Cargando…

Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?

INTRODUCTION: Residency applicants use multiple resources to guide their application process including the Student Doctor Network (SDN), a publicly available online forum for the discussion of various topics in medical education. In recent years, specialty-specific forums for residency applicants to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnarr, Sean B., Gonzalez, Victoria, Chhabra, Neeraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060870
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53581
_version_ 1784638249568829440
author Schnarr, Sean B.
Gonzalez, Victoria
Chhabra, Neeraj
author_facet Schnarr, Sean B.
Gonzalez, Victoria
Chhabra, Neeraj
author_sort Schnarr, Sean B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Residency applicants use multiple resources to guide their application process including the Student Doctor Network (SDN), a publicly available online forum for the discussion of various topics in medical education. In recent years, specialty-specific forums for residency applicants to self-report their own application information have become popular. These forums allow other applicants to review self-reported data from their peers to inform their own application process. The accuracy of this resource is unknown. To determine whether the SDN is an accurate source of information for emergency medicine (EM) applicants, we compared self-reported SDN data to objective data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed self-reported SDN data by DO and MD candidates from EM forums for the 2014, 2016, and 2018 residency application cycles. These data were compared to the NRMP charting outcomes for each respective year. RESULTS: A total of 360 EM applicants self-reported data on the SDN during the years reviewed. The majority of these applicants (79%) posted for the 2018 application cycle following transition to a Google Docs spreadsheet. For the first two years of analysis, mean United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores were similar to SDN reports. For the most recent year studied, applicants who posted to SDN reported higher mean (USMLE) Step 1 (234, 95% confidence interval [CI], 233–236) and Step 2 scores (250, 95% CI, 248–251) when compared to NRMP data (231 and 241). Reported contiguous residency program ranks were similar to NRMP in all years, and the proportion indicating Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership was similar to NRMP only for the most recent year studied. CONCLUSION: Self-reporting on SDN showed a slight bias toward higher USMLE step scores in the most recent year when compared to objective NRMP data. Self-reporting on SDN has increased in recent years, but it is unknown whether this increase will lead to more accurate information for EM applicants. Given the self-reported nature of the SDN, applicants should use SDN forums with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8782126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87821262022-01-26 Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants? Schnarr, Sean B. Gonzalez, Victoria Chhabra, Neeraj West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Residency applicants use multiple resources to guide their application process including the Student Doctor Network (SDN), a publicly available online forum for the discussion of various topics in medical education. In recent years, specialty-specific forums for residency applicants to self-report their own application information have become popular. These forums allow other applicants to review self-reported data from their peers to inform their own application process. The accuracy of this resource is unknown. To determine whether the SDN is an accurate source of information for emergency medicine (EM) applicants, we compared self-reported SDN data to objective data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed self-reported SDN data by DO and MD candidates from EM forums for the 2014, 2016, and 2018 residency application cycles. These data were compared to the NRMP charting outcomes for each respective year. RESULTS: A total of 360 EM applicants self-reported data on the SDN during the years reviewed. The majority of these applicants (79%) posted for the 2018 application cycle following transition to a Google Docs spreadsheet. For the first two years of analysis, mean United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores were similar to SDN reports. For the most recent year studied, applicants who posted to SDN reported higher mean (USMLE) Step 1 (234, 95% confidence interval [CI], 233–236) and Step 2 scores (250, 95% CI, 248–251) when compared to NRMP data (231 and 241). Reported contiguous residency program ranks were similar to NRMP in all years, and the proportion indicating Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership was similar to NRMP only for the most recent year studied. CONCLUSION: Self-reporting on SDN showed a slight bias toward higher USMLE step scores in the most recent year when compared to objective NRMP data. Self-reporting on SDN has increased in recent years, but it is unknown whether this increase will lead to more accurate information for EM applicants. Given the self-reported nature of the SDN, applicants should use SDN forums with caution. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022-01 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8782126/ /pubmed/35060870 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53581 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Schnarr et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Schnarr, Sean B.
Gonzalez, Victoria
Chhabra, Neeraj
Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title_full Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title_fullStr Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title_full_unstemmed Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title_short Student Doctor Network: Fake News or Facts for Emergency Medicine Applicants?
title_sort student doctor network: fake news or facts for emergency medicine applicants?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060870
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53581
work_keys_str_mv AT schnarrseanb studentdoctornetworkfakenewsorfactsforemergencymedicineapplicants
AT gonzalezvictoria studentdoctornetworkfakenewsorfactsforemergencymedicineapplicants
AT chhabraneeraj studentdoctornetworkfakenewsorfactsforemergencymedicineapplicants