Cargando…
Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study
INTRODUCTION: The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses. METHODS: RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0 |
_version_ | 1784638347921063936 |
---|---|
author | Costa Clemens, Sue Ann Weckx, Lily Clemens, Ralf Almeida Mendes, Ana Verena Ramos Souza, Alessandra Silveira, Mariana B V da Guarda, Suzete Nascimento Farias de Nobrega, Maristela Miyamoto de Moraes Pinto, Maria Isabel Gonzalez, Isabela G S Salvador, Natalia Franco, Marilia Miranda de Avila Mendonça, Renata Navis Queiroz Oliveira, Isabelle Silva de Freitas Souza, Bruno Solano Fraga, Mayara Aley, Parvinder Bibi, Sagida Cantrell, Liberty Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa Liu, Xinxue Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip Supasa, Piyada Screaton, Gavin R Lambe, Teresa Voysey, Merryn Pollard, Andrew J |
author_facet | Costa Clemens, Sue Ann Weckx, Lily Clemens, Ralf Almeida Mendes, Ana Verena Ramos Souza, Alessandra Silveira, Mariana B V da Guarda, Suzete Nascimento Farias de Nobrega, Maristela Miyamoto de Moraes Pinto, Maria Isabel Gonzalez, Isabela G S Salvador, Natalia Franco, Marilia Miranda de Avila Mendonça, Renata Navis Queiroz Oliveira, Isabelle Silva de Freitas Souza, Bruno Solano Fraga, Mayara Aley, Parvinder Bibi, Sagida Cantrell, Liberty Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa Liu, Xinxue Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip Supasa, Piyada Screaton, Gavin R Lambe, Teresa Voysey, Merryn Pollard, Andrew J |
author_sort | Costa Clemens, Sue Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses. METHODS: RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safety and immunogenicity study of Brazilian adults (18 years and older) in São Paulo or Salvador who had received two doses of CoronaVac 6 months previously. The third heterologous dose was of either a recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S, Janssen), an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech), or a recombinant adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), compared with a third homologous dose of CoronaVac. Participants were randomly assigned (5:6:5:5) by a RedCAP computer randomisation system stratified by site, age group (18–60 years or 61 years and over), and day of randomisation, with a block size of 42. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of anti-spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the booster dose in the heterologous boost groups compared with homologous regimen, using a non-inferiority margin for the geometric mean ratio (heterologous vs homologous) of 0·67. Secondary outcomes included neutralising antibody titres at day 28, local and systemic reactogenicity profiles, adverse events, and serious adverse events. This study was registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR–9nn3scw. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, and Sept 1, 2021, 1240 participants were randomly assigned to one of the four groups, of whom 1239 were vaccinated and 1205 were eligible for inclusion in the primary analysis. Antibody concentrations were low before administration of a booster dose with detectable neutralising antibodies of 20·4% (95% CI 12·8–30·1) in adults aged 18–60 years and 8·9% (4·2–16·2) in adults 61 years or older. From baseline to day 28 after the booster vaccine, all groups had a substantial rise in IgG antibody concentrations: the geometric fold-rise was 77 (95% CI 67–88) for Ad26.COV2-S, 152 (134–173) for BNT162b2, 90 (77–104) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and 12 (11–14) for CoronaVac. All heterologous regimens had anti-spike IgG responses at day 28 that were superior to homologous booster responses: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 6·7 (95% CI 5·8–7·7) for Ad26.COV2-S, 13·4 (11·6–15·3) for BNT162b2, and 7·0 (6·1–8·1) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. All heterologous boost regimens induced high concentrations of pseudovirus neutralising antibodies. At day 28, all groups except for the homologous boost in the older adults reached 100% seropositivity: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 8·7 (95% CI 5·9–12·9) for Ad26.COV2-S vaccine, 21·5 (14·5–31·9) for BNT162b2, and 10·6 (7·2–15·6) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Live virus neutralising antibodies were also boosted against delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron variants (B.1.1.529). There were five serious adverse events. Three of which were considered possibly related to the vaccine received: one in the BNT162b2 group and two in the Ad26.COV2-S group. All participants recovered and were discharged home. INTERPRETATION: Antibody concentrations were low at 6 months after previous immunisation with two doses of CoronaVac. However, all four vaccines administered as a third dose induced a significant increase in binding and neutralising antibodies, which could improve protection against infection. Heterologous boosting resulted in more robust immune responses than homologous boosting and might enhance protection. FUNDING: Ministry of Health, Brazil. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8782575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87825752022-01-24 Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study Costa Clemens, Sue Ann Weckx, Lily Clemens, Ralf Almeida Mendes, Ana Verena Ramos Souza, Alessandra Silveira, Mariana B V da Guarda, Suzete Nascimento Farias de Nobrega, Maristela Miyamoto de Moraes Pinto, Maria Isabel Gonzalez, Isabela G S Salvador, Natalia Franco, Marilia Miranda de Avila Mendonça, Renata Navis Queiroz Oliveira, Isabelle Silva de Freitas Souza, Bruno Solano Fraga, Mayara Aley, Parvinder Bibi, Sagida Cantrell, Liberty Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa Liu, Xinxue Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip Supasa, Piyada Screaton, Gavin R Lambe, Teresa Voysey, Merryn Pollard, Andrew J Lancet Articles INTRODUCTION: The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses. METHODS: RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safety and immunogenicity study of Brazilian adults (18 years and older) in São Paulo or Salvador who had received two doses of CoronaVac 6 months previously. The third heterologous dose was of either a recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S, Janssen), an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech), or a recombinant adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), compared with a third homologous dose of CoronaVac. Participants were randomly assigned (5:6:5:5) by a RedCAP computer randomisation system stratified by site, age group (18–60 years or 61 years and over), and day of randomisation, with a block size of 42. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of anti-spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the booster dose in the heterologous boost groups compared with homologous regimen, using a non-inferiority margin for the geometric mean ratio (heterologous vs homologous) of 0·67. Secondary outcomes included neutralising antibody titres at day 28, local and systemic reactogenicity profiles, adverse events, and serious adverse events. This study was registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR–9nn3scw. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, and Sept 1, 2021, 1240 participants were randomly assigned to one of the four groups, of whom 1239 were vaccinated and 1205 were eligible for inclusion in the primary analysis. Antibody concentrations were low before administration of a booster dose with detectable neutralising antibodies of 20·4% (95% CI 12·8–30·1) in adults aged 18–60 years and 8·9% (4·2–16·2) in adults 61 years or older. From baseline to day 28 after the booster vaccine, all groups had a substantial rise in IgG antibody concentrations: the geometric fold-rise was 77 (95% CI 67–88) for Ad26.COV2-S, 152 (134–173) for BNT162b2, 90 (77–104) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and 12 (11–14) for CoronaVac. All heterologous regimens had anti-spike IgG responses at day 28 that were superior to homologous booster responses: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 6·7 (95% CI 5·8–7·7) for Ad26.COV2-S, 13·4 (11·6–15·3) for BNT162b2, and 7·0 (6·1–8·1) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. All heterologous boost regimens induced high concentrations of pseudovirus neutralising antibodies. At day 28, all groups except for the homologous boost in the older adults reached 100% seropositivity: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 8·7 (95% CI 5·9–12·9) for Ad26.COV2-S vaccine, 21·5 (14·5–31·9) for BNT162b2, and 10·6 (7·2–15·6) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Live virus neutralising antibodies were also boosted against delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron variants (B.1.1.529). There were five serious adverse events. Three of which were considered possibly related to the vaccine received: one in the BNT162b2 group and two in the Ad26.COV2-S group. All participants recovered and were discharged home. INTERPRETATION: Antibody concentrations were low at 6 months after previous immunisation with two doses of CoronaVac. However, all four vaccines administered as a third dose induced a significant increase in binding and neutralising antibodies, which could improve protection against infection. Heterologous boosting resulted in more robust immune responses than homologous boosting and might enhance protection. FUNDING: Ministry of Health, Brazil. Elsevier 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8782575/ /pubmed/35074136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Costa Clemens, Sue Ann Weckx, Lily Clemens, Ralf Almeida Mendes, Ana Verena Ramos Souza, Alessandra Silveira, Mariana B V da Guarda, Suzete Nascimento Farias de Nobrega, Maristela Miyamoto de Moraes Pinto, Maria Isabel Gonzalez, Isabela G S Salvador, Natalia Franco, Marilia Miranda de Avila Mendonça, Renata Navis Queiroz Oliveira, Isabelle Silva de Freitas Souza, Bruno Solano Fraga, Mayara Aley, Parvinder Bibi, Sagida Cantrell, Liberty Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa Liu, Xinxue Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip Supasa, Piyada Screaton, Gavin R Lambe, Teresa Voysey, Merryn Pollard, Andrew J Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title | Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title_full | Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title_fullStr | Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title_short | Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
title_sort | heterologous versus homologous covid-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of coronavac covid-19 vaccine in brazil (rhh-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costaclemenssueann heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT weckxlily heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT clemensralf heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT almeidamendesanaverena heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT ramossouzaalessandra heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT silveiramarianabv heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT daguardasuzetenascimentofarias heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT denobregamaristelamiyamoto heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT demoraespintomariaisabel heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT gonzalezisabelags heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT salvadornatalia heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT francomariliamiranda heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT deavilamendoncarenatanavis heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT queirozoliveiraisabellesilva heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT defreitassouzabrunosolano heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT fragamayara heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT aleyparvinder heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT bibisagida heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT cantrellliberty heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT dejnirattisaiwanwisa heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT liuxinxue heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT mongkolsapayajuthathip heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT supasapiyada heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT screatongavinr heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT lambeteresa heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT voyseymerryn heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT pollardandrewj heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy AT heterologousversushomologouscovid19boostervaccinationinpreviousrecipientsoftwodosesofcoronavaccovid19vaccineinbrazilrhh001aphase4noninferioritysingleblindrandomisedstudy |