Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study

AIM: To compare two matrix systems (circumferential and sectional) based on clinical efficiency and patient acceptability for placement of visible light cure composite resin restorative material in a Class II cavity in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with bilateral Class II ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatia, Hind P, Sood, Shveta, Sharma, Naresh, Singh, Akshara, Rajagopal, Varshini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2060
_version_ 1784638482943049728
author Bhatia, Hind P
Sood, Shveta
Sharma, Naresh
Singh, Akshara
Rajagopal, Varshini
author_facet Bhatia, Hind P
Sood, Shveta
Sharma, Naresh
Singh, Akshara
Rajagopal, Varshini
author_sort Bhatia, Hind P
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare two matrix systems (circumferential and sectional) based on clinical efficiency and patient acceptability for placement of visible light cure composite resin restorative material in a Class II cavity in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with bilateral Class II cavities of age-group 5–9 years were selected. A split-mouth comparative experimental study was conducted at Manav Rachna Dental College, India. Cavities were restored using either circumferential or sectional matrix band system. The child upon completion of the treatment filled the subject preference questionnaire. Time assessment was done for matrix system placement. Contact points were evaluated using dental floss as open or closed. RESULTS: Time required to place sectional matrices was more (125.30 ± 29.40) than required for circumferential matrices (117.20 ± 38.94). The sectional matrices group has more ideal contacts (23) (76.7%) than the circumferential matrices group (16) (53.3%). About 70% of the children pointed discomfort toward the sectional matrices. Children in this study accepted circumferential matrices to be more comfortable than the sectional matrices group. CONCLUSION: The circumferential matrices group was more time efficient compared to the sectional matrices group. However, sectional matrices resulted in a greater number of restorations with ideal contacts. Based on the preference circumferential matrix band system has been found superior to sectional matrix band system. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study was conducted to find a better matrix system in case of pediatric patients. Circumferential matrices were found to be more superior with respect to preference and time efficiency and sectional matrices were preferred for ideal contacts. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Bhatia HP, Sood S, Sharma N, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(6):748–751.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87832122022-02-01 Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study Bhatia, Hind P Sood, Shveta Sharma, Naresh Singh, Akshara Rajagopal, Varshini Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article AIM: To compare two matrix systems (circumferential and sectional) based on clinical efficiency and patient acceptability for placement of visible light cure composite resin restorative material in a Class II cavity in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with bilateral Class II cavities of age-group 5–9 years were selected. A split-mouth comparative experimental study was conducted at Manav Rachna Dental College, India. Cavities were restored using either circumferential or sectional matrix band system. The child upon completion of the treatment filled the subject preference questionnaire. Time assessment was done for matrix system placement. Contact points were evaluated using dental floss as open or closed. RESULTS: Time required to place sectional matrices was more (125.30 ± 29.40) than required for circumferential matrices (117.20 ± 38.94). The sectional matrices group has more ideal contacts (23) (76.7%) than the circumferential matrices group (16) (53.3%). About 70% of the children pointed discomfort toward the sectional matrices. Children in this study accepted circumferential matrices to be more comfortable than the sectional matrices group. CONCLUSION: The circumferential matrices group was more time efficient compared to the sectional matrices group. However, sectional matrices resulted in a greater number of restorations with ideal contacts. Based on the preference circumferential matrix band system has been found superior to sectional matrix band system. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study was conducted to find a better matrix system in case of pediatric patients. Circumferential matrices were found to be more superior with respect to preference and time efficiency and sectional matrices were preferred for ideal contacts. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Bhatia HP, Sood S, Sharma N, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(6):748–751. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8783212/ /pubmed/35110865 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2060 Text en Copyright © 2021; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bhatia, Hind P
Sood, Shveta
Sharma, Naresh
Singh, Akshara
Rajagopal, Varshini
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency and patient acceptability toward the use of circumferential matrix and sectional matrix for restoration of class ii cavities in primary molars: an in vivo study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2060
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatiahindp comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficiencyandpatientacceptabilitytowardtheuseofcircumferentialmatrixandsectionalmatrixforrestorationofclassiicavitiesinprimarymolarsaninvivostudy
AT soodshveta comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficiencyandpatientacceptabilitytowardtheuseofcircumferentialmatrixandsectionalmatrixforrestorationofclassiicavitiesinprimarymolarsaninvivostudy
AT sharmanaresh comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficiencyandpatientacceptabilitytowardtheuseofcircumferentialmatrixandsectionalmatrixforrestorationofclassiicavitiesinprimarymolarsaninvivostudy
AT singhakshara comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficiencyandpatientacceptabilitytowardtheuseofcircumferentialmatrixandsectionalmatrixforrestorationofclassiicavitiesinprimarymolarsaninvivostudy
AT rajagopalvarshini comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficiencyandpatientacceptabilitytowardtheuseofcircumferentialmatrixandsectionalmatrixforrestorationofclassiicavitiesinprimarymolarsaninvivostudy