Cargando…

Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE: Continuing health provider education (HPE) is an important intervention supported by health policy to counter the opioid epidemic; knowledge regarding appropriate program design and evaluation is lacking. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of evaluations of opioid-rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sud, Abhimanyu, Molska, Graziella R., Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004186
_version_ 1784638039052517376
author Sud, Abhimanyu
Molska, Graziella R.
Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio
author_facet Sud, Abhimanyu
Molska, Graziella R.
Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio
author_sort Sud, Abhimanyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Continuing health provider education (HPE) is an important intervention supported by health policy to counter the opioid epidemic; knowledge regarding appropriate program design and evaluation is lacking. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of evaluations of opioid-related continuing HPE programs and their appropriateness as interventions to improve population health. METHOD: In January 2020, the authors conducted a systematic search of 7 databases, seeking studies of HPE programs on opioid analgesic prescribing and overdose prevention. Reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of all studies and then assessed the full texts of all studies potentially eligible for inclusion. The authors extracted a range of data using categories for evaluating complex programs: the use of theory, program purpose, inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and industry involvement. Results were reported in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine reports on 32 distinct HPE programs met inclusion criteria. Of these 32, 31 (97%) were U.S./Canadian programs and 28 (88%) were reported after 2010. Measurements of changes in knowledge and confidence were common. Performance outcomes were less common and typically self-reported. Most studies (n = 27 [84%]) used concerns of opioid-related harms at the population health level to justify the educational intervention, but only 5 (16%) measured patient- or population-level outcomes directly related to the educational programs. Six programs (19%) had direct or indirect opioid manufacturer involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing HPE has been promoted as an important means of addressing population-level opioid-related harms by policymakers and educators, yet published evaluations of HPE programs focusing on opioid analgesics inadequately evaluate patient- or population-level outcomes. Instead, they primarily focus on self-reported performance outcomes. Conceptual models are needed to guide the development and evaluation of continuing HPE programs intended to have population health benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8781229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87812292022-01-21 Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review Sud, Abhimanyu Molska, Graziella R. Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio Acad Med Reviews PURPOSE: Continuing health provider education (HPE) is an important intervention supported by health policy to counter the opioid epidemic; knowledge regarding appropriate program design and evaluation is lacking. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of evaluations of opioid-related continuing HPE programs and their appropriateness as interventions to improve population health. METHOD: In January 2020, the authors conducted a systematic search of 7 databases, seeking studies of HPE programs on opioid analgesic prescribing and overdose prevention. Reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of all studies and then assessed the full texts of all studies potentially eligible for inclusion. The authors extracted a range of data using categories for evaluating complex programs: the use of theory, program purpose, inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and industry involvement. Results were reported in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine reports on 32 distinct HPE programs met inclusion criteria. Of these 32, 31 (97%) were U.S./Canadian programs and 28 (88%) were reported after 2010. Measurements of changes in knowledge and confidence were common. Performance outcomes were less common and typically self-reported. Most studies (n = 27 [84%]) used concerns of opioid-related harms at the population health level to justify the educational intervention, but only 5 (16%) measured patient- or population-level outcomes directly related to the educational programs. Six programs (19%) had direct or indirect opioid manufacturer involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing HPE has been promoted as an important means of addressing population-level opioid-related harms by policymakers and educators, yet published evaluations of HPE programs focusing on opioid analgesics inadequately evaluate patient- or population-level outcomes. Instead, they primarily focus on self-reported performance outcomes. Conceptual models are needed to guide the development and evaluation of continuing HPE programs intended to have population health benefits. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-01 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8781229/ /pubmed/34074902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004186 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reviews
Sud, Abhimanyu
Molska, Graziella R.
Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio
Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title_full Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title_short Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review
title_sort evaluations of continuing health provider education focused on opioid prescribing: a scoping review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004186
work_keys_str_mv AT sudabhimanyu evaluationsofcontinuinghealthprovidereducationfocusedonopioidprescribingascopingreview
AT molskagraziellar evaluationsofcontinuinghealthprovidereducationfocusedonopioidprescribingascopingreview
AT salamancabuentellofabio evaluationsofcontinuinghealthprovidereducationfocusedonopioidprescribingascopingreview