Cargando…

Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study

BACKGROUND: Screening for atrial fibrillation has the potential to significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, questions in regard to how to screen, on whom to screen, and the optimal setting of screening remain unanswered. OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of a federa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gognieva, Daria, Vishnyakova, Nelly, Mitina, Yulia, Chomakhidze, Petr, Mesitskaya, Dinara, Kuznetsova, Natalia, Khiari, Mohamed, Ryabykina, Galina, Boytsov, Sergey, Syrkin, Abram, Saner, Hugo, Kopylov, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174045
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1057
_version_ 1784638241854455808
author Gognieva, Daria
Vishnyakova, Nelly
Mitina, Yulia
Chomakhidze, Petr
Mesitskaya, Dinara
Kuznetsova, Natalia
Khiari, Mohamed
Ryabykina, Galina
Boytsov, Sergey
Syrkin, Abram
Saner, Hugo
Kopylov, Philipp
author_facet Gognieva, Daria
Vishnyakova, Nelly
Mitina, Yulia
Chomakhidze, Petr
Mesitskaya, Dinara
Kuznetsova, Natalia
Khiari, Mohamed
Ryabykina, Galina
Boytsov, Sergey
Syrkin, Abram
Saner, Hugo
Kopylov, Philipp
author_sort Gognieva, Daria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for atrial fibrillation has the potential to significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, questions in regard to how to screen, on whom to screen, and the optimal setting of screening remain unanswered. OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of a federal cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation (AF) screening and remote heart rhythm monitoring in patients at high cardiovascular risk in a mixed urban and rural population in Russia. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study including 3249 individuals with high cardiovascular risk (mean age 56 ± 12.8 years) from the larger Moscow region who were screened for AF using a smartphone-case based single-lead ECG monitor over a period of 18 month. The endpoints were considered as number of newly diagnosed AF; mean time to diagnosis; number of patients for the first time assigned to anticoagulation therapy; frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: A trial fibrillation was diagnosed in 126 patients, 36 of them for the first time. The mean time to diagnosis was 3 ± 2 days. Of 36 patients, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥1 in 34 cases, ≥2 in 29 cases. Anticoagulant therapy was first induced in 31 patients. One death in newly diagnosed group and two deaths in chronic group were registered. There were a total of eight hospitalizations: one in newly diagnosed and seven in chronic AF patients. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a Federal AF screening system in patients at high cardiovascular risk by using a smartphone-case based single lead ECG which is supported by centrally located ECG specialist and central data management is feasible and reliable when performed in a mixed urban and rural area. Further studies are needed to evaluate the full potential of this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8782096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87820962022-02-15 Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study Gognieva, Daria Vishnyakova, Nelly Mitina, Yulia Chomakhidze, Petr Mesitskaya, Dinara Kuznetsova, Natalia Khiari, Mohamed Ryabykina, Galina Boytsov, Sergey Syrkin, Abram Saner, Hugo Kopylov, Philipp Glob Heart Original Research BACKGROUND: Screening for atrial fibrillation has the potential to significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, questions in regard to how to screen, on whom to screen, and the optimal setting of screening remain unanswered. OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of a federal cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation (AF) screening and remote heart rhythm monitoring in patients at high cardiovascular risk in a mixed urban and rural population in Russia. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study including 3249 individuals with high cardiovascular risk (mean age 56 ± 12.8 years) from the larger Moscow region who were screened for AF using a smartphone-case based single-lead ECG monitor over a period of 18 month. The endpoints were considered as number of newly diagnosed AF; mean time to diagnosis; number of patients for the first time assigned to anticoagulation therapy; frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: A trial fibrillation was diagnosed in 126 patients, 36 of them for the first time. The mean time to diagnosis was 3 ± 2 days. Of 36 patients, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥1 in 34 cases, ≥2 in 29 cases. Anticoagulant therapy was first induced in 31 patients. One death in newly diagnosed group and two deaths in chronic group were registered. There were a total of eight hospitalizations: one in newly diagnosed and seven in chronic AF patients. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a Federal AF screening system in patients at high cardiovascular risk by using a smartphone-case based single lead ECG which is supported by centrally located ECG specialist and central data management is feasible and reliable when performed in a mixed urban and rural area. Further studies are needed to evaluate the full potential of this approach. Ubiquity Press 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8782096/ /pubmed/35174045 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1057 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gognieva, Daria
Vishnyakova, Nelly
Mitina, Yulia
Chomakhidze, Petr
Mesitskaya, Dinara
Kuznetsova, Natalia
Khiari, Mohamed
Ryabykina, Galina
Boytsov, Sergey
Syrkin, Abram
Saner, Hugo
Kopylov, Philipp
Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title_full Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title_fullStr Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title_full_unstemmed Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title_short Remote Screening for Atrial Fibrillation by a Federal Cardiac Monitoring System in Primary Care Patients in Russia: Results from the Prospective Interventional Multicenter FECAS-AFS Study
title_sort remote screening for atrial fibrillation by a federal cardiac monitoring system in primary care patients in russia: results from the prospective interventional multicenter fecas-afs study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174045
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1057
work_keys_str_mv AT gognievadaria remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT vishnyakovanelly remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT mitinayulia remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT chomakhidzepetr remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT mesitskayadinara remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT kuznetsovanatalia remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT khiarimohamed remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT ryabykinagalina remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT boytsovsergey remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT syrkinabram remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT sanerhugo remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy
AT kopylovphilipp remotescreeningforatrialfibrillationbyafederalcardiacmonitoringsysteminprimarycarepatientsinrussiaresultsfromtheprospectiveinterventionalmulticenterfecasafsstudy