Cargando…

Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory

We propose an adaptation of Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory, neo-ecological theory. As bioecological theory was developed in the 20(th) century, it requires significant modifications to reflect some of the most ubiquitous contexts in which adolescents learn, play, and grow—the technologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarro, Jessica L., Tudge, Jonathan R. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
_version_ 1784638266249576448
author Navarro, Jessica L.
Tudge, Jonathan R. H.
author_facet Navarro, Jessica L.
Tudge, Jonathan R. H.
author_sort Navarro, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description We propose an adaptation of Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory, neo-ecological theory. As bioecological theory was developed in the 20(th) century, it requires significant modifications to reflect some of the most ubiquitous contexts in which adolescents learn, play, and grow—the technological and virtual ones. Although several scholars have developed laudable theories related to youth development in virtual contexts, the field lacks an overarching theory to address the intersection of development and technology. In developing neo-ecological theory, we hold true to the tenets of bioecological theory, but suggest key modifications to reflect our technologized world. We delineate a key alteration to the microsystem, namely the existence of two types of microsystems—physical and virtual. In addition, we emphasize the importance of macrosystemic influences (i.e., the influences of culture and within-society subcultural variation) in understanding development in the digital age. The implications of these modifications cascade across the Process-Person-Context-Time (PPCT) model; proximal processes, person characteristics, context, and time are all reexamined. In the digital age, virtual microsystems are central contexts in which youth engage in proximal processes. As such, we believe that all scholars of development, regardless of their specific research interests, should consider the ways digital contexts influence their outcomes of interest. Without it, practitioners, policy makers, parents, and technologists will be in the dark about how best to support adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8782219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87822192022-01-24 Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory Navarro, Jessica L. Tudge, Jonathan R. H. Curr Psychol Article We propose an adaptation of Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory, neo-ecological theory. As bioecological theory was developed in the 20(th) century, it requires significant modifications to reflect some of the most ubiquitous contexts in which adolescents learn, play, and grow—the technological and virtual ones. Although several scholars have developed laudable theories related to youth development in virtual contexts, the field lacks an overarching theory to address the intersection of development and technology. In developing neo-ecological theory, we hold true to the tenets of bioecological theory, but suggest key modifications to reflect our technologized world. We delineate a key alteration to the microsystem, namely the existence of two types of microsystems—physical and virtual. In addition, we emphasize the importance of macrosystemic influences (i.e., the influences of culture and within-society subcultural variation) in understanding development in the digital age. The implications of these modifications cascade across the Process-Person-Context-Time (PPCT) model; proximal processes, person characteristics, context, and time are all reexamined. In the digital age, virtual microsystems are central contexts in which youth engage in proximal processes. As such, we believe that all scholars of development, regardless of their specific research interests, should consider the ways digital contexts influence their outcomes of interest. Without it, practitioners, policy makers, parents, and technologists will be in the dark about how best to support adolescents. Springer US 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8782219/ /pubmed/35095241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Navarro, Jessica L.
Tudge, Jonathan R. H.
Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title_full Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title_fullStr Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title_full_unstemmed Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title_short Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory
title_sort technologizing bronfenbrenner: neo-ecological theory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
work_keys_str_mv AT navarrojessical technologizingbronfenbrennerneoecologicaltheory
AT tudgejonathanrh technologizingbronfenbrennerneoecologicaltheory