Cargando…

Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of screw-tip augmented locking plate osteosynthesis (STA) vs primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 60 patients (age >65 years) with a displace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siebenbürger, Georg, Fleischhacker, Evi, Stumpf, Ulla, Helfen, Tobias, Böcker, Wolfgang, Ockert, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211039026
_version_ 1784638051268427776
author Siebenbürger, Georg
Fleischhacker, Evi
Stumpf, Ulla
Helfen, Tobias
Böcker, Wolfgang
Ockert, Ben
author_facet Siebenbürger, Georg
Fleischhacker, Evi
Stumpf, Ulla
Helfen, Tobias
Böcker, Wolfgang
Ockert, Ben
author_sort Siebenbürger, Georg
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of screw-tip augmented locking plate osteosynthesis (STA) vs primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 60 patients (age >65 years) with a displaced proximal humeral fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate and fluoroscopy controlled screw-tip augmentation. Sixty matched individuals (age, gender, fracture pattern, and mean follow-up) treated by RSA for fractures were identified from the institutional database and outcomes as well as occurring complications and need for revision surgery were compared. RESULTS: At 39 months’ follow-up, 25 patients in the STA group (mean age 74.5 ± 12 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean Constant Score (CS) of 68 ± 18.8 points. Mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 ± 19.8%. Of 60 matched individuals in the RSA group, 22 patients (mean age 78.9 ± 8.2 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean CS of 60.6 ± 21.2 points (P = .33), and the mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 (74.7 ± 18.6)% (P = .14). The overall complication rate in STA group was 32% (secondary varus or valgus displacement >10°, n = 4, avascular necrosis, n = 4). In RSA group, the overall complication rate was 4.5% (P = <.05). We observed one early onset infection. Revision surgery with removal of the prosthesis and PMMA spacer implantation for two-stage revision was necessary. The follow-up rate was 41.7 vs 36.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-tip augmented locked plating and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty result in comparable satisfying functional outcome 3 years following a displaced proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. However, we noted a higher complication and revision rate in the STA group. In contrast, primary reversed shoulder arthroplasty resulted in a lower rate of complications and revisions, which may be beneficial in elderly patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8781273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87812732022-01-22 Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months Siebenbürger, Georg Fleischhacker, Evi Stumpf, Ulla Helfen, Tobias Böcker, Wolfgang Ockert, Ben Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of screw-tip augmented locking plate osteosynthesis (STA) vs primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 60 patients (age >65 years) with a displaced proximal humeral fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate and fluoroscopy controlled screw-tip augmentation. Sixty matched individuals (age, gender, fracture pattern, and mean follow-up) treated by RSA for fractures were identified from the institutional database and outcomes as well as occurring complications and need for revision surgery were compared. RESULTS: At 39 months’ follow-up, 25 patients in the STA group (mean age 74.5 ± 12 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean Constant Score (CS) of 68 ± 18.8 points. Mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 ± 19.8%. Of 60 matched individuals in the RSA group, 22 patients (mean age 78.9 ± 8.2 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean CS of 60.6 ± 21.2 points (P = .33), and the mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 (74.7 ± 18.6)% (P = .14). The overall complication rate in STA group was 32% (secondary varus or valgus displacement >10°, n = 4, avascular necrosis, n = 4). In RSA group, the overall complication rate was 4.5% (P = <.05). We observed one early onset infection. Revision surgery with removal of the prosthesis and PMMA spacer implantation for two-stage revision was necessary. The follow-up rate was 41.7 vs 36.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-tip augmented locked plating and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty result in comparable satisfying functional outcome 3 years following a displaced proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. However, we noted a higher complication and revision rate in the STA group. In contrast, primary reversed shoulder arthroplasty resulted in a lower rate of complications and revisions, which may be beneficial in elderly patients. SAGE Publications 2021-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8781273/ /pubmed/35070475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211039026 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Siebenbürger, Georg
Fleischhacker, Evi
Stumpf, Ulla
Helfen, Tobias
Böcker, Wolfgang
Ockert, Ben
Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title_full Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title_fullStr Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title_full_unstemmed Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title_short Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months
title_sort screw-tip augmented locked plating versus primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in displaced proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study with a mean follow-up of 39 months
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211039026
work_keys_str_mv AT siebenburgergeorg screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months
AT fleischhackerevi screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months
AT stumpfulla screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months
AT helfentobias screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months
AT bockerwolfgang screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months
AT ockertben screwtipaugmentedlockedplatingversusprimaryreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyindisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudywithameanfollowupof39months