Cargando…

A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current

The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balam, Abraham, Pech-Pisté, Raúl, Valdez-Nava, Zarel, Gamboa, Fidel, Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro, Avilés, Francis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484
_version_ 1784638042921762816
author Balam, Abraham
Pech-Pisté, Raúl
Valdez-Nava, Zarel
Gamboa, Fidel
Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro
Avilés, Francis
author_facet Balam, Abraham
Pech-Pisté, Raúl
Valdez-Nava, Zarel
Gamboa, Fidel
Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro
Avilés, Francis
author_sort Balam, Abraham
collection PubMed
description The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical response to frequency (f) and strain (piezoimpedance) is characterized using two configurations, namely one that promotes resistive dominance (resistive configuration) and the other that promotes the permittivity/capacitive contribution (dielectric configuration). For the resistive configuration, the frequency response indicated a resistive–capacitive (RC) behavior (negative phase angle, θ), with a significant contribution of capacitance for frequencies of 10(4) Hz and above, depending on the nanotube content. The piezoimpedance characterization in the resistive configuration yielded an increasing impedance modulus (|Z|) and an increasing (negative) value of θ as the strain increased. The piezoimpedance sensitivity at f = 10 kHz was ~30% higher than the corresponding DC piezoresistive sensitivity, yielding a sensitivity factor of 9.9 for |Z| and a higher sensitivity factor (~12.7) for θ. The dielectric configuration enhanced the permittivity contribution to impedance, but it was the least sensitive to strain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8781245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87812452022-01-22 A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current Balam, Abraham Pech-Pisté, Raúl Valdez-Nava, Zarel Gamboa, Fidel Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro Avilés, Francis Sensors (Basel) Article The electrical and electromechanical responses of ~200 µm thick extruded nanocomposite films comprising of 4 wt.% and 5 wt.% multiwall carbon nanotubes mixed with polypropylene are investigated under an alternating current (AC) and compared to their direct current (DC) response. The AC electrical response to frequency (f) and strain (piezoimpedance) is characterized using two configurations, namely one that promotes resistive dominance (resistive configuration) and the other that promotes the permittivity/capacitive contribution (dielectric configuration). For the resistive configuration, the frequency response indicated a resistive–capacitive (RC) behavior (negative phase angle, θ), with a significant contribution of capacitance for frequencies of 10(4) Hz and above, depending on the nanotube content. The piezoimpedance characterization in the resistive configuration yielded an increasing impedance modulus (|Z|) and an increasing (negative) value of θ as the strain increased. The piezoimpedance sensitivity at f = 10 kHz was ~30% higher than the corresponding DC piezoresistive sensitivity, yielding a sensitivity factor of 9.9 for |Z| and a higher sensitivity factor (~12.7) for θ. The dielectric configuration enhanced the permittivity contribution to impedance, but it was the least sensitive to strain. MDPI 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8781245/ /pubmed/35062444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Balam, Abraham
Pech-Pisté, Raúl
Valdez-Nava, Zarel
Gamboa, Fidel
Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro
Avilés, Francis
A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title_full A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title_short A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Electromechanical Responses of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites in Alternating and Direct Current
title_sort comparative study of the electrical and electromechanical responses of carbon nanotube/polypropylene composites in alternating and direct current
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020484
work_keys_str_mv AT balamabraham acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT pechpisteraul acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT valdeznavazarel acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT gamboafidel acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT castilloatochealejandro acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT avilesfrancis acomparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT balamabraham comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT pechpisteraul comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT valdeznavazarel comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT gamboafidel comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT castilloatochealejandro comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent
AT avilesfrancis comparativestudyoftheelectricalandelectromechanicalresponsesofcarbonnanotubepolypropylenecompositesinalternatinganddirectcurrent