Cargando…

Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment

OBJECTIVES: To overcome the shortage of personal protective equipment and airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) in the COVID‐19 pandemic, a collaborative team of research engineers and clinical physicians worked to build a novel negative pressure environment in the hopes of improving healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Benjamin S., Moschella, Phillip, Mousavi, Ehsan S., LeMatty, Amanda S., Falconer, Robert J., Ashley, Noah D., Mohammadi Nafchi, Ali, Gaafary, Chris, DesJardins, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12656
_version_ 1784638526760943616
author Roth, Benjamin S.
Moschella, Phillip
Mousavi, Ehsan S.
LeMatty, Amanda S.
Falconer, Robert J.
Ashley, Noah D.
Mohammadi Nafchi, Ali
Gaafary, Chris
DesJardins, John D.
author_facet Roth, Benjamin S.
Moschella, Phillip
Mousavi, Ehsan S.
LeMatty, Amanda S.
Falconer, Robert J.
Ashley, Noah D.
Mohammadi Nafchi, Ali
Gaafary, Chris
DesJardins, John D.
author_sort Roth, Benjamin S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To overcome the shortage of personal protective equipment and airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) in the COVID‐19 pandemic, a collaborative team of research engineers and clinical physicians worked to build a novel negative pressure environment in the hopes of improving healthcare worker and patient safety. The team then sought to test the device's efficacy in generating and maintaining negative pressure. The goal proved prescient as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later recommended that all barrier devices use negative pressure. METHODS: Initially, engineers observed simulations of various aerosol‐ and droplet‐generating procedures using hospital beds and stretchers to determine the optimal working dimensions of the containment device. Several prototypes were made based on these dimensions which were combined with filters and various flow‐generating devices. Then, the airflow generated and the pressure differential within the device during simulated patient care were measured, specifically assessing its ability to create a negative pressure environment consistent with standards published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). RESULTS: The portable fans were unable to generate any airflow and were dropped from further testing. The vacuums tested were all able to generate a negative pressure environment with the magnitude of pressure differential increasing with the vacuum horsepower. Only the 3.5‐horsepower Shop‐Vac, however, generated a −3.0 pascal (Pa) pressure gradient, exceeding the CDC‐recommended minimum of −2.5 Pa for AIIRs. CONCLUSION: A collaborative team of physicians and engineers demonstrated the efficacy of a prototype portable negative pressure environment, surpassing the negative pressure differential recommended by the CDC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87833782022-02-01 Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment Roth, Benjamin S. Moschella, Phillip Mousavi, Ehsan S. LeMatty, Amanda S. Falconer, Robert J. Ashley, Noah D. Mohammadi Nafchi, Ali Gaafary, Chris DesJardins, John D. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Infectious Disease OBJECTIVES: To overcome the shortage of personal protective equipment and airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) in the COVID‐19 pandemic, a collaborative team of research engineers and clinical physicians worked to build a novel negative pressure environment in the hopes of improving healthcare worker and patient safety. The team then sought to test the device's efficacy in generating and maintaining negative pressure. The goal proved prescient as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later recommended that all barrier devices use negative pressure. METHODS: Initially, engineers observed simulations of various aerosol‐ and droplet‐generating procedures using hospital beds and stretchers to determine the optimal working dimensions of the containment device. Several prototypes were made based on these dimensions which were combined with filters and various flow‐generating devices. Then, the airflow generated and the pressure differential within the device during simulated patient care were measured, specifically assessing its ability to create a negative pressure environment consistent with standards published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). RESULTS: The portable fans were unable to generate any airflow and were dropped from further testing. The vacuums tested were all able to generate a negative pressure environment with the magnitude of pressure differential increasing with the vacuum horsepower. Only the 3.5‐horsepower Shop‐Vac, however, generated a −3.0 pascal (Pa) pressure gradient, exceeding the CDC‐recommended minimum of −2.5 Pa for AIIRs. CONCLUSION: A collaborative team of physicians and engineers demonstrated the efficacy of a prototype portable negative pressure environment, surpassing the negative pressure differential recommended by the CDC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8783378/ /pubmed/35112100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12656 Text en © 2022 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Roth, Benjamin S.
Moschella, Phillip
Mousavi, Ehsan S.
LeMatty, Amanda S.
Falconer, Robert J.
Ashley, Noah D.
Mohammadi Nafchi, Ali
Gaafary, Chris
DesJardins, John D.
Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title_full Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title_fullStr Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title_full_unstemmed Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title_short Development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
title_sort development and efficacy testing of a portable negative pressure enclosure for airborne infection containment
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12656
work_keys_str_mv AT rothbenjamins developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT moschellaphillip developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT mousaviehsans developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT lemattyamandas developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT falconerrobertj developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT ashleynoahd developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT mohammadinafchiali developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT gaafarychris developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment
AT desjardinsjohnd developmentandefficacytestingofaportablenegativepressureenclosureforairborneinfectioncontainment