Cargando…

Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takaya, Hiroaki, Namisaki, Tadashi, Matsumoto, Kazusuke, Suzuki, Junya, Murata, Koji, Tsuji, Yuki, Nakanishi, Keisuke, Kaji, Kosuke, Kitade, Mitsuteru, Noguchi, Ryuichi, Yoshiji, Hitoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434
_version_ 1784637974510567424
author Takaya, Hiroaki
Namisaki, Tadashi
Matsumoto, Kazusuke
Suzuki, Junya
Murata, Koji
Tsuji, Yuki
Nakanishi, Keisuke
Kaji, Kosuke
Kitade, Mitsuteru
Noguchi, Ryuichi
Yoshiji, Hitoshi
author_facet Takaya, Hiroaki
Namisaki, Tadashi
Matsumoto, Kazusuke
Suzuki, Junya
Murata, Koji
Tsuji, Yuki
Nakanishi, Keisuke
Kaji, Kosuke
Kitade, Mitsuteru
Noguchi, Ryuichi
Yoshiji, Hitoshi
author_sort Takaya, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances. The study included 365 patients with HCCs one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size who underwent RFA using the arfa(®) system (arfa(®) group) or the VIVA(®) system (VIVA(®) group). The total bilirubin (T-Bil) level after RFA was higher in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. With a 3-cm electrode needle, the longest diameter (Dmax) and the shortest diameter were analyzed and found to be greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Furthermore, Dmax with the 2.5-cm electrode needle was greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Statistically significant differences in the ablation area and in the T-Bil value after RFA were observed between the groups; however, these differences are not considered clinical problems because the difference in the ablation area was only slight and the Child–Pugh score was the same between the groups. Thus, hepatologists can use either of the RFA systems based on their preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8780974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87809742022-01-22 Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems Takaya, Hiroaki Namisaki, Tadashi Matsumoto, Kazusuke Suzuki, Junya Murata, Koji Tsuji, Yuki Nakanishi, Keisuke Kaji, Kosuke Kitade, Mitsuteru Noguchi, Ryuichi Yoshiji, Hitoshi J Clin Med Article Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances. The study included 365 patients with HCCs one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size who underwent RFA using the arfa(®) system (arfa(®) group) or the VIVA(®) system (VIVA(®) group). The total bilirubin (T-Bil) level after RFA was higher in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. With a 3-cm electrode needle, the longest diameter (Dmax) and the shortest diameter were analyzed and found to be greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Furthermore, Dmax with the 2.5-cm electrode needle was greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Statistically significant differences in the ablation area and in the T-Bil value after RFA were observed between the groups; however, these differences are not considered clinical problems because the difference in the ablation area was only slight and the Child–Pugh score was the same between the groups. Thus, hepatologists can use either of the RFA systems based on their preference. MDPI 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8780974/ /pubmed/35054128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Takaya, Hiroaki
Namisaki, Tadashi
Matsumoto, Kazusuke
Suzuki, Junya
Murata, Koji
Tsuji, Yuki
Nakanishi, Keisuke
Kaji, Kosuke
Kitade, Mitsuteru
Noguchi, Ryuichi
Yoshiji, Hitoshi
Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title_full Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title_fullStr Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title_short Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
title_sort comparison of ablation area and change in functional liver reserve after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using the arfa(®) and viva(®) systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434
work_keys_str_mv AT takayahiroaki comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT namisakitadashi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT matsumotokazusuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT suzukijunya comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT muratakoji comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT tsujiyuki comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT nakanishikeisuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT kajikosuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT kitademitsuteru comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT noguchiryuichi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems
AT yoshijihitoshi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems