Cargando…

Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium

Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clementz, Brett A, Parker, David A, Trotti, Rebekah L, McDowell, Jennifer E, Keedy, Sarah K, Keshavan, Matcheri S, Pearlson, Godfrey D, Gershon, Elliot S, Ivleva, Elena I, Huang, Ling-Yu, Hill, S Kristian, Sweeney, John A, Thomas, Olivia, Hudgens-Haney, Matthew, Gibbons, Robert D, Tamminga, Carol A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090
_version_ 1784638064017014784
author Clementz, Brett A
Parker, David A
Trotti, Rebekah L
McDowell, Jennifer E
Keedy, Sarah K
Keshavan, Matcheri S
Pearlson, Godfrey D
Gershon, Elliot S
Ivleva, Elena I
Huang, Ling-Yu
Hill, S Kristian
Sweeney, John A
Thomas, Olivia
Hudgens-Haney, Matthew
Gibbons, Robert D
Tamminga, Carol A
author_facet Clementz, Brett A
Parker, David A
Trotti, Rebekah L
McDowell, Jennifer E
Keedy, Sarah K
Keshavan, Matcheri S
Pearlson, Godfrey D
Gershon, Elliot S
Ivleva, Elena I
Huang, Ling-Yu
Hill, S Kristian
Sweeney, John A
Thomas, Olivia
Hudgens-Haney, Matthew
Gibbons, Robert D
Tamminga, Carol A
author_sort Clementz, Brett A
collection PubMed
description Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I disorder with psychosis, presentations with clinical features of hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, affective, or negative symptoms. A biomarker approach to subtyping psychosis cases (called psychosis Biotypes) captured neurobiological homology that was missed by conventional clinical diagnoses. Two samples (called “B-SNIP1” with 711 psychosis and 274 healthy persons, and the “replication sample” with 717 psychosis and 198 healthy persons) showed that 44 individual biomarkers, drawn from general cognition (BACS), motor inhibitory (stop signal), saccadic system (pro- and anti-saccades), and auditory EEG/ERP (paired-stimuli and oddball) tasks of psychosis-relevant brain functions were replicable (r’s from .96–.99) and temporally stable (r’s from .76–.95). Using numerical taxonomy (k-means clustering) with nine groups of integrated biomarker characteristics (called bio-factors) yielded three Biotypes that were virtually identical between the two samples and showed highly similar case assignments to subgroups based on cross-validations (88.5%–89%). Biotypes-1 and -2 shared poor cognition. Biotype-1 was further characterized by low neural response magnitudes, while Biotype-2 was further characterized by overactive neural responses and poor sensory motor inhibition. Biotype-3 was nearly normal on all bio-factors. Construct validation of Biotype EEG/ERP neurophysiology using measures of intrinsic neural activity and auditory steady state stimulation highlighted the robustness of these outcomes. Psychosis Biotypes may yield meaningful neurobiological targets for treatments and etiological investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8781330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87813302022-01-21 Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium Clementz, Brett A Parker, David A Trotti, Rebekah L McDowell, Jennifer E Keedy, Sarah K Keshavan, Matcheri S Pearlson, Godfrey D Gershon, Elliot S Ivleva, Elena I Huang, Ling-Yu Hill, S Kristian Sweeney, John A Thomas, Olivia Hudgens-Haney, Matthew Gibbons, Robert D Tamminga, Carol A Schizophr Bull Regular Articles Current clinical phenomenological diagnosis in psychiatry neither captures biologically homologous disease entities nor allows for individualized treatment prescriptions based on neurobiology. In this report, we studied two large samples of cases with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar I disorder with psychosis, presentations with clinical features of hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, affective, or negative symptoms. A biomarker approach to subtyping psychosis cases (called psychosis Biotypes) captured neurobiological homology that was missed by conventional clinical diagnoses. Two samples (called “B-SNIP1” with 711 psychosis and 274 healthy persons, and the “replication sample” with 717 psychosis and 198 healthy persons) showed that 44 individual biomarkers, drawn from general cognition (BACS), motor inhibitory (stop signal), saccadic system (pro- and anti-saccades), and auditory EEG/ERP (paired-stimuli and oddball) tasks of psychosis-relevant brain functions were replicable (r’s from .96–.99) and temporally stable (r’s from .76–.95). Using numerical taxonomy (k-means clustering) with nine groups of integrated biomarker characteristics (called bio-factors) yielded three Biotypes that were virtually identical between the two samples and showed highly similar case assignments to subgroups based on cross-validations (88.5%–89%). Biotypes-1 and -2 shared poor cognition. Biotype-1 was further characterized by low neural response magnitudes, while Biotype-2 was further characterized by overactive neural responses and poor sensory motor inhibition. Biotype-3 was nearly normal on all bio-factors. Construct validation of Biotype EEG/ERP neurophysiology using measures of intrinsic neural activity and auditory steady state stimulation highlighted the robustness of these outcomes. Psychosis Biotypes may yield meaningful neurobiological targets for treatments and etiological investigations. Oxford University Press 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8781330/ /pubmed/34409449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Clementz, Brett A
Parker, David A
Trotti, Rebekah L
McDowell, Jennifer E
Keedy, Sarah K
Keshavan, Matcheri S
Pearlson, Godfrey D
Gershon, Elliot S
Ivleva, Elena I
Huang, Ling-Yu
Hill, S Kristian
Sweeney, John A
Thomas, Olivia
Hudgens-Haney, Matthew
Gibbons, Robert D
Tamminga, Carol A
Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title_full Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title_fullStr Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title_full_unstemmed Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title_short Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium
title_sort psychosis biotypes: replication and validation from the b-snip consortium
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab090
work_keys_str_mv AT clementzbretta psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT parkerdavida psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT trottirebekahl psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT mcdowelljennifere psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT keedysarahk psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT keshavanmatcheris psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT pearlsongodfreyd psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT gershonelliots psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT ivlevaelenai psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT huanglingyu psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT hillskristian psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT sweeneyjohna psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT thomasolivia psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT hudgenshaneymatthew psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT gibbonsrobertd psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium
AT tammingacarola psychosisbiotypesreplicationandvalidationfromthebsnipconsortium