Cargando…

Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to answer the question: “Is the use of magnetic mallet effective in oral and implant surgery procedures in terms of tissue healing, surgery outcome, and complication rate compared to traditional instruments?” A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennardo, Francesco, Barone, Selene, Vocaturo, Camillo, Nucci, Ludovica, Antonelli, Alessandro, Giudice, Amerigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010108
_version_ 1784638035362578432
author Bennardo, Francesco
Barone, Selene
Vocaturo, Camillo
Nucci, Ludovica
Antonelli, Alessandro
Giudice, Amerigo
author_facet Bennardo, Francesco
Barone, Selene
Vocaturo, Camillo
Nucci, Ludovica
Antonelli, Alessandro
Giudice, Amerigo
author_sort Bennardo, Francesco
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aimed to answer the question: “Is the use of magnetic mallet effective in oral and implant surgery procedures in terms of tissue healing, surgery outcome, and complication rate compared to traditional instruments?” A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (articles published until 1 October 2021) was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, using the keywords “magnetic mallet”, “electric mallet”, “oral surgery”, “implantology”, and “dental implant”. Of 252 articles, 14 were included in the review (3 for teeth extraction, and 11 for implant dentistry). Out of a total of 619 dental extractions (256 patients) performed with the magnetic mallet (MM), no complications were reported. Implants inserted totaled 880 (525 patients): 640 in the MM groups (382), and 240 in control groups (133). The survival rate of implants was 98.9% in the MM groups, and 95.42% in the control groups. Seven patients experienced benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after implant surgery, all in control groups. Results are not sufficient to establish the effectiveness of MM in oral and implant surgery procedures. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8781210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87812102022-01-22 Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review Bennardo, Francesco Barone, Selene Vocaturo, Camillo Nucci, Ludovica Antonelli, Alessandro Giudice, Amerigo J Pers Med Review This systematic review aimed to answer the question: “Is the use of magnetic mallet effective in oral and implant surgery procedures in terms of tissue healing, surgery outcome, and complication rate compared to traditional instruments?” A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (articles published until 1 October 2021) was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, using the keywords “magnetic mallet”, “electric mallet”, “oral surgery”, “implantology”, and “dental implant”. Of 252 articles, 14 were included in the review (3 for teeth extraction, and 11 for implant dentistry). Out of a total of 619 dental extractions (256 patients) performed with the magnetic mallet (MM), no complications were reported. Implants inserted totaled 880 (525 patients): 640 in the MM groups (382), and 240 in control groups (133). The survival rate of implants was 98.9% in the MM groups, and 95.42% in the control groups. Seven patients experienced benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after implant surgery, all in control groups. Results are not sufficient to establish the effectiveness of MM in oral and implant surgery procedures. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed. MDPI 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8781210/ /pubmed/35055423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010108 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bennardo, Francesco
Barone, Selene
Vocaturo, Camillo
Nucci, Ludovica
Antonelli, Alessandro
Giudice, Amerigo
Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title_full Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title_short Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review
title_sort usefulness of magnetic mallet in oral surgery and implantology: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35055423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010108
work_keys_str_mv AT bennardofrancesco usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview
AT baroneselene usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview
AT vocaturocamillo usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview
AT nucciludovica usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview
AT antonellialessandro usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview
AT giudiceamerigo usefulnessofmagneticmalletinoralsurgeryandimplantologyasystematicreview