Cargando…
Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434 |
_version_ | 1784637974510567424 |
---|---|
author | Takaya, Hiroaki Namisaki, Tadashi Matsumoto, Kazusuke Suzuki, Junya Murata, Koji Tsuji, Yuki Nakanishi, Keisuke Kaji, Kosuke Kitade, Mitsuteru Noguchi, Ryuichi Yoshiji, Hitoshi |
author_facet | Takaya, Hiroaki Namisaki, Tadashi Matsumoto, Kazusuke Suzuki, Junya Murata, Koji Tsuji, Yuki Nakanishi, Keisuke Kaji, Kosuke Kitade, Mitsuteru Noguchi, Ryuichi Yoshiji, Hitoshi |
author_sort | Takaya, Hiroaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances. The study included 365 patients with HCCs one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size who underwent RFA using the arfa(®) system (arfa(®) group) or the VIVA(®) system (VIVA(®) group). The total bilirubin (T-Bil) level after RFA was higher in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. With a 3-cm electrode needle, the longest diameter (Dmax) and the shortest diameter were analyzed and found to be greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Furthermore, Dmax with the 2.5-cm electrode needle was greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Statistically significant differences in the ablation area and in the T-Bil value after RFA were observed between the groups; however, these differences are not considered clinical problems because the difference in the ablation area was only slight and the Child–Pugh score was the same between the groups. Thus, hepatologists can use either of the RFA systems based on their preference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8780974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87809742022-01-22 Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems Takaya, Hiroaki Namisaki, Tadashi Matsumoto, Kazusuke Suzuki, Junya Murata, Koji Tsuji, Yuki Nakanishi, Keisuke Kaji, Kosuke Kitade, Mitsuteru Noguchi, Ryuichi Yoshiji, Hitoshi J Clin Med Article Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended in Japan for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size. The arfa(®) and VIVA(®) RFA systems are widely used for patients with HCC and this retrospective observational study aims to compare their performances. The study included 365 patients with HCCs one to three in number and ≤3 cm in size who underwent RFA using the arfa(®) system (arfa(®) group) or the VIVA(®) system (VIVA(®) group). The total bilirubin (T-Bil) level after RFA was higher in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. With a 3-cm electrode needle, the longest diameter (Dmax) and the shortest diameter were analyzed and found to be greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Furthermore, Dmax with the 2.5-cm electrode needle was greater in the arfa(®) group than in the VIVA(®) group. Statistically significant differences in the ablation area and in the T-Bil value after RFA were observed between the groups; however, these differences are not considered clinical problems because the difference in the ablation area was only slight and the Child–Pugh score was the same between the groups. Thus, hepatologists can use either of the RFA systems based on their preference. MDPI 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8780974/ /pubmed/35054128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Takaya, Hiroaki Namisaki, Tadashi Matsumoto, Kazusuke Suzuki, Junya Murata, Koji Tsuji, Yuki Nakanishi, Keisuke Kaji, Kosuke Kitade, Mitsuteru Noguchi, Ryuichi Yoshiji, Hitoshi Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title | Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title_full | Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title_short | Comparison of Ablation Area and Change in Functional Liver Reserve after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the arfa(®) and VIVA(®) Systems |
title_sort | comparison of ablation area and change in functional liver reserve after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using the arfa(®) and viva(®) systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takayahiroaki comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT namisakitadashi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT matsumotokazusuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT suzukijunya comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT muratakoji comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT tsujiyuki comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT nakanishikeisuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT kajikosuke comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT kitademitsuteru comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT noguchiryuichi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems AT yoshijihitoshi comparisonofablationareaandchangeinfunctionalliverreserveafterradiofrequencyablationforhepatocellularcarcinomausingthearfaandvivasystems |