Cargando…

Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density

BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malter, Wolfram, Bachmann, Bo Jan, Krug, Barbara, Hellmich, Martin, Zinser, Max, Mallmann, Peter, Eichler, Christian, Puppe, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1
_version_ 1784638384773267456
author Malter, Wolfram
Bachmann, Bo Jan
Krug, Barbara
Hellmich, Martin
Zinser, Max
Mallmann, Peter
Eichler, Christian
Puppe, Julian
author_facet Malter, Wolfram
Bachmann, Bo Jan
Krug, Barbara
Hellmich, Martin
Zinser, Max
Mallmann, Peter
Eichler, Christian
Puppe, Julian
author_sort Malter, Wolfram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective parameters that can help to improve the optimal implant selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 198 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy. Breast densities (ACR) measured in mammography and MRI were compared with the removed breast tissue weight and volume of the implants used. In addition, the resected weight was compared directly with the implant volume to calculate a mathematical function. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the ACR values and the resected weights [correlation coefficient: mammography:− 0.117 (p = 0.176), MRI − 0.033 (p = 0.756)]. A negative correlation between the implant volumes and both imaging methods could be demonstrated [correlation coefficient: mammography − 0.268; p = 0.002; MRI was − 0.200 (p = 0.055)]. A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed. This correlation corresponds to a power function (y = 34.71 x(0.39)), in which any resected weight can be used for the variable x to calculate the implant volume. CONCLUSION: We were able to show that there is a significant correlation between the resected breast tissue and the implant volume. With our novel potency function, the appropriate implant volume can be calculated for any resected weight making it easier for the surgeon to choose a fitting implant in a simple and more objective manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8782773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87827732022-02-02 Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density Malter, Wolfram Bachmann, Bo Jan Krug, Barbara Hellmich, Martin Zinser, Max Mallmann, Peter Eichler, Christian Puppe, Julian Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective parameters that can help to improve the optimal implant selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 198 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy. Breast densities (ACR) measured in mammography and MRI were compared with the removed breast tissue weight and volume of the implants used. In addition, the resected weight was compared directly with the implant volume to calculate a mathematical function. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the ACR values and the resected weights [correlation coefficient: mammography:− 0.117 (p = 0.176), MRI − 0.033 (p = 0.756)]. A negative correlation between the implant volumes and both imaging methods could be demonstrated [correlation coefficient: mammography − 0.268; p = 0.002; MRI was − 0.200 (p = 0.055)]. A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed. This correlation corresponds to a power function (y = 34.71 x(0.39)), in which any resected weight can be used for the variable x to calculate the implant volume. CONCLUSION: We were able to show that there is a significant correlation between the resected breast tissue and the implant volume. With our novel potency function, the appropriate implant volume can be calculated for any resected weight making it easier for the surgeon to choose a fitting implant in a simple and more objective manner. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8782773/ /pubmed/34189629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Gynecologic Oncology
Malter, Wolfram
Bachmann, Bo Jan
Krug, Barbara
Hellmich, Martin
Zinser, Max
Mallmann, Peter
Eichler, Christian
Puppe, Julian
Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title_full Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title_fullStr Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title_full_unstemmed Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title_short Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
title_sort correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
topic Gynecologic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1
work_keys_str_mv AT malterwolfram correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT bachmannbojan correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT krugbarbara correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT hellmichmartin correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT zinsermax correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT mallmannpeter correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT eichlerchristian correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity
AT puppejulian correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity