Cargando…

Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis

BACKGROUND: Cementless total knee arthroplasty is gaining interest as total knee arthroplasty patients become younger, more active, and interested in long-term biologic fixation. New porous coatings have altered mechanical properties to improve bone osseointegration, although limited data exist on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, Richard L., Baral, Elexis C., Slaven, Sean E., Wright, Timothy M., Westrich, Geoffrey H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.12.007
_version_ 1784638452221870080
author Purcell, Richard L.
Baral, Elexis C.
Slaven, Sean E.
Wright, Timothy M.
Westrich, Geoffrey H.
author_facet Purcell, Richard L.
Baral, Elexis C.
Slaven, Sean E.
Wright, Timothy M.
Westrich, Geoffrey H.
author_sort Purcell, Richard L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cementless total knee arthroplasty is gaining interest as total knee arthroplasty patients become younger, more active, and interested in long-term biologic fixation. New porous coatings have altered mechanical properties to improve bone osseointegration, although limited data exist on this topic. We measured the bone ongrowth on retrieved tibial trays to determine how demographic, radiographic, or implant design factors correlate with ongrowth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty retrieved trays were assessed from 3 designs: Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal (n = 9), Stryker Triathlon Tritanium (n = 6), and Biomet Vanguard Regenerex (n = 5). Exclusion criteria included revision for aseptic loosening or early postoperative infection. Ongrowth on the tibial components and on corresponding pegs (if accessible) was assessed. The amount of osseointegration was reported as the bone directly opposed to the surface divided by the available area for ongrowth. Radiographs were reviewed for alignment and regions of biologic fixation. RESULTS: Bone ongrowth covered 65% ± 19% of the tibial tray surface and did not differ among manufacturers (P = .27). Medial pegs had less ongrowth than lateral pegs (39% vs 64%, P = .02). Vanguard medial pegs had less ongrowth than NexGen medial pegs (15% vs 61%, P = .03). Length of implantation was different between the NexGen (55 months) and Triathlon (24 months, P < .05) design only. Patient and radiographic data demonstrated no correlation with ongrowth. CONCLUSION: An average 65% of the porous tibial tray surface had ongrowth at revision. These values are consistent with manufacturing claims for excellent bone ongrowth for newer porous coatings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87831052022-01-28 Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis Purcell, Richard L. Baral, Elexis C. Slaven, Sean E. Wright, Timothy M. Westrich, Geoffrey H. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Cementless total knee arthroplasty is gaining interest as total knee arthroplasty patients become younger, more active, and interested in long-term biologic fixation. New porous coatings have altered mechanical properties to improve bone osseointegration, although limited data exist on this topic. We measured the bone ongrowth on retrieved tibial trays to determine how demographic, radiographic, or implant design factors correlate with ongrowth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty retrieved trays were assessed from 3 designs: Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal (n = 9), Stryker Triathlon Tritanium (n = 6), and Biomet Vanguard Regenerex (n = 5). Exclusion criteria included revision for aseptic loosening or early postoperative infection. Ongrowth on the tibial components and on corresponding pegs (if accessible) was assessed. The amount of osseointegration was reported as the bone directly opposed to the surface divided by the available area for ongrowth. Radiographs were reviewed for alignment and regions of biologic fixation. RESULTS: Bone ongrowth covered 65% ± 19% of the tibial tray surface and did not differ among manufacturers (P = .27). Medial pegs had less ongrowth than lateral pegs (39% vs 64%, P = .02). Vanguard medial pegs had less ongrowth than NexGen medial pegs (15% vs 61%, P = .03). Length of implantation was different between the NexGen (55 months) and Triathlon (24 months, P < .05) design only. Patient and radiographic data demonstrated no correlation with ongrowth. CONCLUSION: An average 65% of the porous tibial tray surface had ongrowth at revision. These values are consistent with manufacturing claims for excellent bone ongrowth for newer porous coatings. Elsevier 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8783105/ /pubmed/35097169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.12.007 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Purcell, Richard L.
Baral, Elexis C.
Slaven, Sean E.
Wright, Timothy M.
Westrich, Geoffrey H.
Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title_full Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title_fullStr Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title_short Bone Ongrowth of Contemporary Cementless Tibial Components: A Retrieval Analysis
title_sort bone ongrowth of contemporary cementless tibial components: a retrieval analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.12.007
work_keys_str_mv AT purcellrichardl boneongrowthofcontemporarycementlesstibialcomponentsaretrievalanalysis
AT baralelexisc boneongrowthofcontemporarycementlesstibialcomponentsaretrievalanalysis
AT slavenseane boneongrowthofcontemporarycementlesstibialcomponentsaretrievalanalysis
AT wrighttimothym boneongrowthofcontemporarycementlesstibialcomponentsaretrievalanalysis
AT westrichgeoffreyh boneongrowthofcontemporarycementlesstibialcomponentsaretrievalanalysis