Cargando…
Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete?
OBJECTIVE: Cold and warm water ear irrigation, also known as bithermal caloric testing, has been considered for over 100 years the ‘Gold Standard’ for the detection of peripheral vestibular hypofunction. Its discovery was awarded a Nobel Prize. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Calo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10667-7 |
_version_ | 1784638385750540288 |
---|---|
author | Morrison, Miranda Korda, Athanasia Zamaro, Ewa Wagner, Franca Caversaccio, Marco D. Sauter, Thomas C. Kalla, Roger Mantokoudis, Georgios |
author_facet | Morrison, Miranda Korda, Athanasia Zamaro, Ewa Wagner, Franca Caversaccio, Marco D. Sauter, Thomas C. Kalla, Roger Mantokoudis, Georgios |
author_sort | Morrison, Miranda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cold and warm water ear irrigation, also known as bithermal caloric testing, has been considered for over 100 years the ‘Gold Standard’ for the detection of peripheral vestibular hypofunction. Its discovery was awarded a Nobel Prize. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Caloric Testing when compared to the video head impulse test (vHIT) in differentiating between vestibular neuritis and vestibular strokes in acute dizziness. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study (convenience sample). SETTING: All patients presenting with signs of an acute vestibular syndrome at the emergency department of a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand, six hundred seventy-seven patients were screened between February 2015 and May 2020 for Acute Vestibular Syndrome (AVS), of which 152 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of a state of continuous dizziness, associated with nausea or vomiting, head-motion intolerance, new gait or balance disturbance and nystagmus. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, if symptoms lasted < 24 h or if the index ED visit was > 72 h after symptom onset. Of the 152 included patients 85 completed testing. We assessed 58 vestibular neuritis and 27 stroke patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients underwent calorics and vHIT followed by a delayed MRI which served as a gold standard for vestibular stroke confirmation. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting stroke with a caloric asymmetry cut-off of 30.9% was 75% and 86.8%, respectively [negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.29] compared to 91.7% and 88.7% for vHIT (NLR 0.094). Best VOR gain cut-off was 0.685. Twenty-five percent of vestibular strokes were misclassified by calorics, 8% by vHIT. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric testing proved to be less accurate than vHIT in discriminating stroke from vestibular neuritis in acute dizziness. Contrary to classic teaching, asymmetric caloric responses can also occur with vestibular strokes and might put the patient at risk for misdiagnosis. We, therefore, recommend to abandon caloric testing in current practice and to replace it with vHIT in the acute setting. Caloric testing has still its place as a diagnostic tool in an outpatient setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10667-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8782777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87827772022-02-02 Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? Morrison, Miranda Korda, Athanasia Zamaro, Ewa Wagner, Franca Caversaccio, Marco D. Sauter, Thomas C. Kalla, Roger Mantokoudis, Georgios J Neurol Original Communication OBJECTIVE: Cold and warm water ear irrigation, also known as bithermal caloric testing, has been considered for over 100 years the ‘Gold Standard’ for the detection of peripheral vestibular hypofunction. Its discovery was awarded a Nobel Prize. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Caloric Testing when compared to the video head impulse test (vHIT) in differentiating between vestibular neuritis and vestibular strokes in acute dizziness. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study (convenience sample). SETTING: All patients presenting with signs of an acute vestibular syndrome at the emergency department of a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand, six hundred seventy-seven patients were screened between February 2015 and May 2020 for Acute Vestibular Syndrome (AVS), of which 152 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of a state of continuous dizziness, associated with nausea or vomiting, head-motion intolerance, new gait or balance disturbance and nystagmus. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, if symptoms lasted < 24 h or if the index ED visit was > 72 h after symptom onset. Of the 152 included patients 85 completed testing. We assessed 58 vestibular neuritis and 27 stroke patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients underwent calorics and vHIT followed by a delayed MRI which served as a gold standard for vestibular stroke confirmation. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting stroke with a caloric asymmetry cut-off of 30.9% was 75% and 86.8%, respectively [negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.29] compared to 91.7% and 88.7% for vHIT (NLR 0.094). Best VOR gain cut-off was 0.685. Twenty-five percent of vestibular strokes were misclassified by calorics, 8% by vHIT. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric testing proved to be less accurate than vHIT in discriminating stroke from vestibular neuritis in acute dizziness. Contrary to classic teaching, asymmetric caloric responses can also occur with vestibular strokes and might put the patient at risk for misdiagnosis. We, therefore, recommend to abandon caloric testing in current practice and to replace it with vHIT in the acute setting. Caloric testing has still its place as a diagnostic tool in an outpatient setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10667-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8782777/ /pubmed/34191079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10667-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Morrison, Miranda Korda, Athanasia Zamaro, Ewa Wagner, Franca Caversaccio, Marco D. Sauter, Thomas C. Kalla, Roger Mantokoudis, Georgios Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title | Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title_full | Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title_fullStr | Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title_full_unstemmed | Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title_short | Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
title_sort | paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete? |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10667-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisonmiranda paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT kordaathanasia paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT zamaroewa paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT wagnerfranca paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT caversacciomarcod paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT sauterthomasc paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT kallaroger paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete AT mantokoudisgeorgios paradigmshiftinacutedizzinessiscalorictestingobsolete |