Cargando…
A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484 |
_version_ | 1784638042921762816 |
---|---|
author | Balam, Abraham Pech-Pisté, Raúl Valdez-Nava, Zarel Gamboa, Fidel Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro Avilés, Francis |
author_facet | Balam, Abraham Pech-Pisté, Raúl Valdez-Nava, Zarel Gamboa, Fidel Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro Avilés, Francis |
author_sort | Balam, Abraham |
collection | PubMed |
description | The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical response to frequency (f) and strain (piezoimpedance) is characterized using two configurations, namely one that promotes resistive dominance (resistive configuration) and the other that promotes the permittivity/capacitive contribution (dielectric configuration). For the resistive configuration, the frequency response indicated a resistive–capacitive (RC) behavior (negative phase angle, θ), with a significant contribution of capacitance for frequencies of 10(4) Hz and above, depending on the nanotube content. The piezoimpedance characterization in the resistive configuration yielded an increasing impedance modulus (|Z|) and an increasing (negative) value of θ as the strain increased. The piezoimpedance sensitivity at f = 10 kHz was ~30% higher than the corresponding DC piezoresistive sensitivity, yielding a sensitivity factor of 9.9 for |Z| and a higher sensitivity factor (~12.7) for θ. The dielectric configuration enhanced the permittivity contribution to impedance, but it was the least sensitive to strain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8781245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87812452022-01-22 A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current Balam, Abraham Pech-Pisté, Raúl Valdez-Nava, Zarel Gamboa, Fidel Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro Avilés, Francis Sensors (Basel) Article The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical response to frequency (f) and strain (piezoimpedance) is characterized using two configurations, namely one that promotes resistive dominance (resistive configuration) and the other that promotes the permittivity/capacitive contribution (dielectric configuration). For the resistive configuration, the frequency response indicated a resistive–capacitive (RC) behavior (negative phase angle, θ), with a significant contribution of capacitance for frequencies of 10(4) Hz and above, depending on the nanotube content. The piezoimpedance characterization in the resistive configuration yielded an increasing impedance modulus (|Z|) and an increasing (negative) value of θ as the strain increased. The piezoimpedance sensitivity at f = 10 kHz was ~30% higher than the corresponding DC piezoresistive sensitivity, yielding a sensitivity factor of 9.9 for |Z| and a higher sensitivity factor (~12.7) for θ. The dielectric configuration enhanced the permittivity contribution to impedance, but it was the least sensitive to strain. MDPI 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8781245/ /pubmed/35062444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Balam, Abraham Pech-Pisté, Raúl Valdez-Nava, Zarel Gamboa, Fidel Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro Avilés, Francis A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title | A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title_full | A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title_short | A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current |
title_sort | comparative study of the electrical and electromechanical responses of carbon nanotube/polypropylene composites in alternating and direct current |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balamabraham acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT pechpisteraul acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT valdeznavazarel acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT gamboafidel acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT castilloatochealejandro acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT avilesfrancis acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT balamabraham comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT pechpisteraul comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT valdeznavazarel comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT gamboafidel comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT castilloatochealejandro comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent AT avilesfrancis comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent |