Cargando…
Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density
BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1 |
_version_ | 1784638384773267456 |
---|---|
author | Malter, Wolfram Bachmann, Bo Jan Krug, Barbara Hellmich, Martin Zinser, Max Mallmann, Peter Eichler, Christian Puppe, Julian |
author_facet | Malter, Wolfram Bachmann, Bo Jan Krug, Barbara Hellmich, Martin Zinser, Max Mallmann, Peter Eichler, Christian Puppe, Julian |
author_sort | Malter, Wolfram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective parameters that can help to improve the optimal implant selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 198 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy. Breast densities (ACR) measured in mammography and MRI were compared with the removed breast tissue weight and volume of the implants used. In addition, the resected weight was compared directly with the implant volume to calculate a mathematical function. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the ACR values and the resected weights [correlation coefficient: mammography:− 0.117 (p = 0.176), MRI − 0.033 (p = 0.756)]. A negative correlation between the implant volumes and both imaging methods could be demonstrated [correlation coefficient: mammography − 0.268; p = 0.002; MRI was − 0.200 (p = 0.055)]. A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed. This correlation corresponds to a power function (y = 34.71 x(0.39)), in which any resected weight can be used for the variable x to calculate the implant volume. CONCLUSION: We were able to show that there is a significant correlation between the resected breast tissue and the implant volume. With our novel potency function, the appropriate implant volume can be calculated for any resected weight making it easier for the surgeon to choose a fitting implant in a simple and more objective manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8782773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87827732022-02-02 Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density Malter, Wolfram Bachmann, Bo Jan Krug, Barbara Hellmich, Martin Zinser, Max Mallmann, Peter Eichler, Christian Puppe, Julian Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology BACKGROUND: The current methods for calculating the ideal implant volume for breast reconstruction are based on pre- or intraoperative volume measurements of the existing breast volume and do not take into account the individual breast density of the woman. This study aims is to identify objective parameters that can help to improve the optimal implant selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 198 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy. Breast densities (ACR) measured in mammography and MRI were compared with the removed breast tissue weight and volume of the implants used. In addition, the resected weight was compared directly with the implant volume to calculate a mathematical function. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the ACR values and the resected weights [correlation coefficient: mammography:− 0.117 (p = 0.176), MRI − 0.033 (p = 0.756)]. A negative correlation between the implant volumes and both imaging methods could be demonstrated [correlation coefficient: mammography − 0.268; p = 0.002; MRI was − 0.200 (p = 0.055)]. A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed. This correlation corresponds to a power function (y = 34.71 x(0.39)), in which any resected weight can be used for the variable x to calculate the implant volume. CONCLUSION: We were able to show that there is a significant correlation between the resected breast tissue and the implant volume. With our novel potency function, the appropriate implant volume can be calculated for any resected weight making it easier for the surgeon to choose a fitting implant in a simple and more objective manner. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8782773/ /pubmed/34189629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Oncology Malter, Wolfram Bachmann, Bo Jan Krug, Barbara Hellmich, Martin Zinser, Max Mallmann, Peter Eichler, Christian Puppe, Julian Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title | Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title_full | Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title_fullStr | Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title_short | Correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
title_sort | correlation analysis of resected breast tissue and implant volume after mastectomy and its association with breast density |
topic | Gynecologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06128-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malterwolfram correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT bachmannbojan correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT krugbarbara correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT hellmichmartin correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT zinsermax correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT mallmannpeter correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT eichlerchristian correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity AT puppejulian correlationanalysisofresectedbreasttissueandimplantvolumeaftermastectomyanditsassociationwithbreastdensity |