Cargando…

Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), which measures the ability of cerebral blood vessels to dilate or constrict in response to vasoactive stimuli such as CO2 inhalation, is an important index of the brain’s vascular health. Quantification of CVR using BOLD MRI with hypercapnia challenge has shown grea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Peiying, Jiang, Dengrong, Albert, Marilyn, Bauer, Christopher E., Caprihan, Arvind, Gold, Brian T., Greenberg, Steven M., Helmer, Karl G., Jann, Kay, Jicha, Gregory, Rodriguez, Pavel, Satizabal, Claudia L., Seshadri, Sudha, Singh, Herpreet, Thompson, Jeffrey F., Wang, Danny J.J., Lu, Hanzhang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34826595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118754
_version_ 1784638528236290048
author Liu, Peiying
Jiang, Dengrong
Albert, Marilyn
Bauer, Christopher E.
Caprihan, Arvind
Gold, Brian T.
Greenberg, Steven M.
Helmer, Karl G.
Jann, Kay
Jicha, Gregory
Rodriguez, Pavel
Satizabal, Claudia L.
Seshadri, Sudha
Singh, Herpreet
Thompson, Jeffrey F.
Wang, Danny J.J.
Lu, Hanzhang
author_facet Liu, Peiying
Jiang, Dengrong
Albert, Marilyn
Bauer, Christopher E.
Caprihan, Arvind
Gold, Brian T.
Greenberg, Steven M.
Helmer, Karl G.
Jann, Kay
Jicha, Gregory
Rodriguez, Pavel
Satizabal, Claudia L.
Seshadri, Sudha
Singh, Herpreet
Thompson, Jeffrey F.
Wang, Danny J.J.
Lu, Hanzhang
author_sort Liu, Peiying
collection PubMed
description Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), which measures the ability of cerebral blood vessels to dilate or constrict in response to vasoactive stimuli such as CO2 inhalation, is an important index of the brain’s vascular health. Quantification of CVR using BOLD MRI with hypercapnia challenge has shown great promises in research and clinical studies. However, in order for it to be used as a potential imaging biomarker in large-scale and multi-site studies, the reliability of CO2-CVR quantification across different MRI acquisition platforms and researchers/raters must be examined. The goal of this report from the MarkVCID small vessel disease biomarkers consortium is to evaluate the reliability of CO2-CVR quantification in three studies. First, the inter-rater reliability of CO2-CVR data processing was evaluated by having raters from 5 MarkVCID sites process the same 30 CVR datasets using a cloud-based CVR data processing pipeline. Second, the inter-scanner reproducibility of CO2-CVR quantification was assessed in 10 young subjects across two scanners of different vendors. Third, test-retest repeatability was evaluated in 20 elderly subjects from 4 sites with a scan interval of less than 2 weeks. In all studies, the CO2 CVR measurements were performed using the fixed inspiration method, where the subjects wore a nose clip and a mouthpiece and breathed room air and 5% CO2 air contained in a Douglas bag alternatively through their mouth. The results showed that the inter-rater CoV of CVR processing was 0.08 ± 0.08% for whole-brain CVR values and ranged from 0.16% to 0.88% in major brain regions, with ICC of absolute agreement above 0.9959 for all brain regions. Inter-scanner CoV was found to be 6.90 ± 5.08% for whole-brain CVR values, and ranged from 4.69% to 12.71% in major brain regions, which are comparable to intra-session CoVs obtained from the same scanners on the same day. ICC of consistency between the two scanners was 0.8498 for whole-brain CVR and ranged from 0.8052 to 0.9185 across major brain regions. In the test-retest evaluation, test-retest CoV across different days was found to be 18.29 ± 17.12% for whole-brain CVR values, and ranged from 16.58% to 19.52% in major brain regions, with ICC of absolute agreement ranged from 0.6480 to 0.7785. These results demonstrated good inter-rater, inter-scanner, and test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers, and suggested that CO2-CVR has suitable instrumental properties for use as an imaging biomarker of cerebrovascular function in multi-site and longitudinal observational studies and clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87833932022-01-22 Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge Liu, Peiying Jiang, Dengrong Albert, Marilyn Bauer, Christopher E. Caprihan, Arvind Gold, Brian T. Greenberg, Steven M. Helmer, Karl G. Jann, Kay Jicha, Gregory Rodriguez, Pavel Satizabal, Claudia L. Seshadri, Sudha Singh, Herpreet Thompson, Jeffrey F. Wang, Danny J.J. Lu, Hanzhang Neuroimage Article Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), which measures the ability of cerebral blood vessels to dilate or constrict in response to vasoactive stimuli such as CO2 inhalation, is an important index of the brain’s vascular health. Quantification of CVR using BOLD MRI with hypercapnia challenge has shown great promises in research and clinical studies. However, in order for it to be used as a potential imaging biomarker in large-scale and multi-site studies, the reliability of CO2-CVR quantification across different MRI acquisition platforms and researchers/raters must be examined. The goal of this report from the MarkVCID small vessel disease biomarkers consortium is to evaluate the reliability of CO2-CVR quantification in three studies. First, the inter-rater reliability of CO2-CVR data processing was evaluated by having raters from 5 MarkVCID sites process the same 30 CVR datasets using a cloud-based CVR data processing pipeline. Second, the inter-scanner reproducibility of CO2-CVR quantification was assessed in 10 young subjects across two scanners of different vendors. Third, test-retest repeatability was evaluated in 20 elderly subjects from 4 sites with a scan interval of less than 2 weeks. In all studies, the CO2 CVR measurements were performed using the fixed inspiration method, where the subjects wore a nose clip and a mouthpiece and breathed room air and 5% CO2 air contained in a Douglas bag alternatively through their mouth. The results showed that the inter-rater CoV of CVR processing was 0.08 ± 0.08% for whole-brain CVR values and ranged from 0.16% to 0.88% in major brain regions, with ICC of absolute agreement above 0.9959 for all brain regions. Inter-scanner CoV was found to be 6.90 ± 5.08% for whole-brain CVR values, and ranged from 4.69% to 12.71% in major brain regions, which are comparable to intra-session CoVs obtained from the same scanners on the same day. ICC of consistency between the two scanners was 0.8498 for whole-brain CVR and ranged from 0.8052 to 0.9185 across major brain regions. In the test-retest evaluation, test-retest CoV across different days was found to be 18.29 ± 17.12% for whole-brain CVR values, and ranged from 16.58% to 19.52% in major brain regions, with ICC of absolute agreement ranged from 0.6480 to 0.7785. These results demonstrated good inter-rater, inter-scanner, and test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers, and suggested that CO2-CVR has suitable instrumental properties for use as an imaging biomarker of cerebrovascular function in multi-site and longitudinal observational studies and clinical trials. 2021-12-15 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8783393/ /pubmed/34826595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118754 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Peiying
Jiang, Dengrong
Albert, Marilyn
Bauer, Christopher E.
Caprihan, Arvind
Gold, Brian T.
Greenberg, Steven M.
Helmer, Karl G.
Jann, Kay
Jicha, Gregory
Rodriguez, Pavel
Satizabal, Claudia L.
Seshadri, Sudha
Singh, Herpreet
Thompson, Jeffrey F.
Wang, Danny J.J.
Lu, Hanzhang
Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title_full Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title_fullStr Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title_full_unstemmed Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title_short Multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
title_sort multi-vendor and multisite evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using hypercapnia challenge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34826595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118754
work_keys_str_mv AT liupeiying multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT jiangdengrong multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT albertmarilyn multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT bauerchristophere multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT caprihanarvind multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT goldbriant multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT greenbergstevenm multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT helmerkarlg multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT jannkay multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT jichagregory multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT rodriguezpavel multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT satizabalclaudial multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT seshadrisudha multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT singhherpreet multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT thompsonjeffreyf multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT wangdannyjj multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge
AT luhanzhang multivendorandmultisiteevaluationofcerebrovascularreactivitymappingusinghypercapniachallenge