Cargando…

The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliometric analysis is a statistical method that attempts to assess articles by their citations, analyzing their frequency and citation pattern, which subsequently gleans direction and guidance for future research. Over the past few years, articles focused on intrauterine adhesions have been publi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Pan, Li, Waixing, Zhao, Xingping, Xu, Dabao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00794-x
_version_ 1784638386054627328
author Gu, Pan
Li, Waixing
Zhao, Xingping
Xu, Dabao
author_facet Gu, Pan
Li, Waixing
Zhao, Xingping
Xu, Dabao
author_sort Gu, Pan
collection PubMed
description Bibliometric analysis is a statistical method that attempts to assess articles by their citations, analyzing their frequency and citation pattern, which subsequently gleans direction and guidance for future research. Over the past few years, articles focused on intrauterine adhesions have been published with increasing frequency. Nevertheless, little is known about the properties and qualities of this research, and no current analysis exists that has examined the progress in intrauterine adhesion research. Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Citation Index, and MEDLINE database were searched to identify articles on intrauterine adhesion published from 1950 to October 2020. The 100 most cited articles were chosen to analyze citation count, citation density, authorship, theme, geographic distribution, time-related flux, level of evidence, and network analysis. An overwhelming majority of these 100 articles were published in the 2010s (35%). Citations per article ranged from 30 to 253. Chinese authors published the most papers in the top 100, followed by the USA, France, Israel, and Italy. The most salient study themes included operative hysteroscopy and adjunctive treatments for improving reproductive outcomes. The most common level of evidence was level II, and there was no statistical difference in the number of citations between the levels. The network analysis indicated that hysteroscopy, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, infertility, and the reproductive outcome had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s and 2010s. In comparison, placental implantation had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s, and stem cell and fibrosis had a great degree of centrality in the 2010s. The value of IUA investigation has been gradually appreciated recently. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was continuously explored to achieve better reproductive outcome. Over time, the main focus of research has gradually shifted from complications to postoperative adjuvant treatment. Moreover, breakthrough progress is needed in underlying mechanism and early prevention of IUA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8782778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87827782022-02-02 The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis Gu, Pan Li, Waixing Zhao, Xingping Xu, Dabao Reprod Sci General Gynecology: Original Article Bibliometric analysis is a statistical method that attempts to assess articles by their citations, analyzing their frequency and citation pattern, which subsequently gleans direction and guidance for future research. Over the past few years, articles focused on intrauterine adhesions have been published with increasing frequency. Nevertheless, little is known about the properties and qualities of this research, and no current analysis exists that has examined the progress in intrauterine adhesion research. Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Citation Index, and MEDLINE database were searched to identify articles on intrauterine adhesion published from 1950 to October 2020. The 100 most cited articles were chosen to analyze citation count, citation density, authorship, theme, geographic distribution, time-related flux, level of evidence, and network analysis. An overwhelming majority of these 100 articles were published in the 2010s (35%). Citations per article ranged from 30 to 253. Chinese authors published the most papers in the top 100, followed by the USA, France, Israel, and Italy. The most salient study themes included operative hysteroscopy and adjunctive treatments for improving reproductive outcomes. The most common level of evidence was level II, and there was no statistical difference in the number of citations between the levels. The network analysis indicated that hysteroscopy, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, infertility, and the reproductive outcome had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s and 2010s. In comparison, placental implantation had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s, and stem cell and fibrosis had a great degree of centrality in the 2010s. The value of IUA investigation has been gradually appreciated recently. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was continuously explored to achieve better reproductive outcome. Over time, the main focus of research has gradually shifted from complications to postoperative adjuvant treatment. Moreover, breakthrough progress is needed in underlying mechanism and early prevention of IUA. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8782778/ /pubmed/34780024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00794-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Gynecology: Original Article
Gu, Pan
Li, Waixing
Zhao, Xingping
Xu, Dabao
The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title_full The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title_short The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort top 100 most cited articles on intrauterine adhesion: a bibliometric analysis
topic General Gynecology: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00794-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gupan thetop100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT liwaixing thetop100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT zhaoxingping thetop100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT xudabao thetop100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT gupan top100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT liwaixing top100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT zhaoxingping top100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis
AT xudabao top100mostcitedarticlesonintrauterineadhesionabibliometricanalysis