the mini-mental state examination-2 in people with dementia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyachen practiceeffectandtestretestreliabilityoftheminimentalstateexamination2inpeoplewithdementia
AT leeshuchun practiceeffectandtestretestreliabilityoftheminimentalstateexamination2inpeoplewithdementia
AT chiuenchi practiceeffectandtestretestreliabilityoftheminimentalstateexamination2inpeoplewithdementia