Cargando…
Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090 |
_version_ | 1784638064017014784 |
---|---|
author | Clementz, Brett A Parker, David A Trotti, Rebekah L McDowell, Jennifer E Keedy, Sarah K Keshavan, Matcheri S Pearlson, Godfrey D Gershon, Elliot S Ivleva, Elena I Huang, Ling-Yu Hill, S Kristian Sweeney, John A Thomas, Olivia Hudgens-Haney, Matthew Gibbons, Robert D Tamminga, Carol A |
author_facet | Clementz, Brett A Parker, David A Trotti, Rebekah L McDowell, Jennifer E Keedy, Sarah K Keshavan, Matcheri S Pearlson, Godfrey D Gershon, Elliot S Ivleva, Elena I Huang, Ling-Yu Hill, S Kristian Sweeney, John A Thomas, Olivia Hudgens-Haney, Matthew Gibbons, Robert D Tamminga, Carol A |
author_sort | Clementz, Brett A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I disorder with psychosis, presentations with clinical features of hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, affective, or negative symptoms. A biomarker approach to subtyping psychosis cases (called psychosis Biotypes) captured neurobiological homology that was missed by conventional clinical diagnoses. Two samples (called “B-SNIP1” with 711 psychosis and 274 healthy persons, and the “replication sample” with 717 psychosis and 198 healthy persons) showed that 44 individual biomarkers, drawn from general cognition (BACS), motor inhibitory (stop signal), saccadic system (pro- and anti-saccades), and auditory EEG/ERP (paired-stimuli and oddball) tasks of psychosis-relevant brain functions were replicable (r’s from .96–.99) and temporally stable (r’s from .76–.95). Using numerical taxonomy (k-means clustering) with nine groups of integrated biomarker characteristics (called bio-factors) yielded three Biotypes that were virtually identical between the two samples and showed highly similar case assignments to subgroups based on cross-validations (88.5%–89%). Biotypes-1 and -2 shared poor cognition. Biotype-1 was further characterized by low neural response magnitudes, while Biotype-2 was further characterized by overactive neural responses and poor sensory motor inhibition. Biotype-3 was nearly normal on all bio-factors. Construct validation of Biotype EEG/ERP neurophysiology using measures of intrinsic neural activity and auditory steady state stimulation highlighted the robustness of these outcomes. Psychosis Biotypes may yield meaningful neurobiological targets for treatments and etiological investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8781330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87813302022-01-21 Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium Clementz, Brett A Parker, David A Trotti, Rebekah L McDowell, Jennifer E Keedy, Sarah K Keshavan, Matcheri S Pearlson, Godfrey D Gershon, Elliot S Ivleva, Elena I Huang, Ling-Yu Hill, S Kristian Sweeney, John A Thomas, Olivia Hudgens-Haney, Matthew Gibbons, Robert D Tamminga, Carol A Schizophr Bull Regular Articles Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I disorder with psychosis, presentations with clinical features of hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, affective, or negative symptoms. A biomarker approach to subtyping psychosis cases (called psychosis Biotypes) captured neurobiological homology that was missed by conventional clinical diagnoses. Two samples (called “B-SNIP1” with 711 psychosis and 274 healthy persons, and the “replication sample” with 717 psychosis and 198 healthy persons) showed that 44 individual biomarkers, drawn from general cognition (BACS), motor inhibitory (stop signal), saccadic system (pro- and anti-saccades), and auditory EEG/ERP (paired-stimuli and oddball) tasks of psychosis-relevant brain functions were replicable (r’s from .96–.99) and temporally stable (r’s from .76–.95). Using numerical taxonomy (k-means clustering) with nine groups of integrated biomarker characteristics (called bio-factors) yielded three Biotypes that were virtually identical between the two samples and showed highly similar case assignments to subgroups based on cross-validations (88.5%–89%). Biotypes-1 and -2 shared poor cognition. Biotype-1 was further characterized by low neural response magnitudes, while Biotype-2 was further characterized by overactive neural responses and poor sensory motor inhibition. Biotype-3 was nearly normal on all bio-factors. Construct validation of Biotype EEG/ERP neurophysiology using measures of intrinsic neural activity and auditory steady state stimulation highlighted the robustness of these outcomes. Psychosis Biotypes may yield meaningful neurobiological targets for treatments and etiological investigations. Oxford University Press 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8781330/ /pubmed/34409449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Clementz, Brett A Parker, David A Trotti, Rebekah L McDowell, Jennifer E Keedy, Sarah K Keshavan, Matcheri S Pearlson, Godfrey D Gershon, Elliot S Ivleva, Elena I Huang, Ling-Yu Hill, S Kristian Sweeney, John A Thomas, Olivia Hudgens-Haney, Matthew Gibbons, Robert D Tamminga, Carol A Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title | Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title_full | Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title_fullStr | Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title_short | Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium |
title_sort | psychosis biotypes: replication and validation from the b-snip consortium |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clementzbretta psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT parkerdavida psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT trottirebekahl psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT mcdowelljennifere psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT keedysarahk psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT keshavanmatcheris psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT pearlsongodfreyd psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT gershonelliots psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT ivlevaelenai psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT huanglingyu psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT hillskristian psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT sweeneyjohna psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT thomasolivia psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT hudgenshaneymatthew psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT gibbonsrobertd psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium AT tammingacarola psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium |